Abraham Vergis

Abraham Vergis is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 31 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 23% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Abraham Vergis has demonstrated expertise across 137 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 17 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Companies	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abnormality of Mind	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Complicity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Casino Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reliance Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rehabilitation of Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of fidelity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Inference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administration of Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Consent Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consignment Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor-client relationship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Actual Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Video Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tort	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share of Profit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Delay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Management Deadlock	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraining Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Digital Penetration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Abraham Vergis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Abraham Vergis has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Providence Law Asia LLC	16 cases	52% of cases	Maag v Modi: Defamation & Malicious Falsehood Claims, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Amendment of Pleadings(Dec 2024) DKT v DKU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Nov 2024) VEW v VEV: Anti-Suit Injunction & Restraint of Foreign Proceedings in Divorce(Apr 2022)
Drew & Napier LLC	10 cases	32% of cases	Law Society v K Jayakumar Naidu: Solicitor's Duty of Care & Loyalty(Oct 2012) Law Society v Ng Bock Hoh Dixon: Disciplinary Action for False Bill & Integrity Breach(Nov 2011) Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler Service: Enforcement of Consent Order for Share Transfer(Mar 2010)
Drew & Napier	3 cases	10% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society: Professional Conduct, Overcharging & Legal Profession Act(Nov 2006) Anthony Wee v Law Society: Application of Legal Profession Act on Solicitor Misconduct Allegations(Nov 2006) CEF v Goh: Breach of Warranty, Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Seng Hup Shares Acquisition(Nov 2001)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	Moganaruban v PP: Criminal Conspiracy, Defrauding Court & Insurance Companies(Aug 2005)
Providence Law	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Ariffan bin Mohd Hassan: Rape, Outraging Modesty, Adverse Inference(Apr 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Abraham Vergis's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 7 (23%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	134.8 parties avg	4.8	42%
Partial	74.0 parties avg	4.0	23%
Won	122.7 parties avg	2.7	39%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	35.2 parties avg	5.2
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Abraham Vergis's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(41%)	41%
Partial	7(22%)	22%
Won	12(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	94,232.59	7,248.6613 cases	13
USD	9,799,221.94	9,799,221.941 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 31 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Maag v Modi: Defamation & Malicious Falsehood Claims, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Amendment of Pleadings 04 Dec 2024 Lalit Kumar Modi (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	04 Dec 2024	Lalit Kumar Modi (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with some amendments to the statement of claim permitted and others disallowed.
2	DKT v DKU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 25 Nov 2024 DKU (Respondent)Won	25 Nov 2024	DKU (Respondent): Costs awarded to DKUCosts of SGD 55,000 awarded to DKU on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	VEW v VEV: Anti-Suit Injunction & Restraint of Foreign Proceedings in Divorce 13 Apr 2022 VEV (Respondent)Lost	13 Apr 2022	VEV (Respondent): Anti-Suit Injunction Set AsideAnti-suit injunction set aside. Costs of CA 52 and OS 14 awarded to the appellant. Costs of SUM 80 also awarded to the appellant. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	United Securities Sdn Bhd v United Overseas Bank: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of Foreign Proceedings 09 Aug 2021 United Securities Sdn Bhd (in receivership and liquidation) (Appellant)Lost	09 Aug 2021	United Securities Sdn Bhd (in receivership and liquidation) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no stay of Singapore proceedings granted.
5	The Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 23 Jun 2020 Cheng Yi Han (Zhong Yihan) (Defendant)Lost	23 Jun 2020	Cheng Yi Han (Zhong Yihan) (Defendant): Worldwide Mareva injunction granted against assetsWorldwide Mareva injunction granted against the Defendants’ assets up to the value of US$9,799,221.94 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD).
6	Goh Guan Sin v Yeo Tseng Tsai: Medical Negligence, Post-Surgery Care, Brain Tumour, Persistent Vegetative State 26 Nov 2019 Goh Guan Sin (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Nov 2019	Goh Guan Sin (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for medical negligence was dismissed.
7	Griffin Real Estate v. ERC Unicampus: Account of Profits for Big Hotel Sale 23 Oct 2019 Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	23 Oct 2019	Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartThe court allowed the appeal in part by modifying the formula for computing the net profit. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
8	Bachmeer Capital v Ong Chih Ching: Video Link Evidence in International Commercial Dispute 12 Feb 2018 DMITRIY SHPORT (Defendant)Partial	12 Feb 2018	DMITRIY SHPORT (Defendant): Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.
9	Macquarie Bank v. Graceland Industry: Amendment of Pleadings in Commodity Swap Dispute 23 Jan 2018 STEPHEN BECHER WOLFE (Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	23 Jan 2018	STEPHEN BECHER WOLFE (Defendant in Counterclaim): Costs awardedCosts of the application and costs in relation to consequential amendments to the pleadings were ordered to be paid by Graceland to Mr. Wolfe. Costs for the first hearing were fixed at $1,500, including disbursements. Additional costs for the second and third hearings were fixed at $1,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Ariffan bin Mohd Hassan: Rape, Outraging Modesty, Adverse Inference 11 Apr 2017 Mohd Ariffan bin Mohd Hassan (Accused)Won	11 Apr 2017	Mohd Ariffan bin Mohd Hassan (Accused): AcquittedThe accused was acquitted on all five charges.
11	Guay Seng Tiong Nickson v Public Prosecutor: Negligence, Causation, and Sentencing in Fatal Traffic Accident 12 May 2016 Nickson Guay Seng Tiong (Appellant)Lost	12 May 2016	Nickson Guay Seng Tiong (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against the sentence of four weeks' imprisonment and a five-year disqualification order was dismissed.
