April Phang

April Phang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 46 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 74.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 2% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

April Phang has demonstrated expertise across 86 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	42 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 42 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	34 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 34 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	27 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 27 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	21 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prospective Overruling	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Embezzlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stimulant-Related Disorder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consequences of Prosecution’s non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Intoxication	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Importation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Caregiver Stress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conservation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Computer Misuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Industry Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
ATM Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Rigging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deceitful Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetting Unlicensed Moneylending	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Firefighting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Intermediaries Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cybercrime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Information Technology Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rioting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	April Phang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

April Phang has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 32 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	32 cases	70% of cases	Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution & Constitutionality of Post-Appeal Applications(Oct 2024) Mohamed Mubin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Drug Trafficking Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2024) Lee Zheng Da Eddie v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2023)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	9 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Law Aik Meng: Computer Misuse Act & Penal Code Sentencing in ATM Card Fraud(Mar 2007) Ng Geok Eng v PP: Market Rigging & Deceitful Practice under Securities and Futures Act(Dec 2006) Public Prosecutor v Choi Guo Hong Edward: Enhanced Punishment for Abetting Unlicensed Moneylending(Dec 2006)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	4 cases	9% of cases	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver(Nov 2001) Kum Mun Hou v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine(May 2001) Lim Siong Khee v Public Prosecutor: Computer Misuse Act & Unauthorized Access to Email Account(Apr 2001)
Prosecution	1 cases	2% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Sulaiman bin Jumari: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of April Phang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 1 (2%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	2%
Partial	72.0 parties avg	2.0	15%
Won	342.2 parties avg	2.2	74%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	52.6 parties avg	2.6
2005	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	62.2 parties avg	2.2
2019	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of April Phang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(9%)	9%
Other	1(2%)	2%
Partial	7(15%)	15%
Won	34(74%)	74%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2006	5 122	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Other: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2018	6 15	Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 5 cases (83.3%)
2019	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 46 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution & Constitutionality of Post-Appeal Applications 14 Oct 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Oct 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissed summarilyThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for a stay of execution.
2	Mohamed Mubin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Drug Trafficking Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act 07 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	07 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside.
3	Lee Zheng Da Eddie v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Nov 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Nov 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeals of both Lee and Yap.
4	PP v Mohamed Mubin: Misuse of Drugs Act & Abnormality of Mind 16 Mar 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	16 Mar 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Successful in opposing the application of s 33B(3)(b) of the MDAThe court determined that s 33B(3)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act was not satisfied.
5	PP v Lee Zheng Da Eddie: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Aug 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Aug 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionLee and Yap were convicted of their respective charges.
6	Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements under the Misuse of Drugs Act 01 Dec 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Dec 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed.
7	PP v Lokman & Mubin: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Abetment by Instigation 09 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won	09 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Conviction of Lokman and MubinLokman was convicted on amended charges and Mubin was convicted on charges of abetment and trafficking.
8	BLV v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault, Abuse of Process & Sentencing 07 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; sentence enhanced for abuse of process.
9	Public Prosecutor v Sulaiman bin Jumari: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	08 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on all charges.
10	Chan Lie Sian v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal - Sudden Fight Defence 29 Jul 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	29 Jul 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, substituting the conviction to one under section 300(c) of the Penal Code and sentencing Chan to life imprisonment.
11	PP v Sinniah: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Mar 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Mar 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted of the charge.
12	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Application of Courier Exception under Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Feb 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Feb 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
13	Adri Anton Kalangie v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Drug Importation and Prospective Overruling 15 Jul 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Jul 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant.
14	PP v Vikneswaren Ramu: Drug Importation Sentencing 07 Jun 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	07 Jun 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence imposedSentence of 20 years and 6 months’ imprisonment, and 15 strokes of the cane imposed on the Accused.
