Alvin Chang

Alvin Chang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and international commercial arbitration. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 5% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alvin Chang has demonstrated expertise across 66 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign arbitral award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Products Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alvin Chang has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M & A Law Corporation	8 cases	42% of cases	Lim Poh Yeoh v TS Ong Construction: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Payment of Costs and Judgment Debt(Jan 2017) Leong Eva v Loo Yek Hwee Robin: Partnership Dispute over Dong Ba LLP(Nov 2013) Ng Siam Khui v Ang Meng Lee: Bankruptcy Application Dispute Over Debt Payment(Apr 2010)
M&A Law Corporation	3 cases	16% of cases	Lim Poh Yeoh v TS Ong Construction: Setting Aside Statutory Demand Under SOPA for Building & Construction Law Dispute(Aug 2016) Pierre Gupson v Wong Kok Huay: Personal Injury Claim - Assessment of Damages(May 2014) Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act(May 2010)
Khattar Wong & Partners	3 cases	16% of cases	Digital Dispatch v Citycab: Arbitration Appeal on Contract Interpretation & Arbitrator's Jurisdiction(Jan 2003) Mitsui v PSA Corp & Keppel: Stay of Proceedings under International Arbitration Act(Aug 2002) Teo Hee Lai v Anwar Siraj: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability(Jul 2002)
M and A Law Corporation	2 cases	11% of cases	PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia v Dexia Bank: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Conflict(Oct 2005) XACCT Technologies Ltd v Orient Telecommunication Networks: Discovery of Internal Documents(Jun 2004)
Tay Lye & Ngaw Partnership	2 cases	11% of cases	Lim Choon Lai v Chew Kim Heng: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce(Jun 2001) KCC v Anti Corrosion: Defective Paint Claim & Damages Assessment(Jun 2001)
Toh Tan & Pnrs	1 cases	5% of cases	Sri Jaya v RHB Bank: Mortgagee's Duty, Negligence, Corporate Veil & Land Sale(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alvin Chang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.7 parties avg	2.7	42%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	16%
Won	82.5 parties avg	2.5	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2010	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alvin Chang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(42%)	42%
Partial	3(16%)	16%
Won	8(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,028,926.96	419,077.2512 cases	12
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Poh Yeoh v TS Ong Construction: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Payment of Costs and Judgment Debt 30 Jan 2017 TS Ong Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	30 Jan 2017	TS Ong Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Stay of proceedings grantedThe Defendant's application for a stay of Suit 92 pending the payment by the Plaintiff to the Defendant of all sums owed in respect of the orders of court made in OS 381 was granted. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lim Poh Yeoh v TS Ong Construction: Setting Aside Statutory Demand Under SOPA for Building & Construction Law Dispute 31 Aug 2016 TS Ong Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	31 Aug 2016	TS Ong Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and statutory demand set aside. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Pierre Gupson v Wong Kok Huay: Personal Injury Claim - Assessment of Damages 13 May 2014 Pierre Gupson (Plaintiff)Partial	13 May 2014	Pierre Gupson (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $61,138.83 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Leong Eva v Loo Yek Hwee Robin: Partnership Dispute over Dong Ba LLP 10 Nov 2013 Leong Eva (Plaintiff)Won	10 Nov 2013	Leong Eva (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the beneficial interest in the partnership business, namely Dong Ba LLP, had vested in the plaintiff absolutely as of 4 May 2012. The first and second defendants shall pay the plaintiff damages to be assessed and costs and disbursements of this suit to be taxed, unless agreed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act 20 May 2010 Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 May 2010	Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application against the first defendant was dismissed with costs.
6	Ng Siam Khui v Ang Meng Lee: Bankruptcy Application Dispute Over Debt Payment 04 Apr 2010 Ang Meng Lee (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	04 Apr 2010	Ang Meng Lee (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed against the defendant. The plaintiff sought bankruptcy against the defendant based on a debt of $1,740,755.87 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Helukabel Singapore v Ng Tuck Chuan: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Wrongful Dismissal 11 Dec 2008 Ng Tuck Chuan (Defendant)Partial	11 Dec 2008	Ng Tuck Chuan (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed in part for $5,032.26 with interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Striking Out Defence for Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders 02 Jun 2008 Pendleton Lane P (Defendant)Lost	02 Jun 2008	Pendleton Lane P (Defendant): Defence struck outThe defendant's defence was struck out.
9	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Discovery, Production of Documents & Inspection 21 Aug 2007 Pendleton Lane P (Defendant)Lost	21 Aug 2007	Pendleton Lane P (Defendant): Appeal Dismissed for the most partAppeal dismissed for the most part and costs fixed at $10,000 with disbursements to be taxed, if parties were unable to agree on the quantum of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia v Dexia Bank: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Public Policy 30 Nov 2006 PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) (Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2006	PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
11	Highness Electrical v Sigma Cable: Repudiatory Breach & Mitigation in Fixed-Price Supply Contract 28 Jun 2006 Highness Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2006	Highness Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia v Dexia Bank: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Conflict 19 Oct 2005 PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) (Applicant)Lost	19 Oct 2005	PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) (Applicant): Motion dismissedThe applicant's motion to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	XACCT Technologies Ltd v Orient Telecommunication Networks: Discovery of Internal Documents 30 Jun 2004 Orient Telecommunication Networks Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jun 2004	Orient Telecommunication Networks Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal AllowedDefendant's appeal against the order for discovery was allowed.
14	Digital Dispatch v Citycab: Arbitration Appeal on Contract Interpretation & Arbitrator's Jurisdiction 15 Jan 2003 Digital Dispatch (ITL) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	15 Jan 2003	Digital Dispatch (ITL) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Appeal AllowedDigital Dispatch (ITL) Pte Ltd's appeal was allowed, granting them leave to appeal against the arbitrator’s decision.
15	Mitsui v PSA Corp & Keppel: Stay of Proceedings under International Arbitration Act 01 Aug 2002 Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	01 Aug 2002	Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedMitsui's appeal against the stay of court proceedings in favour of arbitration was dismissed with costs.
16	Teo Hee Lai v Anwar Siraj: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 04 Jul 2002 Anwar Siraj (Respondent)Lost	04 Jul 2002	Anwar Siraj (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and interim injunction restored. Costs awarded against the respondent in the amount of $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Lim Choon Lai v Chew Kim Heng: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce 21 Jun 2001 Chew Kim Heng (Respondent)Partial	21 Jun 2001	Chew Kim Heng (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostAppeal partially lost; Mr Chew to receive a 40% share in the sale proceeds of 83 Namly Avenue (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	KCC v Anti Corrosion: Defective Paint Claim & Damages Assessment 13 Jun 2001 Anti-Corrosion Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	13 Jun 2001	Anti-Corrosion Pte Ltd (Defendant): Interlocutory judgment entered against the Plaintiffs for damages to be assessed by the Registrar.Interlocutory judgment entered against the Plaintiffs for damages to be assessed by the Registrar. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Sri Jaya v RHB Bank: Mortgagee's Duty, Negligence, Corporate Veil & Land Sale 09 Oct 2000 Sri Jaya (Sendirian) Berhad (Plaintiff)Won	09 Oct 2000	Sri Jaya (Sendirian) Berhad (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $3,190,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).