Andre Arul

Andre Arul is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 29 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in estate administration and assessment of legal costs. Their track record shows a 34.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 31% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andre Arul has demonstrated expertise across 109 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Horse Racing Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Services	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compromise Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oil and Gas Concession Project	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inheritance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money had and received	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Club Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Release	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Secret Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Horse Racing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sports Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stakeholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consequential losses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andre Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andre Arul has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 19 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Arul Chew & Partners	19 cases	66% of cases	Sinolanka Hotels v Interna Contract: Dispute over Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction(Jul 2018) Premiere Visione Resources v Lim Choo Sun: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Duties(Oct 2010) Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi(Jan 2010)
Arul Chew and Partners	8 cases	28% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Lim Chor Pee: Bankruptcy Act, Statutory Demands & Solicitors' Costs(Mar 2006) Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Chor Pee & Partners: Legal Fee Agreement Dispute(Dec 2005) Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Lim Chor Pee: Appeal on Setting Aside Statutory Demands Under Bankruptcy Act(Aug 2005)
C Arul & Partners	2 cases	7% of cases	Lau Liat Meng & Co v Lum Kai Keng: Taxation of Paid Bill of Costs for Legal Services(May 2003) Lau Liat Meng & Co v Lum Kai Keng: Review of Taxation of Costs and Interim Bills(Jul 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andre Arul's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 9 (31%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	163.6 parties avg	3.6	55%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	26.3 parties avg	6.3	7%
Won	103.6 parties avg	3.6	34%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2001	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2003	64.9 parties avg	4.9
2004	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andre Arul's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	16(55%)	55%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	2(7%)	7%
Won	10(34%)	34%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,662,546.54	291,409.1616 cases	16
USD	600,200.00	600,200.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%)
2002	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2003	6 114	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	5 23	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 29 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sinolanka Hotels v Interna Contract: Dispute over Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction 05 Jul 2018 Sinolanka Hotels & Spa (Private) Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jul 2018	Sinolanka Hotels & Spa (Private) Limited (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed and ordered to pay costs of S$15,000 to the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Premiere Visione Resources v Lim Choo Sun: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Duties 28 Oct 2010 Premiere Visione Resources Inc Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Oct 2010	Premiere Visione Resources Inc Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's entire claim against the defendant was dismissed with costs to be taxed on a standard basis.
3	Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi 28 Jan 2010 Loh Chong Yong Thomas (Respondent)Lost	28 Jan 2010	Loh Chong Yong Thomas (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found against the respondent. Costs to be borne by each party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ahuja v Sutisna: Option to Purchase, Property Sale Dispute 27 Dec 2007 Sukanda Sutisna (Defendant)Lost	27 Dec 2007	Sukanda Sutisna (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; the court declared that the Defendant had granted the Plaintiffs a valid option to purchase the property and that the Plaintiffs had validly exercised the option, forming a binding agreement for the sale. Costs awarded to the Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Secret Trusts & Estate Distribution Dispute 21 Nov 2007 Low Ah Cheow (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Nov 2007	Low Ah Cheow (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for property known as 1A Wiltshire Road and 186,740 shares of Mr Ng in the holding company dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Lim Chor Pee: Bankruptcy Act, Statutory Demands & Solicitors' Costs 01 Mar 2006 Lim Chor Pee (Respondent)Won	01 Mar 2006	Lim Chor Pee (Respondent): Application to set aside statutory demand grantedThe respondent's application to set aside the statutory demand was granted.
7	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Chor Pee & Partners: Legal Fee Agreement Dispute 05 Dec 2005 Chor Pee & Partners (Respondent)Lost	05 Dec 2005	Chor Pee & Partners (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that an agreement existed for a lump sum fee. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Lim Chor Pee: Appeal on Setting Aside Statutory Demands Under Bankruptcy Act 29 Aug 2005 Lim Chor Pee (Respondent)Won	29 Aug 2005	Lim Chor Pee (Respondent): Statutory demand set asideThe statutory demand against Lim Chor Pee was set aside.
9	Chor Pee & Partners v Wee Soon Kim Anthony: Taxation of Legal Costs Dispute 23 May 2005 Chor Pee & Partners (Petitioner)Won	23 May 2005	Chor Pee & Partners (Petitioner): Petition grantedPetition for leave to tax bills of costs granted with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca: Estate Distribution & Costs Dispute 03 May 2005 Ong Jane Rebecca (Respondent)Won	03 May 2005	Ong Jane Rebecca (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of the appeal to be paid by Lim Lie Hoa. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Estate Assets & Breach of Trust 18 Jan 2005 Ong Jane Rebecca (Appellant)Lost	18 Jan 2005	Ong Jane Rebecca (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal was dismissed.
