Andrew John Hanam

Andrew John Hanam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 31.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated expertise across 65 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Licensing Regime	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Goods and Services Tax (GST)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Particular causes of action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim payments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sufficiency of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
All moneys clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew John Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew John Hanam has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Andrew LLC	11 cases	85% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v. Hanam: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Professional Conduct(May 2023) Pakirisamy Rajoo v Sheila Devi: Setting Aside Dismissal of Claim Due to Absence at Trial(Nov 2022) Medica Singapore Pte Ltd v Chabtini Elias Georges: Dispute over SRS Mark Ownership and Breach of Fiduciary Duties(Sep 2022)
PKWA Law Practice LLC	1 cases	8% of cases	Lie Hendri Rusli v Wong Tan and Molly Lim: Solicitor's Duty, Conflict of Interest, and Mortgage Advice(Sep 2004)
Andrew & Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Ah So Etee v Fan Moli: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance(Aug 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew John Hanam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.0 parties avg	2.0	54%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	15%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew John Hanam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(54%)	54%
Partial	2(15%)	15%
Won	4(31%)	31%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,344,850.90	122,259.1711 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society of Singapore v. Hanam: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Professional Conduct 09 May 2023 Hanam, Andrew John (Respondent)Lost	09 May 2023	Hanam, Andrew John (Respondent): SanctionedMr. Hanam sanctioned and suspended for 9 months and ordered to pay costs of $32,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Pakirisamy Rajoo v Sheila Devi: Setting Aside Dismissal of Claim Due to Absence at Trial 08 Nov 2022 Sheila Devi d/o Pakirisamy Rajoo (Defendant)Won	08 Nov 2022	Sheila Devi d/o Pakirisamy Rajoo (Defendant): Summons DismissedSummons to set aside the dismissal of the claim was dismissed; costs of the application awarded to the defendant fixed at $4,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Medica Singapore Pte Ltd v Chabtini Elias Georges: Dispute over SRS Mark Ownership and Breach of Fiduciary Duties 27 Sep 2022 Medica Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2022	Medica Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Mr. Chabtini was ordered to take steps for the registration of the SRS Mark to be transferred back to Medica SG’s name in Taiwan and Indonesia and to compensate Medica SG in the sum of $5,850.90, being the cost of the transfers that Medica SG was able to reverse on its own. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Pua Om Tee v Public Prosecutor: GST Evasion Sentencing Framework 18 May 2022 Pua Om Tee (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	18 May 2022	Pua Om Tee (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe accused's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
5	P & P Engineering v Kori Construction: Application for Interim Payment 25 Jun 2019 P & P Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	25 Jun 2019	P & P Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for interim payment dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
6	Eastern Resource Management Services Ltd v Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Consideration, Duress, Illegality 29 Jan 2019 Eastern Resource Management Services Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jan 2019	Eastern Resource Management Services Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedERMS's claim against Chiu Teng was dismissed.
7	Poh Leong Soon v SL Hair & Beauty: Winding Up Application Based on Director's Conduct and Just & Equitable Grounds 26 Apr 2018 Poh Leong Soon (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Poh Leong Soon (Plaintiff): Application DismissedWinding up application dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Ong Teck Soon v Ong Teck Seng: Conversion, Unjust Enrichment & Limitation 04 May 2017 Ong Teck Soon (executor of the estate of Ong Kim Nang, deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	04 May 2017	Ong Teck Soon (executor of the estate of Ong Kim Nang, deceased) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffRestitution of the sum of $1,113,000 ordered. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Nam Hong Construction v Kori Construction: Building Control Act & Licensing for Specialist Building Works 07 Jul 2016 Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	07 Jul 2016	Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Nam Hong's claim in DC Suit 3508 is not precluded by s 29B(4) of the Building Control Act. The court also awarded costs of the appeal and of the hearing before the Judicial Commissioner to Nam Hong (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Kori Construction v Nam Hong Construction: Interpretation of 'Structural Steelwork' under Building Control Act 29 Jan 2015 Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	29 Jan 2015	Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of the appeal and the hearing below to Kori (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Teddy, Thomas v Teacly (S) Pte Ltd: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury 05 Nov 2014 Teddy, Thomas (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	05 Nov 2014	Teddy, Thomas (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part. The awards made by the AR in respect of loss of pre-trial earnings and loss of future earnings were set aside. Instead, the plaintiff was awarded $180,000 as loss of earning capacity (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Ah So Etee v Fan Moli: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance 28 Aug 2008 Ah So Etee (alias Chua Ming Soo) (Petitioner)Partial	28 Aug 2008	Ah So Etee (alias Chua Ming Soo) (Petitioner): PartialHusband's petition granted; ordered to pay arrears and lump sum maintenance to Wife.
13	Lie Hendri Rusli v Wong Tan and Molly Lim: Solicitor's Duty, Conflict of Interest, and Mortgage Advice 22 Sep 2004 Lie Hendri Rusli (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Sep 2004	Lie Hendri Rusli (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.