Anandan Bala

Anandan Bala is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 45 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 82.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anandan Bala has demonstrated expertise across 86 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	42 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 42 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	37 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 37 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	30 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 30 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	29 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 29 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	15 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consequences of Prosecution’s non-disclosure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equal protection of the law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fundamental liberties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right to life and personal liberty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Factual Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention to Possess	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Animus Possidendi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Charges	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecution by Attrition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutionality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Identification Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt in the face of the court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Due Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witness gating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Eyewitness testimony	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Elements of crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal statutes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Retraction of Plea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation Plea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reopening of concluded criminal appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard of Proof for Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Dissipation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appropriate sanction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intimidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Powers of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Re-sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Canon Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ecclesiastical Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Internet Sex Crimes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Housebreaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anandan Bala has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anandan Bala has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 38 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	38 cases	84% of cases	Iskandar v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Guidelines for Guilty Pleas in Drug Trafficking Cases(Nov 2024) PP v Iskandar & Farid: Applying Sentencing Guidelines to Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2024) PP v Hashim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2023)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	4 cases	9% of cases	PP v Mohammad Ashik: Methamphetamine Consumption & MDA Interpretation(May 2011) Public Prosecutor v Ismil bin Kadar: Murder, Robbery, and Common Intention(Apr 2009) Madiaalakan v PP: Failure to Provide Breath Sample & Enhanced Penalties Under Road Traffic Act(Oct 2001)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	3 cases	7% of cases	Cheung Kan Lam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Housebreaking with Intent to Commit Theft(Feb 2003) Lim Teck Leng Roland v PP: High Court's Power to Alter Judgment & Deferment of Sentence(Aug 2001) Loganatha Venkatesan v PP: Conspiracy to Commit Murder & Admissibility of Police Statements(Aug 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anandan Bala's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 5 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	7%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Partial	42.5 parties avg	2.5	9%
Won	372.5 parties avg	2.5	82%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2018	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	62.2 parties avg	2.2
2022	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anandan Bala's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(7%)	7%
Neutral	1(2%)	2%
Partial	4(9%)	9%
Won	37(82%)	82%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	177,429.51	88,714.762 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2018	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	6 6	Won: 6 cases (100.0%)
2022	5 14	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 45 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Iskandar v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Guidelines for Guilty Pleas in Drug Trafficking Cases 27 Nov 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Nov 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Upheld in PartAppeal upheld in part with respect to Farid's sentence.
2	PP v Iskandar & Farid: Applying Sentencing Guidelines to Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused were found guilty and sentenced.
3	PP v Hashim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won	11 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Prosecution successfully convicted three of the four accused.
4	Tangaraju Suppiah v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Sentencing 24 Apr 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Apr 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for review was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
5	Muhamad Azmi bin Kamil v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Methamphetamine under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Oct 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Oct 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant.
6	Adeeb Ahmed Khan v Public Prosecutor: Extension of Time to Appeal Sentence for Drug Offences Denied 11 Sep 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Sep 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal against his sentence.
7	Nazeri bin Lajim v Attorney-General: Constitutional Rights, Equal Protection, and Stay of Execution 20 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	20 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed in favor of the Attorney-General.
8	PP v Muhammad Hakam: Trafficking Cannabis - Sentencing 06 Jul 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	06 Jul 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence imposedAccused sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
9	Mohamed Shalleh v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Knowledge 13 Mar 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence of death.
10	Muhammad Amirul Aliff v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 27-Year Sentence for Importing Cannabis 04 May 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 May 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original sentence.
11	Nazeri bin Lajim v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application for Drug Trafficking Conviction 19 Apr 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Apr 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's application for review.
12	Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah v Public Prosecutor: Review of Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Apr 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Apr 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for review was dismissed.
13	Abdul Karim v Public Prosecutor: Dual Charging Practice under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Mar 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Mar 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
14	Abdul Kahar v Public Prosecutor: Confiscation Order for Drug Trafficking Benefits 29 Mar 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Mar 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Confiscation Order UpheldThe court upheld the confiscation order for $167,429.51 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Khartik Jasudass v Public Prosecutor: Review of Conviction for Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Feb 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe Criminal Motion was dismissed summarily.
16	Mohamed Shalleh v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Additional Evidence, Knowledge of Drugs 29 Dec 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Dec 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original verdict affirmedThe court affirmed its original verdict of guilt.
17	Saravanan Chandaram v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Cannabis and Cannabis Mixture under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Apr 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Partial	28 Apr 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): Partial LossConviction for Importation of Cannabis Mixture Charge set aside.
