Ajinderpal Singh

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 24 judgments

Ajinderpal Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in guarantee and recourse against award. Their track record shows a 46.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated expertise across 79 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	19 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	12 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Standard form contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leave to Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Existence of arbitration agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of Goods by Air and Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tapping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Call and Put Option Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ajinderpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ajinderpal Singh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	8 cases	33% of cases	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Construction Dispute - EOT, CC, Defect Rectification(Oct 2022) CJA v CIZ: Recourse Against Arbitral Award & Setting Aside - Singapore Arbitration Law(May 2022) CIZ v CJA: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Exceeding Jurisdiction on Consultancy Agreement Dispute(Jul 2021)
Rodyk & Davidson	6 cases	25% of cases	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Application Under Companies Act(Jun 2007) Abdul Salam Asanaru Pillai v Nomanbhoy: Summary Judgment, Equitable Set-Off & Cashew Nut Contracts Dispute(Mar 2007) Sun Technosystems v Federal Express: Bailment, Carrier Duties & Hijacking(Nov 2006)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	17% of cases	AKM v AKN: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Jurisdictional Excess(Jul 2014) Metalform Asia v Ser Kim Koi: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Warranties(Aug 2008) Lai Shit Har v Lau Yu Man: Winding-Up Application as Abuse of Process(Jul 2008)
Rodyk and Davidson	4 cases	17% of cases	SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract & Interpretation of Exclusion Clause in Network Lease Agreement(Feb 2006) SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract for Unauthorized Use of Leased Fibre Optic Network(Apr 2005) Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals(Sep 2004)
Rajah & Tann	2 cases	8% of cases	Publicis Group v Chong Hon Kuan: Enforcing Call and Put Option Agreement(Feb 2003) Ong Khim Heng Daniel v Leonie Court: En-Bloc Sale, Strata Titles Board Approval & Contractual Obligations(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ajinderpal Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 12 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.8 parties avg	3.8	25%
Neutral	22.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Partial	55.3 parties avg	5.3	21%
Won	114.7 parties avg	4.7	46%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	29.5 parties avg	9.5
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	55.7 parties avg	5.7
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	35.2 parties avg	5.2
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ajinderpal Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(25%)	25%
Neutral	2(8%)	8%
Partial	5(21%)	21%
Won	11(46%)	46%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	61,000.00	6,100.0010 cases	10
USD	62,664,343.82	31,332,171.912 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	5 23	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2007	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Construction Dispute - EOT, CC, Defect Rectification 02 Oct 2022 Ser Kim Koi (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	02 Oct 2022	Ser Kim Koi (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding the determination of delay length, certification process, and liquidated damages.
2	CJA v CIZ: Recourse Against Arbitral Award & Setting Aside - Singapore Arbitration Law 16 May 2022 CIZ (Respondent)Lost	16 May 2022	CIZ (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to refund the amount (if paid) to the appellant and to pay the appellant as legal costs the total sum of $60,000.00 in respect of the appeal and the hearing before the Judge, together with reasonable disbursements as agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	CIZ v CJA: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Exceeding Jurisdiction on Consultancy Agreement Dispute 14 Jul 2021 CIZ (Plaintiff)Won	14 Jul 2021	CIZ (Plaintiff): Award relating to the X Opportunity set asideThe court set aside the arbitration award relating to the X Opportunity.
4	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Appeal Leave for Costs Order in Construction Dispute 25 Mar 2021 Ser Kim Koi (Applicant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	25 Mar 2021	Ser Kim Koi (Applicant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Leave to appeal grantedLeave to appeal against the costs order granted; appeal on costs to be heard together with the substantive appeal. Ser Kim Koi was ordered to pay GTMS $1,000 forthwith, inclusive of disbursements, as costs for the leave application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment & Striking Out in Guarantee Claim 28 Apr 2019 Guo BingQiang (Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	28 Apr 2019	Guo BingQiang (Defendant in Counterclaim): Counterclaim Struck OutCounterclaim against Guo BingQiang was struck out.
6	CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment on Guarantee & Striking Out Counterclaim 28 Apr 2019 CRRC (Hong Kong) Co Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	28 Apr 2019	CRRC (Hong Kong) Co Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$31,173,698.53. Counterclaim against the Plaintiff struck out.
