Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Teck Hock: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance
In the High Court of Singapore, Judicial Commissioner Woo Bih Li heard an appeal by Leong Mei Chuan (the Wife) and David Chan Teck Hock (the Husband) regarding the ancillary matters of their divorce, specifically concerning the division of Dell stock options and the amount of maintenance. The court adjusted the maintenance payments, ordering $4,000 per month for each of the three children and $3,000 per month for the Wife, effective from January 1, 2000. The court also affirmed the Wife's entitlement to 15% of the net gain from Dell stock options granted before the Decree Nisi, regardless of whether they were vested or exercised.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal allowed in part.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal concerning the division of matrimonial assets, including Dell stock options, and maintenance payments following a divorce. The court adjusted maintenance and affirmed stock option division.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leong Mei Chuan | Appellant, Petitioner | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | |
David Chan Teck Hock | Respondent, Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Woo Bih Li | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The parties were married on 21 September 1983 and separated on 10 February 1997.
- The Wife petitioned for divorce on 21 November 1997, and a Decree Nisi was granted on 24 September 1998.
- The Husband was employed by Dell Asia and received stock options as part of his compensation.
- The Wife sought a share of the Husband's Dell stock options, including those that were unvested.
- The District Judge awarded the Wife 15% of the gains from exercised Dell stock options but nothing for unvested options.
- The Wife appealed for a larger share of the exercised options and a share of the unvested options.
- The Husband appealed for a reduction in the amount of maintenance payments.
5. Formal Citations
- Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Teck Hock, D 3777/1997, RAS 720013 and 720014 of 2000, [2001] SGHC 80
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Parties married | |
Husband left the matrimonial home | |
Wife petitioned for divorce | |
Wife applied for maintenance | |
First Maintenance Order issued | |
Wife applied for an increase in maintenance | |
Second Maintenance Order issued | |
Decree Nisi granted | |
Effective date for maintenance under District Judge's order | |
District Judge made an Order on various aspects of the ancillaries | |
Husband left Dell Asia | |
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court held that stock options, including unvested ones, are matrimonial assets subject to division.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Valuation of stock options
- Inclusion of unvested stock options
- Indirect contribution to assets
- Maintenance
- Outcome: The court adjusted the maintenance payments, considering the needs of the children and the wife, as well as the husband's income.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Assessment of financial needs
- Earning capacity of parties
- Standard of living during marriage
8. Remedies Sought
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Maintenance Payments
9. Cause of Actions
- Divorce
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Maintenance
10. Practice Areas
- Divorce
- Family Litigation
- Ancillary Matters
11. Industries
- Technology
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yeo Gim Tong Michael v Tianzou | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1996] 2 SLR 1 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that assets acquired after the breakdown of the marriage but before the decree nisi are still considered matrimonial assets. |
Barbara Green v Michael Green | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland | Yes | Barbara Green v Michael Green | Maryland | Cited as authority for the proposition that a stock option is a chose in action and illustrates the use of an if, as, and when order. |
Susy Suryani Santoso v Lee Kong Eng & Alexis Khoo | High Court | Yes | Susy Suryani Santoso v Lee Kong Eng & Alexis Khoo (Divorce 1704/98 and RAS 95 and 96/99) | Singapore | Cited regarding the issue of whether bonuses should be taken into account for maintenance, but distinguished as the Court of Appeal reversed the decision on this point. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Womens Charter (Cap 353) 1997 Edition | Singapore |
s 112(10)(b) of the Womens Charter | Singapore |
s 112(1) of the Womens Charter | Singapore |
s 112(5)(e) of the Womens Charter | Singapore |
Section 69(4) of the Womens Charter (Cap 353) 1997 Edition | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Matrimonial Assets
- Stock Options
- Maintenance
- Decree Nisi
- Vested Options
- Non-Statutory Stock Option
- Choses in action
- If and when order
15.2 Keywords
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- Stock Options
- Maintenance
- Singapore
- Family Law
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Family Law | 90 |
Divorce | 90 |
Matrimonial Assets | 85 |
Child Custody | 80 |
Child Support | 80 |
Succession Law | 30 |
Contract Law | 20 |
Civil Procedure | 15 |
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- Stock Options
- Maintenance