PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction for Lack of Clean Hands

In PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard an application by UPF Holding Pte Ltd, and its directors to set aside a Mareva injunction. The injunction was initially granted to PSONS Ltd, a Hong Kong company, to prevent the defendants from disposing of assets up to US$900,000. The claim was for breach of contract and tort of deceit related to a failed mining license procurement in Laos. Choo Han Teck J allowed the application, finding that PSONS Ltd did not come to the court with clean hands due to their involvement and knowledge of illicit activities. The court set aside the Mareva injunction.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Defendants’ application to set aside the injunction allowed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court set aside a Mareva injunction against UPF Holding and its directors due to PSONS Ltd's involvement in illicit activities related to obtaining a mining license.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Second defendantDefendantIndividualApplication AllowedWon
Third defendantDefendantIndividualApplication AllowedWon
PSONS LtdPlaintiffCorporationInjunction Set AsideLost
UPF Holding Pte LtdDefendantCorporationApplication AllowedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff paid the first defendant US$841,350 to procure a mining license in Laos.
  2. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) outlined payment stages linked to obtaining the license.
  3. No mining license was obtained despite the payments.
  4. Parties entered into the Bangkok Agreement to resolve the dispute, but the license was still not obtained.
  5. Plaintiff commenced Suit No 750 of 2013 pleading breach of contract and tort of deceit.
  6. Plaintiff allegedly discovered forgery of a letter from a Deputy Minister in Laos by the defendants.
  7. Plaintiff continued to deal with the defendants even after discovering the alleged forgery.

5. Formal Citations

  1. PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd and others, Suit No 750 of 2013 (Summons No 5068 of 2013), [2014] SGHC 55

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff and first defendant signed a Memorandum of Understanding
Parties arrived at the Bangkok Agreement
Plaintiff commenced Suit No 750 of 2013 in the High Court
Court granted ex parte injunction order
Proceedings against the first defendant were stayed in favour of arbitration
Plaintiff commenced arbitration against the first defendant and filed the notice of arbitration
Counsel appeared before the court
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Setting Aside a Mareva Injunction
    • Outcome: The court allowed the application to set aside the Mareva injunction.
    • Category: Procedural
  2. Clean Hands Doctrine
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff did not come to the court with clean hands, thus equitable relief was denied.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Injunction

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Tort of Deceit

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Mining
  • Trading

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Solvadis Commodity Chemicals GmbH v Affert Resources Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2014] 1 SLR 174SingaporeCited for the proposition that evidence of a defendant's lack of probity can constitute evidence of a risk of dissipation of assets.
Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG and anotherHigh CourtYes[2011] 1 SLR 524SingaporeCited for its description of the 'clean hands' doctrine.
Guan Chong Cocoa Manufacturer Sdn Bhd v Pratiwi Shipping SAunknownYes[2003] 1 SLR(R) 157SingaporeCited with approval for the proposition that evidence of a defendant's lack of probity can constitute evidence of a risk of dissipation of assets.
Ninemia Maritime Corporation v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH (The Niedersachsen)unknownYes[1983] 1 WLR 1412England and WalesCited with approval for the proposition that evidence of a defendant's lack of probity can constitute evidence of a risk of dissipation of assets.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Mareva Injunction
  • Clean Hands Doctrine
  • Mining License
  • Memorandum of Understanding
  • Facilitation Fees
  • Illicit Activities

15.2 Keywords

  • Mareva Injunction
  • Clean Hands
  • Mining License
  • Breach of Contract
  • Singapore High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Injunctions
  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Equity