15	Public Prosecutor v S K Murugan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe accused was found guilty and convicted on the charge of trafficking diamorphine.
16	Public Prosecutor v Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar: Drug Trafficking, Retraction of Guilty Plea 20 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Successful ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar for drug trafficking.
17	Public Prosecutor v Lim Chee Yin Jordon: Appeal Against Probation Order for Theft and Rash Driving 28 Feb 2018 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	28 Feb 2018	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the probation order was allowed.
18	Cheang Geok Lin v. Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Excessive Sentencing for Drug Possession and Consumption 03 Jan 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	03 Jan 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful; sentence for Enhanced Possession Charge reduced, sentence of 12 weeks’ imprisonment in lieu of caning set aside, sentence for LT-2 Charge affirmed.
19	PP v Muhammad Nor Haiqal: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 12 Nov 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 Nov 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 24 years' imprisonment and 20 strokes of the cane.
20	Bander Yahya A Alzahrani v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Pending Criminal Reference 08 Nov 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 Nov 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for stay of execution was dismissed.
21	Public Prosecutor v Adri Anton Kalangie: Importation of Methamphetamine 29 Aug 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Aug 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
22	PP v Chan Lie Sian: Murder Conviction for Fatal Dumbbell Attack at Lodging House 20 Aug 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Aug 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused was convicted of murder.
23	Public Prosecutor v BDB: Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt and Ill-treatment of Child 09 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Other	09 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Appeal filed against the sentenceThe Public Prosecutor filed a Notice of Appeal against the sentence.
24	Low Gek Hong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Abuse of Foreign Domestic Worker 14 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentences UpheldThe High Court upheld the sentences imposed by the District Court.
25	PP v Development 26: Conservation Area Violations & Sentencing 12 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	12 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
26	Yap Ah Lai v PP: Smuggling, Customs Act & Excise Duty Evasion 14 Apr 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	14 Apr 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was reduced.
27	Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v PP: Drink Driving Offence & Appropriate Sentencing 29 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	29 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially UpheldThe appeal was partially upheld, resulting in a reduced fine and disqualification period. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Teo Rong Zhi Saimonn v Public Prosecutor: Motor Vehicle Insurance & Third-Party Risks 22 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe conviction of the appellant was upheld.
29	Phang Wah v PP: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act & Public Interest Law 22 Oct 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Oct 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal; the reference was dismissed.
30	Aquaro Massimo v Public Prosecutor: Driving Under Disqualification & Motorcycle Use 11 Jan 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	11 Jan 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulThe appellant's term of imprisonment was reduced from five to two weeks.
31	Ng Chee Tiong Tony v PP: Trial Judge's Inquisitorial Role & Unfair Trial 11 Dec 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 Dec 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; conviction set aside.
32	Public Prosecutor v Law Aik Meng: Computer Misuse Act & Penal Code Sentencing in ATM Card Fraud 06 Mar 2007 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	06 Mar 2007	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced.
33	Ng Geok Eng v PP: Market Rigging & Deceitful Practice under Securities and Futures Act 20 Dec 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	20 Dec 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. Sentence for market rigging altered to six months' imprisonment. Sentences for deceitful practice reduced to fines of $50,000 each (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	Public Prosecutor v Choi Guo Hong Edward: Enhanced Punishment for Abetting Unlicensed Moneylending 10 Dec 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Dec 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Revision AllowedThe High Court allowed the revision and imposed mandatory imprisonment terms.
35	Mohamad Iskandar v PP: Firefighter's Rash Act Causing Death - Sentencing Principles 07 Sep 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	07 Sep 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe appeal was partially dismissed as the sentence was reduced but not fully overturned.
36	Jagatheesan v PP: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal Based on Accomplice Testimony 23 Jul 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	23 Jul 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and the convictions were upheld.
37	R Alagiyasolan v PP: Employing Overstayer Offence under Immigration Act 07 Mar 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Mar 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction of R Alagiyasolan.
38	Robin Anak Mawang v PP: Rioting, Unlawful Assembly, and Witness Testimony 29 Nov 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, and the sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment was not disturbed.
39	Lee Siew Eng Helen v PP: Criminal Breach of Trust & Embezzlement of Insurance Premiums 01 Aug 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Aug 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
40	Sun Hongyu v PP: Unlawful Return to Singapore & Immigration Act Interpretation 12 Apr 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Apr 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner.
41	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver 27 Nov 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Nov 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll three accused persons were found guilty as charged.
42	Kum Mun Hou v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine 08 May 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 May 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking.
43	Lim Siong Khee v Public Prosecutor: Computer Misuse Act & Unauthorized Access to Email Account 08 Apr 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 Apr 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced.
44	Chow Mun Fai v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Possession of Diamorphine 26 Mar 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal upheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Chow Mun Fai's conviction.
45	Public Prosecutor v Sim Kwong Choon: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	11 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): GuiltyAccused found guilty on both charges.
46	Public Prosecutor v Tan Tiew Guay & Chow Mun Fai: Drug Trafficking & Possession 28 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdict for Chow Mun FaiChow Mun Fai was found guilty of possession of 23.21g of heroin for the purposes of trafficking.