Anil Narain Balchandani

Anil Narain Balchandani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and costs. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charitable Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum of costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigant-in-person	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compensation and costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of statute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Purposive approach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Taking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anil Narain Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anil Narain Balchandani has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Red Lion Circle	9 cases	75% of cases	Arif Rahim Valibhoy v Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura: Judicial Review of Trustee Removal(Nov 2023) Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Costs for Dismissed Summonses(Oct 2023) Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Negligence Claim for Suicide of Salvin Foster Steven(Aug 2023)
I.R.B Law LLP	2 cases	17% of cases	Nurun Novi Saydur Rahman v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety & Health Act Violation Resulting in Fatalities(Nov 2018) Mia Mukles v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on WICA Fraudulent Claim & False Statement(Oct 2017)
I.R.B. Law	1 cases	8% of cases	Mathew Koottappillil Mathew v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Sentence(Feb 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anil Narain Balchandani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 4 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Consent	15.0 parties avg	5.0	8%
Lost	62.2 parties avg	2.2	50%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	17%
Won	34.5 parties avg	4.5	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	35.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anil Narain Balchandani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Consent	1(8%)	8%
Lost	6(50%)	50%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Won	3(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,500.00	833.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Consent: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arif Rahim Valibhoy v Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura: Judicial Review of Trustee Removal 30 Nov 2023 Arif Rahim Valibhoy (Applicant)Partial	30 Nov 2023	Arif Rahim Valibhoy (Applicant): Leave granted for judicial reviewLeave was granted for judicial review of the Removal Decision and Costs Decision.
2	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Costs for Dismissed Summonses 12 Oct 2023 Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff)Won	12 Oct 2023	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of $500 awarded to the first plaintiff, to be paid by Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Negligence Claim for Suicide of Salvin Foster Steven 24 Aug 2023 Tan Kin Tee (Plaintiff)Consent	24 Aug 2023	Tan Kin Tee (Plaintiff): Leave to discontinue suit grantedBy consent, the plaintiffs were given leave to discontinue this suit in accordance with the terms of settlement reached between them and the 1st and 3rd defendants.
4	Tan v Tan: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills & Legal Profession Act 03 Mar 2022 Cheryl Tan Yi Lin (Applicant)Lost	03 Mar 2022	Cheryl Tan Yi Lin (Applicant): Originating Summons dismissedThe Applicant's application for an order to tax the Respondent's bills was dismissed.
5	Tan Yi Lin Cheryl v AIA Singapore: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Insurance Claim Denial 02 Dec 2021 Cheryl Tan Yi Lin (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	02 Dec 2021	Cheryl Tan Yi Lin (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay the respondent costs of $50,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Parti Liyani v Public Prosecutor: Compensation for Frivolous Prosecution under Criminal Procedure Code 20 Jun 2021 Parti Liyani (Appellant)Lost	20 Jun 2021	Parti Liyani (Appellant): Application dismissedParti Liyani's application for compensation under s 359(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code was dismissed.
7	Parti Liyani v Public Prosecutor: Application for Leave to Commence Disciplinary Proceedings Against DPPs 22 Oct 2020 Parti Liyani (Applicant)Won	22 Oct 2020	Parti Liyani (Applicant): Application AllowedLeave granted for an investigation to be made into the applicant’s complaint of misconduct against the DPPs.
8	Parti Liyani v Public Prosecutor: Theft Conviction Appeal - Illegal Deployment of Foreign Domestic Worker 03 Sep 2020 Parti Liyani (Appellant)Won	03 Sep 2020	Parti Liyani (Appellant): Appeal AllowedConvictions on all four charges overturned.
9	Bae Junho v Daimwood and London School of Business & Finance: Striking Out Claim for Psychiatric Injury 05 Jun 2019 Junho Bae (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jun 2019	Junho Bae (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against both defendants was struck out.
10	Nurun Novi Saydur Rahman v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety & Health Act Violation Resulting in Fatalities 01 Nov 2018 Nurun Novi Saydur Rahman (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	01 Nov 2018	Nurun Novi Saydur Rahman (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; Prosecution's cross-appeal against sentence allowed.
11	Mia Mukles v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on WICA Fraudulent Claim & False Statement 12 Oct 2017 Mia Mukles (Appellant)Lost	12 Oct 2017	Mia Mukles (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction on two charges was dismissed.
12	Mathew Koottappillil Mathew v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Sentence 23 Feb 2017 Mathew Koottappillil Mathew (Appellant)Partial	23 Feb 2017	Mathew Koottappillil Mathew (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partOriginal sentence of 6 weeks’ imprisonment reduced to 4 weeks’ imprisonment, with the penalty of $1,500 to remain. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.