18	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Shalleh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Apr 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Apr 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of drug trafficking.
19	Public Prosecutor v Lingkesvaran Rajendaren: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both Lingkesvaran Rajendaren and Alfian bin Abdul Rahim on charges of drug trafficking.
20	Sukla Lalatendu v Public Prosecutor: Retraction of Guilty Plea and Sentencing Appeal 02 Sep 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Won	02 Sep 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): Application GrantedThe Prosecution's application to admit the Affidavit as additional evidence in CM 12 was granted.
21	PP v Zulkarnain: Misuse of Drugs Act Trafficking & Abetment Case 15 Jul 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	15 Jul 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of all three accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured convictions against all three accused individuals.
22	PP v Ravan: Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing for Cannabis Trafficking 25 Apr 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Apr 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentences imposedSentences of imprisonment and caning were imposed on all three accused persons.
23	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process 14 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion dismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's criminal motion.
24	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Jul 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Jul 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
25	Pham Duyen Quyen v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Jun 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jun 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction and Sentence AffirmedThe Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court's decision on conviction and sentence.
26	Micheal Anak Garing v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction and Sentencing Appeal 26 Feb 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	26 Feb 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against Tony Anak Imba's sentence dismissed.
27	Obeng Comfort v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act - Importation of Methamphetamine 14 Feb 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Feb 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe conviction and sentence of the Appellant were upheld.
28	Public Prosecutor v BAC: Culpable Homicide and Mental Depression in Child's Death 30 Mar 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Mar 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of 5 years imprisonment imposedThe accused was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
29	Public Prosecutor v Christeen Jayamany & Datchinamurthy Kataiah: Trafficking Diamorphine, Knowledge of Drugs, Courier Exception 07 May 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	07 May 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused persons on charges of drug trafficking.
30	Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Sentencing for Murder with Common Intention 19 Apr 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	19 Apr 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialDeath penalty imposed on Micheal Anak Garing, but not on Tony Anak Imba.
31	Muhammad bin Kadar v PP: Re-Sentencing for Murder under Penal Code s 302 28 Sep 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Sep 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence AffirmedThe court affirmed the sentence of death imposed on the applicant.
32	Bhavashbhai v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Misuse of Drugs Act Conviction 16 Mar 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Mar 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the criminal revision application.
33	Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Joint Intention in Fatal Robbery 19 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused.
34	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal 07 Mar 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	07 Mar 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal allowed the First Appellant's appeal, finding that he rebutted the presumption in s 18(2) of the MDA on a balance of probabilities.
35	Tan Kheng Chun Ray v PP: Drug Importation & Consumption under Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Feb 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	02 Feb 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially DeniedThe Court of Appeal reduced the sentence.
36	Mohammad Ashik v PP: Statutory Interpretation of Misuse of Drugs Act & Admissibility of Evidence 06 Sep 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Sep 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, upholding the appellant's conviction.
37	PP v Mohammad Ashik: Methamphetamine Consumption & MDA Interpretation 02 May 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 May 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): WonAccused found guilty as charged.
38	Public Prosecutor v Ismil bin Kadar: Murder, Robbery, and Common Intention 06 Apr 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	06 Apr 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment reservedThe court reserved judgment.
39	Re Seed Nigel John QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Queen's Counsel, Criminal Breach of Trust, Canon Law 20 Aug 2003 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	20 Aug 2003	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Attorney-General successfully opposed the application to admit Nigel John Seed QC.
40	Cheung Kan Lam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Housebreaking with Intent to Commit Theft 17 Feb 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	17 Feb 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction.
41	Madiaalakan v PP: Failure to Provide Breath Sample & Enhanced Penalties Under Road Traffic Act 30 Oct 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	30 Oct 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced.
42	Tay Kim Kuan v Public Prosecutor: Internet Sex, Underaged Girl, Sentencing Appeal 27 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld, and the appellant's sentence was enhanced to 12 months' imprisonment and a fine of $10,000 was imposed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
43	Lim Teck Leng Roland v PP: High Court's Power to Alter Judgment & Deferment of Sentence 23 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe motion to further postpone the applicant's sentence was dismissed.
44	Public Prosecutor v Sim Kwong Choon: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	11 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): GuiltyAccused found guilty on both charges.
45	Loganatha Venkatesan v PP: Conspiracy to Commit Murder & Admissibility of Police Statements 14 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions on appeal.