Adrian Wee

Adrian Wee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and civil practice. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Wee has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Club Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attempt to commit culpable homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatric opinion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Wee has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Characterist LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	Seah Lei Sie Linda v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Voluntarily Causing Hurt, and Causation in Criminal Law(Mar 2020) Neville v Andrla: Summary Judgment & Moneylender Act Dispute(Nov 2017) Lawrence Khong v Singapore Polo Club: Apparent Bias in Disciplinary Proceedings(Apr 2014)
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	33% of cases	Law Society v Nor'ain Abu Bakar: Lawyers' Misconduct in Deceiving Court over Release of Funds(Oct 2008) Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok Hing: Attempted Culpable Homicide & Sentencing Considerations(Mar 2008)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Ngee Ann Kongsi v Teochew Poit Ip Huay Kuan: Conversion of Originating Summons & Property Dispute(Oct 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Wee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Wee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
GBP	409,414.00	409,414.001 cases	1
SGD	19,800.00	4,950.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seah Lei Sie Linda v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Voluntarily Causing Hurt, and Causation in Criminal Law 29 Mar 2020 Seah Lei Sie Linda (Applicant)Lost	29 Mar 2020	Seah Lei Sie Linda (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to refer questions of law was dismissed. The applicant shall pay $11,800 to the Victim (in default six weeks’ imprisonment). The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ngee Ann Kongsi v Teochew Poit Ip Huay Kuan: Conversion of Originating Summons & Property Dispute 29 Oct 2019 The Ngee Ann Kongsi (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Oct 2019	The Ngee Ann Kongsi (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe application to resist the conversion of the originating summons into a writ action was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Neville v Andrla: Summary Judgment & Moneylender Act Dispute 13 Nov 2017 DOMINIC ANDRLA (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	13 Nov 2017	DOMINIC ANDRLA (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; defendant liable to repay GBP 409,414 plus contractual interest from 31 January 2017 until the date of final payment.
4	Lawrence Khong v Singapore Polo Club: Apparent Bias in Disciplinary Proceedings 20 Apr 2014 Lawrence Khong Kin Hoong (Plaintiff)Won	20 Apr 2014	Lawrence Khong Kin Hoong (Plaintiff): Application AllowedApplication to set aside the decision to suspend the Plaintiff’s membership was allowed. Damages to be assessed. Costs of $8,000 inclusive of disbursements awarded to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Law Society v Nor'ain Abu Bakar: Lawyers' Misconduct in Deceiving Court over Release of Funds 07 Oct 2008 Ruby Tan Kim Suan (Respondent)Partial	07 Oct 2008	Ruby Tan Kim Suan (Respondent): Suspended from practice for three yearsRuby Tan Kim Suan was suspended from practice for three years.
6	Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok Hing: Attempted Culpable Homicide & Sentencing Considerations 09 Mar 2008 Kwong Kok Hing (Respondent)Lost	09 Mar 2008	Kwong Kok Hing (Respondent): Sentence IncreasedThe respondent's sentence was increased from one year to three years imprisonment.