Adrian Tan Gim Hai

Adrian Tan Gim Hai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and passing off. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated expertise across 51 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Groundless threats of infringement proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
LPA Revocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obligation of confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Goods Sold and Delivered	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Franchise Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Powers of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deputyship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan Gim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Tan Gim Hai has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	6 cases	43% of cases	WLR v WLT: Deputyship & LPA Revocation under Mental Capacity Act(May 2023) Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Governance(Dec 2022) Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Passing Off(Oct 2020)
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	36% of cases	AOS v Estate of AOT: Inheritance Act Claim by Widow After Divorce Proceedings Aborted(May 2012) Dovechem Holdings v Ng Joo Soon: Director Removal & Company Record Inspection(Jul 2011) Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler: Enforcing Consent Order for Share Purchase(Sep 2010)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	3 cases	21% of cases	Wee Shuo Woon v HT S.R.L.: Legal Professional Privilege & Confidentiality after Data Breach(Mar 2017) Singsung Pte Ltd v LG 26 Electronics: Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats(May 2016) Lim Li Meng Dominic v Ching Pui Sim Sally: Collective Sale, Good Faith, Land Titles (Strata) Act(Oct 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Tan Gim Hai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.9
Complex Cases: 8 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	7%
Lost	611.9 parties avg	11.9	43%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	7%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	14%
Won	44.2 parties avg	4.2	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	214.2 parties avg	14.2
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Tan Gim Hai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(7%)	7%
Lost	6(43%)	43%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	2(14%)	14%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,652,012.47	739,112.509 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WLR v WLT: Deputyship & LPA Revocation under Mental Capacity Act 10 May 2023 WLT (Defendant, Plaintiff, Appellant)Dismissed	10 May 2023	WLT (Defendant, Plaintiff, Appellant): Application dismissedApplication to appoint Mr Lau Chin Huat as deputy dismissed.
2	Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Governance 01 Dec 2022 Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	01 Dec 2022	Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $80,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Passing Off 18 Oct 2020 Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	18 Oct 2020	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd to pay costs of SGD 57,000 to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, Passing Off 04 Nov 2019 Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	04 Nov 2019	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim allowed in partClaim for breach of clause 12 of the Employment Agreement in respect of Timothy allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assume the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD for Singapore).
5	Kok Yin Chong v Lim Hun Joo: Collective Sale Dispute over Goodluck Garden 29 Apr 2019 Kok Yin Chong (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2019	Kok Yin Chong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellants to pay their own costs for the proceedings in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Low Kwang Tong v Karen Teo Mei Ling: Strata Titles, Collective Sales Dispute 28 Nov 2018 Low Kwang Tong (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2018	Low Kwang Tong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellant is ordered to pay the respondents costs of $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Wee Shuo Woon v HT S.R.L.: Legal Professional Privilege & Confidentiality after Data Breach 29 Mar 2017 HT SRL (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	29 Mar 2017	HT SRL (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Wee to pay HT costs of $28,000 (inclusive of reasonable disbursements) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Singsung Pte Ltd v LG 26 Electronics: Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats 22 May 2016 Singsung Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	22 May 2016	Singsung Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; injunction granted; damages to be assessed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Lim Li Meng Dominic v Ching Pui Sim Sally: Collective Sale, Good Faith, Land Titles (Strata) Act 01 Oct 2015 LIM LI MENG DOMINIC (Appellant)Won	01 Oct 2015	LIM LI MENG DOMINIC (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs.
10	AOS v Estate of AOT: Inheritance Act Claim by Widow After Divorce Proceedings Aborted 24 May 2012 AOS (Appellant)Lost	24 May 2012	AOS (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no financial provision awarded beyond existing accommodation arrangements.
11	Dovechem Holdings v Ng Joo Soon: Director Removal & Company Record Inspection 18 Jul 2011 NG JOO SOON alias NGA JU SOON (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	18 Jul 2011	NG JOO SOON alias NGA JU SOON (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler: Enforcing Consent Order for Share Purchase 23 Sep 2010 Others (Respondent)Neutral	23 Sep 2010	Others (Respondent): Order of Court to standThe rest of the Order of Court was to stand.
13	Hawley & Hazel v Szu Ming: Summary Judgment for Goods Sold, Parallel Imports & Distributorship Termination 27 Jan 2008 Hawley & Hazel Chemical Co (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	27 Jan 2008	Hawley & Hazel Chemical Co (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and final judgment awarded to the plaintiff in the sum of $6,452,012.47 with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ (9 March 2007) to the date of judgment (21 September 2007). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Go Go Delicacy v Carona Holdings: Default Judgment & Arbitration Stay Application 25 Jun 2007 Carona Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Jun 2007	Carona Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment in default of defenceJudgment in default of defence entered against the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.