Bander Yahya A Alzahrani v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Pending Criminal Reference

Bander Yahya A Alzahrani, a Saudi Arabian diplomat, applied to the High Court of Singapore for a stay of execution on his sentence for outrage of modesty and using criminal force, pending a criminal motion for leave to refer questions to the Court of Appeal. Steven Chong JA dismissed the application, holding that while the court had the power to order a stay of execution, the applicant had not made a good arguable case that there were real questions of law of public interest.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Application for stay of execution by Bander Yahya A Alzahrani, convicted of outrage of modesty, pending a criminal reference. The court dismissed the application.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Bander Yahya A AlzahraniApplicantIndividualApplication DismissedLostPang Giap Oon @ Arif Peter Pang
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyApplication DismissedWonApril Phang, Kenny Yang

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Steven ChongJudge of AppealYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Pang Giap Oon @ Arif Peter PangPeter Pang & Co
April PhangAttorney-General’s Chambers
Kenny YangAttorney-General’s Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The Applicant was convicted of outrage of modesty and using criminal force.
  2. The Applicant appealed against his conviction and sentence, but the appeal was dismissed.
  3. The Applicant applied for a stay of execution pending a criminal motion for leave to refer questions to the Court of Appeal.
  4. The Applicant had already begun serving his sentence at the time of the application.
  5. The Applicant sought to refer three questions to the Court of Appeal, relating to the conduct of his counsel and the need for expert evidence on the victim's state of mind.
  6. The District Judge accepted the victim's evidence without calling for psychiatric evidence.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Bander Yahya A Alzahrani v Public Prosecutor, Criminal Motion No 47 of 2017, [2017] SGHC 287

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Appeal heard; one-week deferment of sentence granted.
Further deferment of sentence requested.
Second deferment of sentence granted until 11 August 2017.
Third deferment of sentence requested.
Third deferment of sentence rejected; Applicant began serving sentence.
Leave Application filed.
Hearing date.
Judgment date.
Leave Application fixed before the Court of Appeal.
Leave Application fixed before the Court of Appeal.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Stay of Execution
    • Outcome: The court held that it had the power to order a stay of execution pending a leave application to bring a criminal reference, even if the applicant had already commenced serving his sentence, but declined to exercise that power in this case.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] SGHC 187
      • [2005] 2 SLR(R) 247
  2. Leave to Refer Questions of Law
    • Outcome: The court found that the questions the Applicant sought to refer to the Court of Appeal did not raise questions of law of public interest.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Stay of execution of sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Rajendar Prasad Rai and another v Public Prosecutor and another matterHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 187SingaporeCited for the principle that the court has the power to stay orders pending a criminal reference.
Ong Beng Leong v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2005] 2 SLR(R) 247SingaporeCited for the principle that a stay of execution should only be granted if there are real questions of law of public interest.
Public Prosecutor v Saiful Rizam bin Assim and other appealsCourt of AppealYes[2014] 2 SLR 495SingaporeCited for the importance of avoiding situations where an offender serves a significant portion of their sentence before an appeal is heard.
Public Prosecutor v Adith s/o SarvothamCourt of AppealYes[2014] 3 SLR 649SingaporeCited for the importance of an accused person retaining their freedom until their appeal is resolved.
Public Prosecutor v Teo Chu HaHigh CourtYes[2014] 4 SLR 600SingaporeCited for the definition of a question of law of public interest.
Bratty v Attorney-General for Northern IrelandHouse of LordsNo[1963] AC 386Northern IrelandCited as an example of a case where automatism was alleged as a defense.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
s 354A(1) of the Penal CodeSingapore
s 352 of the Penal CodeSingapore
s 383(1) of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore
s 401(2) of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore
s 397 of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore
s 397(4) of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore
s 318 of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore
s 97 of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore
s 298(11) of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore
s 356(1) of the Criminal Procedure CodeSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Stay of execution
  • Criminal reference
  • Leave application
  • Question of law of public interest
  • Outrage of modesty
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Deferment of sentence

15.2 Keywords

  • Stay of execution
  • Criminal reference
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal References
  • Stay of Execution