Andy Leck

Andy Leck is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and escrow agreements. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 31% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andy Leck has demonstrated expertise across 67 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	13 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Blocking orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Border Enforcement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Counterfeit Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inverse Passing Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bonus Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Further and better particulars	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andy Leck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andy Leck has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	15 cases	94% of cases	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Document Production, Relevance, and Legal Privilege(Sep 2019) Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Dispute over Pleadings and Requests for Further and Better Particulars(Nov 2018) Disney v M1: Copyright Infringement & Blocking Orders for Online Film Piracy(Sep 2018)
Wong and Leow LLC	1 cases	6% of cases	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order(Aug 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andy Leck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 5 (31%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	55.0 parties avg	5.0	31%
Partial	42.8 parties avg	2.8	25%
Won	79.2 parties avg	9.2	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2006	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	213.3 parties avg	13.3
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andy Leck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(31%)	31%
Partial	4(25%)	25%
Won	7(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	80,000.00	7,272.7311 cases	11
USD	302,184.00	302,184.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Document Production, Relevance, and Legal Privilege 09 Sep 2019 Hadiran Sridjaja (Defendant)Partial	09 Sep 2019	Hadiran Sridjaja (Defendant): PartialThe court ordered production of documents relating to the sharing of liabilities arising out of any guarantee and/or exit option demanded by EDBI in respect of the Initial PCOA, but declined to order production in respect of Request 11 and Request 12. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Dispute over Pleadings and Requests for Further and Better Particulars 11 Nov 2018 Hadiran Sridjaja (Defendant)Lost	11 Nov 2018	Hadiran Sridjaja (Defendant): Order to provide further and better particularsThe defendant was ordered to provide further and better particulars of the defence and to pay the plaintiffs’ costs of the application, assessed at S$3,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Disney v M1: Copyright Infringement & Blocking Orders for Online Film Piracy 18 Sep 2018 Disney Enterprises, Inc. (Plaintiff)Won	18 Sep 2018	Disney Enterprises, Inc. (Plaintiff): Orders GrantedBlocking orders granted, including a dynamic injunction with modified terms.
4	Louis Vuitton v. Megastar Shipping: Trade Mark Infringement & Border Enforcement 23 Nov 2017 SANRIO COMPANY, LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Nov 2017	SANRIO COMPANY, LTD (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for trade mark infringement dismissed; costs awarded to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Astrata v Portcullis: Escrow Agreement Dispute over AGI's Chapter 11 Reorganisation 28 Apr 2011 Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	28 Apr 2011	Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partApplication for leave to appeal granted and declared that Tridex is not entitled to delivery of the Escrow Property; appeals dismissed.
6	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 10 Apr 2011 Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant)Partial	10 Apr 2011	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant): Leave to commence derivative proceedings granted in partLeave granted to commence derivative proceedings on claims related to KSCCI, Ribands, and Mega-Bond.
7	Littau v Astrata: Interim Injunction & Non-Compete Agreement Dispute 09 Dec 2010 Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	09 Dec 2010	Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore.Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore. The court ordered costs at 90% to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, the deduction of 10% being the costs attributed to the arguments on the Riddick principle. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Portcullis Escrow v Astrata: Leave to Appeal Refused on Escrow Agreement Interpretation 11 Oct 2010 Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Oct 2010	Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): LostLeave to appeal the Declaration in Originating Summons No 690 not granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Taxation of Costs Dispute After Settlement Agreement 20 Oct 2008 Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Oct 2008	Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffOrder for costs of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Britestone v Smith: Breach of Contract & Damages for Defective Capacitors 27 Sep 2007 Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Sep 2007	Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the Respondent; appeal dismissed with costs.
11	QB Net Co Ltd v Earnson Management: Inverse Passing Off, Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy 16 Oct 2006 QB Net Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Oct 2006	QB Net Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Action DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to the three defendants to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Smith & Associates v Britestone: Breach of Contract & Damages for Counterfeit Electronic Components 12 Oct 2006 Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	12 Oct 2006	Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $302,184 (USD).
13	Caterpillar Inc v Ong Eng Peng: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off 03 Apr 2006 Caterpillar Inc (Plaintiff)Won	03 Apr 2006	Caterpillar Inc (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the court granted the injunctions sought to restrain the defendant from infringement of the plaintiff’s CAT marks and from passing off his goods and services as those of the plaintiff. The inquiry as to damages or an account of profits is to be conducted by the Registrar. The plaintiff is also awarded costs of the proceedings up to the stage of trial. Costs pertaining to the inquiry before the Registrar are reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Asian Corporate Services v Eastwest Management: Anton Piller Order & Conspiracy 15 Jan 2006 Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	15 Jan 2006	Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the appellant shall have the costs here and below, with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order 03 Aug 2005 Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Aug 2005	Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Order against the third defendant set asideThe court set aside the Anton Piller order against the third defendant, Impact Pacific Consultants Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Schuler v New Era of Networks: Wrongful Dismissal & Bonus Dispute 18 Sep 2002 New Era of Networks (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	18 Sep 2002	New Era of Networks (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment on CounterclaimJudgment in the sum of $72,000 on the Defendant’s counterclaim, with interest at the usual rate from the date of the filing of the counterclaim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.