Amanda Lim Jia Yan

Amanda Lim Jia Yan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Societies Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Temple Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Lim Jia Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amanda Lim Jia Yan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple: Standing of Unincorporated Association to Sue(May 2016) Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple: Identity of Temple & Unlawful Expulsion Dispute(Jul 2015)
Lee & Lee	2 cases	50% of cases	Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Costs Dispute After Breach of Contract Claim(Jul 2018) Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty Claims(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amanda Lim Jia Yan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	18.0 parties avg	8.0	25%
Partial	18.0 parties avg	8.0	25%
Won	36.0 parties avg	6.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	28.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amanda Lim Jia Yan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	800,000.00	266,666.673 cases	3
USD	18,018,000.00	18,018,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Costs Dispute After Breach of Contract Claim 22 Jul 2018 Long Well Group Limited (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jul 2018	Long Well Group Limited (Plaintiff): Costs awarded against 3rd defendantCosts to be paid by the 3rd defendant to the plaintiffs fixed at $200,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty Claims 15 Mar 2018 Long Well Group Limited (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Mar 2018	Long Well Group Limited (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim for breach of contract allowed against CAMA for US$6,006,000 (calculated as 1/3 of US$18,018,000, as there are three plaintiffs) plus interest. Assumed USD as the monetary amounts are expressed in US dollars.
3	Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple: Standing of Unincorporated Association to Sue 23 May 2016 Chu Sheng Temple (Respondent)Won	23 May 2016	Chu Sheng Temple (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Respondent with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple: Identity of Temple & Unlawful Expulsion Dispute 22 Jul 2015 Chu Sheng Temple (Defendant)Won	22 Jul 2015	Chu Sheng Temple (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.