Adrian Ee

Adrian Ee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in partnership law and trademarks. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Ee has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Renovation Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Destruction of Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Ee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Ee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	3 cases	100% of cases	Chua Tian Chu v Chin Bay Ching: Specific Performance & Liquidated Damages in Property Sale(May 2011) Tang Da-Yan v Bar None (S) Pte Ltd: Negligence Claim for Tile Installation(Mar 2011) Ng Chu Chong v Ng Swee Choon: Trademark Infringement Dispute After Partnership Dissolution(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Ee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.1
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	23.7 parties avg	3.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Ee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	820,000.00	820,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chua Tian Chu v Chin Bay Ching: Specific Performance & Liquidated Damages in Property Sale 19 May 2011 Cheang Poh Ling Pauline (Plaintiff)Partial	19 May 2011	Cheang Poh Ling Pauline (Plaintiff): Specific performance ordered, claim for rectification costs allowed, claim for liquidated damages dismissed in partSpecific performance of the agreement was ordered. The claim for rectification costs was allowed in the agreed sum of $410,000. The claim for liquidated damages was dismissed in part, except for the sum of $141,922.19 already deducted. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tang Da-Yan v Bar None (S) Pte Ltd: Negligence Claim for Tile Installation 02 Mar 2011 Refine Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party)Dismissed	02 Mar 2011	Refine Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party): Application dismissedThe third party's application to strike out the defendant's claim was dismissed.
3	Ng Chu Chong v Ng Swee Choon: Trademark Infringement Dispute After Partnership Dissolution 27 Feb 2002 Chian Lian Fong (Defendant)Lost	27 Feb 2002	Chian Lian Fong (Defendant): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.