Amanda Koh Jia Yi

Amanda Koh Jia Yi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act. Their track record shows a 46.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated expertise across 51 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	11 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	11 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Options to purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Related Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housing Developers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles Board	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Invalid service of payment claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent errors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Severance of adjudication determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Claims by subcontractor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determinations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and bonds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Promissory estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Koh Jia Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amanda Koh Jia Yi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	13 cases	100% of cases	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA & Fraud in Construction Contract Dispute(Sep 2024) TG Master v Tung Kee: Option to Purchase, Deposits, and Extension Fees Dispute(May 2024) Terrenus Energy v Attika Interior: Construction Delay & Defect Dispute(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amanda Koh Jia Yi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	56.2 parties avg	6.2	38%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	62.2 parties avg	2.2	46%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	46.7 parties avg	6.7
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amanda Koh Jia Yi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(38%)	38%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Remanded	1(8%)	8%
Won	6(46%)	46%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,627,730.75	403,081.199 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Remanded: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA & Fraud in Construction Contract Dispute 17 Sep 2024 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Sep 2024	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the decision below in respect of the reduction of $155,160. Garnished sum of $23,668.05 to be returned to Builders Hub Pte Ltd. Costs of the appeal fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements. Costs below fixed at $17,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TG Master v Tung Kee: Option to Purchase, Deposits, and Extension Fees Dispute 01 May 2024 TG Master Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	01 May 2024	TG Master Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedTG Master's appeal was allowed, entitling them to retain the Further Sums and Renovation Costs, and claim unpaid extension fees. The court ordered the Respondents to pay $388,000 in extension fees. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Terrenus Energy v Attika Interior: Construction Delay & Defect Dispute 26 Nov 2023 Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	26 Nov 2023	Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim partially allowedCounterclaim partially allowed; balance of contract sum awarded, subject to deductions. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	JP Nelson v Builders Hub: Setting Aside SOPA Adjudication for Fraud and Premature Application 04 Jul 2023 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 Jul 2023	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent): Review Adjudicated Amount reducedThe Adjudication Review Amount was reduced by the amount of $155,160, and Builders Hub is ordered to repay JP Nelson the sum of $155,160, being the sum that Builders Hub had unlawfully gained by the fraud. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Chwee Wah v Yow Jia Wen: Collective Sale Dispute over Chuan Park En Bloc 25 May 2023 Daven Wu Yungren (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2023	Daven Wu Yungren (Defendant): Objection DismissedObjection to the collective sale dismissed.
6	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA, Termination Clauses & Payment Claims 02 May 2023 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Claimant)Remanded	02 May 2023	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Claimant): Adjudication Determination set aside and remittedThe Adjudication Determination was set aside and remitted to the learned Adjudicator for further determination.
7	LJH Construction v. Chan Bee Cheng: Setting Aside Adjudication for Invalid Service, Fraud, and Natural Justice Breach 19 Sep 2022 Gracie Chan Bee Cheng (Defendant)Won	19 Sep 2022	Gracie Chan Bee Cheng (Defendant): WonApplication to set aside the Adjudication Determination granted.
8	Backho (S) Pte Ltd v KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd: SOPA Dispute over Oral Contract and Adjudication Determination 16 Jan 2022 KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	16 Jan 2022	KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application to set aside the Adjudication Determination and the Order is dismissedKSE's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination and the Order is dismissed.
9	Shimizu Corp v Stargood Construction: Payment Claims & Termination under SOPA 20 Apr 2020 Shimizu Corporation (Appellant, Respondent)Won	20 Apr 2020	Shimizu Corporation (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Stargood to pay Shimizu costs fixed at $25,000 inclusive of disbursements. The costs order below is reversed in favor of Shimizu. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Stargood Construction v Shimizu: SOPA, Adjudication, and Termination of Subcontract 05 Nov 2019 Shimizu Corporation (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2019	Shimizu Corporation (Defendant): Application DismissedDefendant's arguments were not accepted, and the plaintiff's application was allowed.
11	Audi Construction v. Kian Hiap Construction: Security of Payment Act & Validity of Payment Claims 21 Jan 2018 Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Jan 2018	Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements to be paid (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Audi Construction v Kian Hiap Construction: SOPA, Premature Payment Claims & Waiver 10 Jul 2017 Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	10 Jul 2017	Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): WonSummons to set aside adjudication determination allowed.
13	Tactic Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd: Performance Bond Dispute 16 May 2017 Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	16 May 2017	Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application to set aside the Injunction grantedApplication to set aside the Injunction granted; costs of $15,000 (all-in) to be paid by Tactic to Sato Kogyo. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.