Ambrose Chia

Ambrose Chia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and company law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ambrose Chia has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Timelines	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Creditors' Meeting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Diminution in Value	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cross-examination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ambrose Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ambrose Chia has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Tan and Molly Lim LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Extension of Timeline for Scheme of Arrangement(Oct 2005) Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement Dispute with Litigant-Members(Sep 2005) Raffles Town Club v Tan Chin Seng: Damages for Breach of Contract & Club Membership Value(Aug 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ambrose Chia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.5
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Other	118.0 parties avg	18.0	20%
Partial	211.0 parties avg	11.0	40%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2005	410.2 parties avg	10.2

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ambrose Chia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Other	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	20,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 121	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Extension of Timeline for Scheme of Arrangement 19 Oct 2005 Plaintiffs (group of members of the Raffles Town Club) (Respondent)Won	19 Oct 2005	Plaintiffs (group of members of the Raffles Town Club) (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application to extend the timelines for the consideration of the scheme proposal and the convening of the meeting to discuss the scheme was dismissed.
2	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement Dispute with Litigant-Members 14 Sep 2005 Litigant-members of Raffles Town Club (Applicants)Lost	14 Sep 2005	Litigant-members of Raffles Town Club (Applicants): Application dismissed on preliminary pointThe litigant-members' application to set aside the orders was dismissed on a preliminary point regarding the authority of their solicitors.
3	Raffles Town Club v Tan Chin Seng: Damages for Breach of Contract & Club Membership Value 22 Aug 2005 Tan Chin Seng (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	22 Aug 2005	Tan Chin Seng (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, damages awarded in the sum of $3,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Damages for Breach of Contract & Loss of Club Amenity 22 Feb 2005 Tan Chin Seng (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Feb 2005	Tan Chin Seng (Plaintiff): Damages awarded for loss of amenityGeneral damages awarded in the sum of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) for loss of amenity and enjoyment of a premier club.
5	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Mareva Injunction, Asset Disclosure, Cross-Examination 05 Aug 2004 Betty Pai alias Pai Sha (Defendant)Other	05 Aug 2004	Betty Pai alias Pai Sha (Defendant): Further affidavit orderedOrdered to file a further affidavit disclosing the whereabouts of the sale proceeds of the property at The Sovereign.