Andrea Gan

Andrea Gan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and medical negligence. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrea Gan has demonstrated expertise across 46 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Agents Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Surgical procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Spinal Surgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Agents (Estate Agency Work) Regulations 2010	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrea Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrea Gan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	5 cases	56% of cases	Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Equitable Compensation(Sep 2016) Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director Liability(Nov 2015) Chua Thong Jiang Andrew v Yue Wai Mun: Joinder of Parties & Vicarious Liability in Medical Negligence(Jun 2015)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	44% of cases	Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Costs Allocation After Breach of Contract Dispute(Apr 2022) Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Building Contract Dispute over Lump Sum Contract and Sub-contractor Claims(Aug 2020) Independent State of Papua New Guinea v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Corporate Governance Dispute(Apr 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrea Gan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Partial	52.8 parties avg	2.8	56%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrea Gan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(11%)	11%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	5(56%)	56%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
HKD	58,255,390.28	29,127,695.142 cases	2
SGD	423,442.65	84,688.535 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Costs Allocation After Breach of Contract Dispute 05 Apr 2022 COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	05 Apr 2022	COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $388,442.65 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) and costs of $151,805.95. The plaintiff was deprived of 50% of its costs.
2	Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Building Contract Dispute over Lump Sum Contract and Sub-contractor Claims 05 Aug 2020 COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	05 Aug 2020	COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim dismissed in partPlaintiff's claim to recover overpayment under the Comfort Contract from the first defendant is dismissed. Plaintiff's claim to recover $86,606.41 from the first defendant is dismissed. Plaintiff's claim against the second defendant is dismissed.
3	Independent State of Papua New Guinea v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Corporate Governance Dispute 01 Apr 2019 PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Defendant)Won	01 Apr 2019	PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Adjudication, Construction Act & Payment Claims 12 Apr 2018 COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Appellant)Lost	12 Apr 2018	COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $25,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Equitable Compensation 08 Sep 2016 Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	08 Sep 2016	Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding post-judgment interest calculations. The base value of the shares before interest is HKD16,127,325.94. Post-judgment pre-liquidation interest should run for six years (ie, from 2001-04-06 to 2007-04-05) instead of four years, with the applicable rate to be 5% per annum. Post-judgment post-liquidation interest should be awarded at the HK post-judgment rate of 8% per annum from 2009-12-22, the date on which liquidators were appointed.
6	Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director Liability 05 Nov 2015 Dynasty Line Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Nov 2015	Dynasty Line Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentJudgment in favour of the Plaintiff for HK$6,569,636.89 against Sia and Lee jointly and severally for the Commerzbank Pledge, and HK$35,558,427.45 against Sia for the other three pledges, plus pre-liquidation interest of 5% per annum over four years on both sums. Post-liquidation interest will only be claimable if Dynasty has a surplus of assets after paying all claims in its liquidation. Assumed HKD as the case was heard in relation to CDC shares, a company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
7	Chua Thong Jiang Andrew v Yue Wai Mun: Joinder of Parties & Vicarious Liability in Medical Negligence 28 Jun 2015 Yue Wai Mun (Defendant)Neutral	28 Jun 2015	Yue Wai Mun (Defendant): Reasons for suing both defendants deemed insufficientThe court found the plaintiff's reasons for suing both Dr. Yue and SGHPL to be insufficient.
8	Chua Thong Jiang Andrew v Yue Wai Mun: Negligence in Spine Surgery 03 May 2015 Yue Wai Mun (Defendant)Won	03 May 2015	Yue Wai Mun (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the first defendant, Dr. Yue, was dismissed.
9	Ghazali bin Mohamed Rasul v PP: Estate Agent Offences under EAR 2010 24 Jul 2014 Ghazali bin Mohamed Rasul (Appellant)Partial	24 Jul 2014	Ghazali bin Mohamed Rasul (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe fines were reduced from $10,000 to $5,000 for the introduction charge and from $8,000 to $3,000 for the referral fee charge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).