TanLim Partnership

TanLim Partnership is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2025. The firm has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 2 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in family law. Their track record shows a 17.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 31.8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

TanLim Partnership has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	5 cases	9.6% of total caseload	Experienced67.50% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9.6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5.8% of total caseload	Experienced70.56% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	5.8% of total caseload	General Practice35.00% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice47.50% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice45.00% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced56.67% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice12.00% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice23.33% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	TanLim Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

TanLim Partnership has 2 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 21 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lim Chee San	21 cases	95.5% of firm's cases	2025 sghc 14(Jan 2025) 2023 sghc 67(Mar 2023) 2021 sgca 76(Aug 2021)
Tan Tee Giam	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 1(Jan 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of TanLim Partnership's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 7 (31.8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	173.8 parties avg	3.8	73.9%
Won	43.3 parties avg	3.3	17.4%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	8.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2021	64.3 parties avg	4.3
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of TanLim Partnership's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	17(73.9%)	73.9%
Won	4(17.4%)	17.4%
Partial	2(8.7%)	8.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2407326.01	114634.5713 cases	13
USD	2699793.3	2699793.301 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)
2014	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)
2021	06 6	Lost: 6 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by TanLim Partnership in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
D&N Trading & Consultancy LimitedAppellant, Defendant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Dinh Thi Hoang UyenAppellant, Defendant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Energy & Commodity Pte LtdAppellant, Defendant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim	2 cases	Lost (2)
Vu Xuan ThuAppellant, Defendant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Italmatic Tyre & Retreading Equipment (Asia) Pte LtdAppellant, Defendant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Sun Electric Power Pte LtdPlaintiff, Defendant Lost (2)	Plaintiff, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Ng Kek WeeAppellant, Defendant Won (1)Lost (1)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Won (1)Lost (1)
Tong Chi HoDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kwek Hong LimPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Sun Electric Power Pte LimitedAppellant, Defendant Lost (1)	Appellant, Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Sun Electric Pte LtdPlaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	1 case	Lost (1)
Matthew PelosoRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Tian Kong Buddhist TempleAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
UEQAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
GPE Pte LtdPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Tan Thiam SoonDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
The Management Corporation Strata Title No 562Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Diora-Ace LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
I.Contemporary Living Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Chan Mun KongDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Ng Hock HuatDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Dauphin Shipyard Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Poh SengRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Hong Investment Pte LtdPetitioner Won (1)	Petitioner	1 case	Won (1)