7	BNX v BOE: Admission of Further Evidence on Appeal and Implied Undertaking 25 Jun 2018 BOE (Respondent, Defendant)Won	25 Jun 2018	BOE (Respondent, Defendant): Application GrantedBOE successfully opposed BNX's applications in SUM 132 and SUM 133 to adduce further evidence on appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	BNX v BOE: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract 20 Nov 2017 BOE (Defendant, Respondent)Won	20 Nov 2017	BOE (Defendant, Respondent): Setting aside application dismissed; Striking out application allowedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's action was allowed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	AKM v AKN: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Jurisdictional Excess 30 Jul 2014 Funds (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2014	Funds (Plaintiff): Applications AllowedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was allowed.
10	Metalform Asia v Ser Kim Koi: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Warranties 12 Aug 2008 Ser Kim Koi (Defendant)Won	12 Aug 2008	Ser Kim Koi (Defendant): Successful in striking out portions of the claimSuccessfully applied to strike out portions of the plaintiff's statement of claim.
11	Lai Shit Har v Lau Yu Man: Winding-Up Application as Abuse of Process 27 Jul 2008 Lau Yu Man (Respondent)Lost	27 Jul 2008	Lau Yu Man (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal allowed; no order as to costs here and below.
12	Ser Kim Koi v Fulton William Merrell: Discovery of Documents & Litigation Privilege 12 Feb 2008 Ser Kim Koi (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Feb 2008	Ser Kim Koi (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partThe plaintiffs' appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision was dismissed in part.
13	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Application Under Companies Act 19 Jun 2007 Lau Yu Man (Applicant)Neutral	19 Jun 2007	Lau Yu Man (Applicant): Application adjournedApplication for winding up adjourned with liberty to apply for a winding up order after 5 June 2007 if the Company fails to rectify the breaches or fails to comply with the Companies Act; costs of the winding up application reserved.
14	Abdul Salam Asanaru Pillai v Nomanbhoy: Summary Judgment, Equitable Set-Off & Cashew Nut Contracts Dispute 29 Mar 2007 Nomanbhoy & Sons Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	29 Mar 2007	Nomanbhoy & Sons Pte Ltd (Defendant): Conditional Leave to DefendConditional leave to defend the Abbas claim by requiring that security in the sum of US$316,946.76 be furnished.
15	Sun Technosystems v Federal Express: Bailment, Carrier Duties & Hijacking 07 Nov 2006 Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2006	Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Lim Swee Khiang v Borden Co: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Act Remedies 24 Sep 2006 Lim Swee Khiang (Appellant)Won	24 Sep 2006	Lim Swee Khiang (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The court found the respondents had acted in disregard of the appellants' interests as minority shareholders.
17	Sun Tech v FedEx: Hijacking & Bailee's Duty of Care in Air Carriage 19 Apr 2006 Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2006	Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd, dismissing the plaintiff's claim with costs.
18	Ng Huat Foundations v Samwoh Resources: Joint Venture Contract Dispute Over Post-Repudiation Profits 13 Mar 2006 Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	13 Mar 2006	Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
19	SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract & Interpretation of Exclusion Clause in Network Lease Agreement 05 Feb 2006 Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (Respondent)Lost	05 Feb 2006	Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs; judgment on liability entered against Starhub and for damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract for Unauthorized Use of Leased Fibre Optic Network 27 Apr 2005 Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Apr 2005	Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (Defendant): Breached AgreementBreached the agreement by tapping, but no damages awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals 02 Sep 2004 Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	02 Sep 2004	Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Application granted in partApplication to file a single case and a single core bundle for the appeals was granted. Application to adduce additional evidence was adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal.
22	Salim Anthony v Sumitomo: Assignment of Creditors' Rights & Guarantee Discharge 03 Jun 2004 Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 Jun 2004	Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders in favor of PlaintiffOrders in favor of Plaintiff; the court declared the assignment invalid and affirmed the plaintiff's discharge of obligations under the guarantee, entitling him to subrogation rights. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Publicis Group v Chong Hon Kuan: Enforcing Call and Put Option Agreement 27 Feb 2003 Chong Hon Kuan Ivan (Defendant)Neutral	27 Feb 2003	Chong Hon Kuan Ivan (Defendant): Proceedings to continue as if begun by writThe court ordered that the proceedings continue as if the cause or matter had been begun by writ.
24	Ong Khim Heng Daniel v Leonie Court: En-Bloc Sale, Strata Titles Board Approval & Contractual Obligations 16 Nov 2000 Ong Khim Heng Daniel (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	16 Nov 2000	Ong Khim Heng Daniel (Plaintiff, Defendant): Declaration that the agreement continues to be valid and binding until the Board has ruled on the second applicationThe court declared that the plaintiffs are entitled to assert that the agreement continues to be valid and binding until the Board has ruled on the second application to the Board.