Raffles Town Club v Tan Chin Seng: Damages for Breach of Contract & Club Membership Value

The Singapore Court of Appeal heard cross-appeals in Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd v Tan Chin Seng and Others regarding the assessment of damages for breach of contract. The plaintiffs, founder members of Raffles Town Club (RTC), claimed damages for the club's failure to provide a premier club experience due to over-subscription of memberships. The court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal in part, awarding damages of $3,000 per plaintiff for the diminution in value of their club memberships, and allowed the defendant's appeal in part, removing the compensation awarded under the second head of claim.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed in Part

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Court of Appeal addressed damages for Raffles Town Club's breach of contract, specifically regarding the diminution in value of club memberships.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Raffles Town Club Pte LtdAppellant, RespondentCorporationAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Tan Chin SengRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Lee Ah Sim AlanRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Wong Leong Thong PeterRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Kong Cheong Hin StevenRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Chia Ee Lin EvelynRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Liu Hui NanRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Lim ChooRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Ng Cheng HwaRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Meta Mui Khim IreneRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Yong Kah TeckRespondent, AppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Lai Siu ChiuJudgeNo
Tan Lee MengJudgeNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiffs were founder members of Raffles Town Club (RTC).
  2. RTC's promotional material promised a premier club experience.
  3. The club admitted approximately 19,000 members, far exceeding initial expectations.
  4. Plaintiffs were unaware of the large membership size until March 2001.
  5. The increased membership led to overcrowding and reduced accessibility to club facilities.
  6. The market value of RTC memberships declined significantly after the disclosure of the large membership size.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd v Tan Chin Seng, CA 23/2005, 28/2005, [2005] SGCA 40

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Club opened its premises to members
Disclosure of the Club having close to 19,000 members
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendant breached the implied term of the contract to provide a premier club.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to provide premier club
      • Over-subscription of memberships
  2. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court awarded damages for the diminution in value of the club membership due to the breach, but disallowed additional damages for loss of amenities to avoid double compensation.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Diminution in value of club membership
      • Loss of amenities, accessibility and enjoyment

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Recreation

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd v Tan Chin SengHigh CourtYes[2005] 2 SLR 302SingaporeRefers to the High Court's assessment of damages, which was appealed in this case.
Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd v Tan Chin SengCourt of AppealYes[2003] 3 SLR 307SingaporeThe first appeal where the defendant was held liable for breach of contract. The current judgment refers to the facts and findings of this earlier decision.
Robinson v HarmanCourt of ExchequerYes(1848) 1 Exch 850; 154 ER 363England and WalesCited for the principle that damages for breach of contract should place the injured party in the same position as if the contract had been performed.
Biggin & Co Ltd v Permanite LtdKing's BenchYes[1951] 1 KB 422England and WalesCited for the principle that the court must do its best to determine damages even when clear proof is not possible.
Chaplin v HicksCourt of AppealYes[1911] 2 KB 786England and WalesCited for the principle that the fact that damages cannot be assessed with certainty does not relieve the wrongdoer of the necessity of paying damages for breach of contract.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2004 Rev Ed) O 15 r 12(1)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Premier club
  • Diminution in value
  • Breach of contract
  • Club membership
  • Assessment of damages
  • Eight-club index
  • Market value
  • Membership size

15.2 Keywords

  • Breach of contract
  • Damages
  • Club membership
  • Raffles Town Club
  • Diminution in value
  • Singapore
  • Court of Appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Damages
  • Membership Clubs