Alessa

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 4 judgments

Alessa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and setting aside. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alessa has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in jurisdiction and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Jurisdiction	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Time Limit Extension	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside default judgment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alessa has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	CZT v CZU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract(Nov 2023) CZT v CZU: Production of Arbitral Tribunal Deliberation Records in Setting Aside Application(Jun 2023)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	BXS v BXT: Costs for Setting Aside Final Award in SICC Arbitration(Sep 2019) BXS v BXT: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Time Limit Extension & Arbitrator Composition(Jun 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alessa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alessa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	40,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CZT v CZU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract 26 Nov 2023 CZU (Defendant)Won	26 Nov 2023	CZU (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's application, effectively upholding the arbitral award in favor of the defendant.
2	CZT v CZU: Production of Arbitral Tribunal Deliberation Records in Setting Aside Application 27 Jun 2023 CZU (Defendant)Won	27 Jun 2023	CZU (Defendant): Successful DefenseDefendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's applications for production of the records of deliberations from the arbitral tribunal.
3	BXS v BXT: Costs for Setting Aside Final Award in SICC Arbitration 10 Sep 2019 BXT (Defendant)Won	10 Sep 2019	BXT (Defendant): Costs AwardedThe Defendant was awarded costs of S$40,000, with simple interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of this judgment until payment by the Plaintiff.
4	BXS v BXT: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Time Limit Extension & Arbitrator Composition 19 Jun 2019 BXT (Defendant)Won	19 Jun 2019	BXT (Defendant): Striking Out Application SucceedsThe Defendant’s striking out application succeeds.