12	Public Prosecutor v Rosdi Bin Joenet: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 12 Apr 2016 Rosdi Bin Joenet (Defendant)Lost	12 Apr 2016	Rosdi Bin Joenet (Defendant): ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to 9 years' imprisonment, backdated to the date of remand.
13	Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World: False Imprisonment, Assault & Battery in Casino 03 Nov 2015 Goel Adesh Kumar (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Nov 2015	Goel Adesh Kumar (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiff in partJudgment for the plaintiff in part. The Casino is liable for $36,732.59, that being 80% of the total damages that I have awarded (ie, $45,915.74). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Re Michael Fordham QC: Ad Hoc Admission & Judicial Review of Law Society Decision 04 Nov 2014 Michael Fordham QC (Applicant)Lost	04 Nov 2014	Michael Fordham QC (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission was dismissed.
15	Motorola v Uzan: Revocation of Powers of Attorney & Receivership Order 28 Oct 2014 Haj Capital Pte Limited (Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2014	Haj Capital Pte Limited (Defendant): Order granted to revoke powers of attorneyOrder granted to revoke powers of attorney with effect from the date of the Receivership Order.
16	YTL Construction v Balanced Engineering: SOP Act Adjudication Determination Dispute 14 Jul 2014 YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Jul 2014	YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiff's application to set aside the adjudication determination was allowed.
17	PP v Adnan bin Kadir: Importation of Controlled Drugs & Purpose of Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jun 2013 Adnan bin Kadir (Respondent)Lost	27 Jun 2013	Adnan bin Kadir (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal set aside the High Court's orders, dismissed the Respondent's appeal against his sentence, given that his sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment and 5 strokes of the cane is the mandatory minimum sentence for his offence of importing a Class A drug.
18	Law Society v K Jayakumar Naidu: Solicitor's Duty of Care & Loyalty 02 Oct 2012 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	02 Oct 2012	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application grantedThe Law Society's application for disciplinary action against the respondent was granted, resulting in his suspension. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Law Society v Ng Bock Hoh Dixon: Disciplinary Action for False Bill & Integrity Breach 08 Nov 2011 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	08 Nov 2011	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Order for Respondent to be struck off the roll grantedThe Law Society's application was successful, and the Respondent was ordered to be struck off the roll. No order as to costs was made.
20	Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler Service: Enforcement of Consent Order for Share Transfer 02 Mar 2010 Second, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth defendant (Defendant, Applicant)Won	02 Mar 2010	Second, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth defendant (Defendant, Applicant): Application allowedApplication to enforce consent order allowed.
21	Chow Kwok Chuen v Chow Kwok Chi: Winding Up of Family Companies on Just and Equitable Grounds 12 Aug 2008 Chow Kwok Chi (Respondent)Won	12 Aug 2008	Chow Kwok Chi (Respondent): Winding-up Order AffirmedThe court affirmed the winding-up order of the Companies (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Chow Kwok Ching v Chow Kwok Chi: Oppression, Family Business, and Companies Act 25 Jun 2008 Chow Kwok Chi (Defendant)Partial	25 Jun 2008	Chow Kwok Chi (Defendant): Partial LossThe plaintiff was entitled to recover 65% of his costs from the first and second defendants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Chan Kum Hong Randy v Public Prosecutor: Mitigating Effect of Delay in Criminal Prosecution 03 Feb 2008 Chan Kum Hong Randy (Appellant)Won	03 Feb 2008	Chan Kum Hong Randy (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; sentences reduced to two days' imprisonment.
24	Lee Tung Co: Winding Up Application by Non-Minority Shareholder on Just and Equitable Grounds 21 Nov 2007 Chow Kwok Chi (Plaintiff)Won	21 Nov 2007	Chow Kwok Chi (Plaintiff): Application grantedThe court ordered Lee Tung Company (Private) Limited to be wound up.
25	Soh Beng Tee v Fairmount: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 08 May 2007 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	08 May 2007	Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs awarded to Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd both here and below.
26	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society: Professional Conduct, Overcharging & Legal Profession Act 26 Nov 2006 Law Society of Singapore (Defendant)Partial	26 Nov 2006	Law Society of Singapore (Defendant): Determination Partially AffirmedThe court affirmed the Law Society's determination in relation to the complaints relating to breach of rr 35(c) and (e) and the fixed deposit issue but was ordered to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a disciplinary committee in relation to the complaint concerning the issue of the invoice for $612,300.
27	Anthony Wee v Law Society: Application of Legal Profession Act on Solicitor Misconduct Allegations 26 Nov 2006 The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2006	The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Determination of Council AffirmedCourt affirmed the determination of the Council in relation to both complaints. Mr. Wee shall pay the Law Society’s costs in connection with this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Fairmount Development v. Soh Beng Tee: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice 16 Oct 2006 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	16 Oct 2006	Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent): Award set asideAward set aside due to breach of natural justice. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	Meyer Erwin v Lerner Brian: Security for Costs in Consignment Agreement Dispute 14 Sep 2006 Meyer Erwin (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	14 Sep 2006	Meyer Erwin (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedMeyer's appeal against providing additional security for costs was allowed.
30	Moganaruban v PP: Criminal Conspiracy, Defrauding Court & Insurance Companies 15 Aug 2005 Moganaruban s/o Subramaniam (Appellant)Lost	15 Aug 2005	Moganaruban s/o Subramaniam (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed. Sentences enhanced.Appeal against conviction dismissed. Sentences enhanced. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	CEF v Goh: Breach of Warranty, Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Seng Hup Shares Acquisition 18 Nov 2001 Goh Chin Soon (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	18 Nov 2001	Goh Chin Soon (Defendant, Appellant): Claims DismissedClaims against Sng Chee Hua dismissed with costs.