Ang Kai Hsiang

Ang Kai Hsiang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and copyrights. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice12% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Innocent Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Kai Hsiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ang Kai Hsiang has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	RecordTV v MediaCorp: Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats, and Time-Shifting Technology(Nov 2010) RecordTV v MediaCorp: Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats, and Time-Shifting(Dec 2009) Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trademark Registration Refusal Appeal(Aug 2009)
Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva LLP	2 cases	25% of cases	Novelty Pte Ltd v Amanresorts Ltd: Passing Off & Well-Known Trade Marks(Mar 2009) Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trade Mark Registration Refusal - Bad Faith & Likelihood of Confusion(Jun 2008)
Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva	2 cases	25% of cases	Amanresorts v Novelty: Passing Off & Trademark Infringement over 'Amanusa' Brand(Nov 2007) Seiko Epson Corp v Sepoms Technology: Patent Infringement & Accounting for Profits(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ang Kai Hsiang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.3 parties avg	4.3	38%
Won	53.0 parties avg	3.0	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	43.6 parties avg	3.6
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ang Kai Hsiang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	285.717 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	RecordTV v MediaCorp: Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats, and Time-Shifting Technology 30 Nov 2010 RecordTV Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	30 Nov 2010	RecordTV Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs; RecordTV is entitled to damages against MediaCorp (to be assessed) and an injunction restraining MediaCorp from making further threats. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	RecordTV v MediaCorp: Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats, and Time-Shifting 20 Dec 2009 RecordTV Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Dec 2009	RecordTV Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendants for groundless threats of copyright infringement fails. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trademark Registration Refusal Appeal 04 Aug 2009 Hyundai Mobis (Respondent)Won	04 Aug 2009	Hyundai Mobis (Respondent): Registration allowedThe respondent was allowed to register the 'MOBIS' trademark.
4	Recordtv v MediaCorp: Groundless Threats & Conspiracy in Copyright Dispute 23 Jun 2009 RecordTV Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	23 Jun 2009	RecordTV Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision to strike out the conspiracy claim was dismissed. The court found no evidence to support the conspiracy claim.
5	Novelty Pte Ltd v Amanresorts Ltd: Passing Off & Well-Known Trade Marks 30 Mar 2009 Amanresorts Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Mar 2009	Amanresorts Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court upheld the High Court's decision that the Respondents' passing off claim and claim under Section 55(3)(a) of the Trade Marks Act had been made out. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trade Mark Registration Refusal - Bad Faith & Likelihood of Confusion 29 Jun 2008 Hyundai Mobis (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2008	Hyundai Mobis (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication for registration of the mark T02/05501Z allowed.
7	Amanresorts v Novelty: Passing Off & Trademark Infringement over 'Amanusa' Brand 26 Nov 2007 Amanresorts Limited (Plaintiff)Won	26 Nov 2007	Amanresorts Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court ordered the defendant to pay 90% of the costs of this action (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Seiko Epson Corp v Sepoms Technology: Patent Infringement & Accounting for Profits 24 May 2007 Seiko Epson Corp (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	24 May 2007	Seiko Epson Corp (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).