Re Seed Nigel John QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Queen's Counsel, Criminal Breach of Trust, Canon Law

The High Court of Singapore heard an application in Re Seed Nigel John QC on August 21, 2003, to admit Mr. Nigel John Seed QC as an advocate and solicitor for the defense of Father Joachim Kang in a criminal breach of trust case. Father Kang, a Roman Catholic priest, was charged with multiple counts of criminal breach of trust involving church funds. The applicant argued that the case's complexity, involving Canon Law and intricate financial transactions, warranted the admission of a Queen's Counsel. The court dismissed the application, finding that the case was not sufficiently complex and that local counsel could adequately handle the legal and factual issues.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Application to admit Queen's Counsel for criminal breach of trust case involving a Catholic priest and Canon Law was dismissed due to lack of complexity.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Nigel John Seed QCApplicantIndividualApplication dismissedLostPeter Cuthbert Low, Khoo Guan Chuan
Attorney-GeneralRespondentGovernment AgencyApplication dismissedWonAnandan Bala, Kwek Lou Winn
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyApplication dismissedWonAnandan Bala, Kwek Lou Winn
Law Society of SingaporeRespondentStatutory BoardApplication dismissedWonLaurence Goh Eng Yau

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Peter Cuthbert LowPeter Low, Tang & Belinda Ang
Khoo Guan ChuanPeter Low, Tang & Belinda Ang
Anandan BalaAttorney-General's Chambers
Kwek Lou WinnAttorney-General's Chambers
Laurence Goh Eng YauLaurence Goh Eng Yau & Co

4. Facts

  1. Father Joachim Kang, a Roman Catholic priest, was charged with 19 counts of criminal breach of trust.
  2. The charges involve a total of about $5.1 million over the period from 1994 to 2002.
  3. The funds belonged to the Church of St. Teresa, where Father Kang was the parish priest.
  4. The prosecution argued that Father Kang acted dishonestly when he transferred church funds to his personal bank accounts.
  5. The defense argued that Father Kang's actions were permissible under Canon Law.
  6. The applicant sought to admit Mr Nigel John Seed QC as defense counsel.
  7. The Law Society and Attorney-General opposed the admission of the QC.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Re Seed Nigel John QC, OM 20/2003, [2003] SGHC 177

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Father Joachim Kang ordained as a Roman Catholic priest.
Father Joachim Kang appointed parish priest of the Church of St. Teresa.
Father Joachim Kang appointed parish priest of the Church of the Holy Trinity.
Decision date of the application to admit Mr Nigel John Seed QC.
Trial in the Subordinate Courts scheduled to begin.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel
    • Outcome: The court held that the requirements of section 21 of the Legal Profession Act were not satisfied and dismissed the application.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Difficulty and complexity of the case
      • Special qualifications or experience of the Queen's Counsel
      • Special reason for admission in a criminal case
  2. Freedom of Religion
    • Outcome: The court found no issue in the case relating to the right of the priest to profess, practise and propagate his religion or any challenge to the right of the Catholic Church to manage its own religious affairs.
    • Category: Constitutional
  3. Right to be Defended by Legal Practitioner of Choice
    • Outcome: The court held that section 21 LPA is not a mere formality and the court must consider the various matters set out in sub-sections (1) and (2).
    • Category: Constitutional

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Admission of Queen's Counsel as advocate and solicitor

9. Cause of Actions

  • Criminal Breach of Trust

10. Practice Areas

  • Ad Hoc Admission
  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • Religious Institutions

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Re Caplan Jonathan Michael QCHigh CourtYes[1998] 1 SLR 432SingaporeCited for the three-stage test for ad hoc admission of Queen's Counsel.
Re Sir Allan David Green QCN/AYesRe Sir Allan David Green QC (OM 20/96)SingaporeCited as an example of a case with 'special reasons' for admitting Queen's Counsel.
Wayne Kaskiw v Pornbacher and othersSupreme Court of British ColumbiaYes[1997] 32 BCLR (3d) 360 (BCSC)British ColumbiaCited as a case concerning sexual assault by a priest and involving the issue of vicarious liability of the Bishop of Nelson, Corporation Sole.
Re Residential SchoolsCourt of Queen's Bench of AlbertaYes[2000] ABQB 45AlbertaCited as a case involving actions commenced by former residents of Indian residential schools for unlawful confinement and abuse.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Legal Profession ActSingapore
Legal Profession ActSingapore
Penal CodeSingapore
Roman Catholic Archbishop Act (Chapter 375)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Queen's Counsel
  • Ad Hoc Admission
  • Criminal Breach of Trust
  • Canon Law
  • Special Reason
  • Difficulty and Complexity
  • Ecclesiastical Practice
  • Parish Priest
  • Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Singapore

15.2 Keywords

  • Queen's Counsel
  • Ad Hoc Admission
  • Criminal Breach of Trust
  • Canon Law
  • Singapore High Court
  • Legal Profession Act

16. Subjects

  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Legal Profession

17. Areas of Law

  • Constitutional Law
  • Legal Profession
  • Criminal Law