Anamah Tan

Anamah Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 10% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anamah Tan has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	10 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	9 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Divorce	7 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Support	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stock Options	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of Court 2021	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anamah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anamah Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ann Tan & Associates	9 cases	90% of cases	UYQ v UYP: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Long Dual-Income Marriage(Jan 2020) AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Maintenance and Division of Matrimonial Assets(Aug 2014) AYL v AYM: Variation of Maintenance Order After Divorce(Nov 2013)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	10% of cases	Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George: Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act & Maintenance Orders(May 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anamah Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (10%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	30%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	30%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anamah Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(30%)	30%
Partial	3(30%)	30%
Won	4(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	17,323,610.00	2,474,801.437 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UYQ v UYP: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Long Dual-Income Marriage 28 Jan 2020 UYQ (Appellant, Defendant)Won	28 Jan 2020	UYQ (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; matrimonial assets divided 67:33 in favor of the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Maintenance and Division of Matrimonial Assets 25 Aug 2014 AYM (Appellant)Partial	25 Aug 2014	AYM (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Judge’s order for maintenance was reduced so that the Husband is to pay a lump sum of $690,000 to the Wife being a sum of $100,000 by way of lump sum maintenance for her and a sum of $590,000 by way of lump sum maintenance for the Children inclusive of their school fees. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	AYL v AYM: Variation of Maintenance Order After Divorce 10 Nov 2013 AYM (Defendant, Husband)Lost	10 Nov 2013	AYM (Defendant, Husband): Lump sum maintenance payment orderedOrdered to pay $1 million as lump sum maintenance to the wife and children (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	AJR v AJS: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance in Divorce 14 Jul 2010 AJS (Defendant)Won	14 Jul 2010	AJS (Defendant): Division of Matrimonial AssetsReceived 80% of the total net value of matrimonial assets available for distribution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	ABP v ABQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute 25 Aug 2009 ABP (Petitioner)Partial	25 Aug 2009	ABP (Petitioner): Share of Serangoon propertyEntitled to 20% of the proceeds from the sale of the Serangoon property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George: Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act & Maintenance Orders 17 May 2006 Lee Pauline Bradnam (Plaintiff)Lost	17 May 2006	Lee Pauline Bradnam (Plaintiff): Registration of Order Set AsidePlaintiff's registration of the Order of the Family Court of Australia relating to the Child Support Agreement is set aside.
7	Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Teck Hock: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance 24 Apr 2001 David Chan Teck Hock (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	24 Apr 2001	David Chan Teck Hock (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partMaintenance to be paid by the Husband for the three children is $4,000 per month for each child, effective from 1 January 2000. The 2nd Maintenance Order ceases to apply with effect from 1 January 2000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Official Assignee v Pua Ai Seok: Issue Estoppel & Property Rights 08 Apr 2001 Lee Ee (Other)Won	08 Apr 2001	Lee Ee (Other): Judgment for RespondentAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Leong Mei Chuan v Chan Teck Hock David: Amendment of Notice of Appeal in Matrimonial Asset Division 07 Feb 2001 Chan Teck Hock David (Respondent)Lost	07 Feb 2001	Chan Teck Hock David (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court allowed the appellant's appeal to amend the notice of appeal.
10	Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Texk Hock: Appeal of Ancillary Orders in Divorce - Division of Dell Stock Options 24 Jul 2000 David Chan Texk Hock (Respondent)Won	24 Jul 2000	David Chan Texk Hock (Respondent): Application to amend the Notice of Appeal was dismissedThe appellant's application to amend the Notice of Appeal was dismissed.