Aaron Wham

Aaron Wham is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and clean hands doctrine. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aaron Wham has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misrepresentation and injunctions.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misrepresentation	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Clean Hands Doctrine	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aaron Wham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aaron Wham has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	100% of cases	PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd: Application to Appeal Mareva Injunction Decision(May 2014) PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction for Lack of Clean Hands(Mar 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aaron Wham's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aaron Wham's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd: Application to Appeal Mareva Injunction Decision 05 May 2014 UPF Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	05 May 2014	UPF Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Mareva injunction set asideThe defendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was allowed.
2	PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction for Lack of Clean Hands 30 Mar 2014 Third defendant (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2014	Third defendant (Defendant): Application AllowedThe defendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.