12	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application to Expunge Documents from Record of Appeal 26 Aug 2004 Ong Jane Rebecca (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Aug 2004	Ong Jane Rebecca (Appellant, Plaintiff): Application dismissedAppellant's application to include certain documents in the record of appeal was dismissed.
13	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution 15 Jun 2004 Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jun 2004	Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the orders of the AR in respect of the valuation of the Estate’s assets and the second defendant’s share (and consequently, the plaintiff’s) in the Estate was dismissed.
14	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Dispute over Gift of Moneys in Bank Accounts 23 Sep 2003 Won Siok Wan (Defendant)Won	23 Sep 2003	Won Siok Wan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with costs.
15	Bernard Desker Gary v Thwaites Racing: Negligence, Conversion, and Contractual Terms in Racehorse Training 14 Aug 2003 Thwaites Racing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	14 Aug 2003	Thwaites Racing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial LossJudgment against the defendant on the claim of conversion; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Estate Inquiry Costs & Judgment 29 Jun 2003 Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jun 2003	Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffFinal judgment against the First Defendant for S$2,321,770.27 with interest. Entitled to a one-twelfth share of the Deceased’s interest in the piece of land in Cibenong, a one-twelfth share of the Deceased’s interest in the jute plantation in Lampung and a one-twelfth share of the Deceased’s interest in a bank account in the United States of America. Costs of the inquiry to be paid by the First Defendant, with certain exceptions.
17	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution 12 Jun 2003 Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jun 2003	Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff in the amount of $2,321,770.27 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Lau Liat Meng & Co v Lum Kai Keng: Taxation of Paid Bill of Costs for Legal Services 27 May 2003 Lau Liat Meng & Co (Appellant)Won	27 May 2003	Lau Liat Meng & Co (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the decision below is set aside and the award of the assistant registrar is restored. The firm shall have the costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Amendment of Defence & Illegality in Trust Claim 29 Apr 2003 Won Siok Wan (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2003	Won Siok Wan (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 to the Plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Korea Jonmyong Trading Co v Sea-shore Transportation: Breach of Contract & Remoteness of Damage 21 Nov 2002 Korea Jonmyong Trading Co (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Nov 2002	Korea Jonmyong Trading Co (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment was entered in JY’s favour for USD600,200 as damages for breach of contract. The claim for consequential losses was dismissed.
21	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Forum Non Conveniens & Trust over Joint Accounts 27 Aug 2002 Won Siok Wan (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	27 Aug 2002	Won Siok Wan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision refusing a stay of the action was dismissed, with costs fixed at $3000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Lau Liat Meng & Co v Lum Kai Keng: Review of Taxation of Costs and Interim Bills 24 Jul 2002 Lau Liat Meng & Co (Applicant)Lost	24 Jul 2002	Lau Liat Meng & Co (Applicant): Application DismissedThe application of Lau Liat Meng & Co was dismissed.
23	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Extension of Time to File Defence Pending Appeal on Stay of Proceedings 16 Jun 2002 Won Siok Wan (Defendant)Won	16 Jun 2002	Won Siok Wan (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal for an extension of time to file her Defence until she exhausted all avenues of appeal was allowed.
24	Hamzah Bin Mohd Noor v Tunku Ibrahim Ismail: Forum Non Conveniens in Contract Dispute 26 Sep 2001 Datuk Hamzah Bin Mohd Noor (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Sep 2001	Datuk Hamzah Bin Mohd Noor (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and the stay of proceedings was upheld.
25	Datuk Hamzah v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 26 Sep 2001 Datuk Hamzah Bin Mohd Noor (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Sep 2001	Datuk Hamzah Bin Mohd Noor (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and the stay of proceedings was upheld.
26	Andre Ravindran v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Enforceability of Legal Fees in Cross-Border Engagements 31 Jul 2001 Andre Ravindran S Arul (Respondent, Plaintiff)Neutral	31 Jul 2001	Andre Ravindran S Arul (Respondent, Plaintiff): Claim Not StayedThe court refused to stay the proceedings in Singapore.
27	Ang Ah Lah Richard v Singapore Turf Club: Disqualification of Horse Trainer for Doping 09 Apr 2001 Ang Ah Lah Richard alias Richard Ang Ah Lah (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Apr 2001	Ang Ah Lah Richard alias Richard Ang Ah Lah (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Richard Ang v Singapore Turf Club: Interim Injunction Against Disqualification 22 Sep 2000 Richard Ang Ah Lah (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Sep 2000	Richard Ang Ah Lah (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for an interim injunction was dismissed.
29	Arul Chandran v William J. Gartshore: Breach of Contract & Unlawful Removal from Tanglin Club Committee 09 Mar 2000 Arul Chandran (Plaintiff)Won	09 Mar 2000	Arul Chandran (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffNominal damages of $1 awarded against each defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).