Arvind Daas Naaidu

Arvind Daas Naaidu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and arbitration. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Challenge against arbitrator	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duties of Legal Profession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Marine Engineering	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Validity of arbitral award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvind Daas Naaidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Arvind Daas Naaidu has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Arvind Law LLC	4 cases	44% of cases	Omae Capital Management v Tetsuya Motomura: Recovery of Pay & Termination Without Notice(Jun 2020) Prometheus Marine v. King: Challenge to Arbitrator & Setting Aside Award for Yacht Defects(Oct 2017) Prometheus Marine v King: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Yacht Defects(Feb 2017)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	3 cases	33% of cases	Thio Keng Poon v Thio Syn Pyn: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Removal from Company Directorship(Jun 2009) Thio Keng Poon v Malaysia Dairy Industries: Injunction Against Removal of Director(Dec 2008) Grays LLC v Law Society of Singapore: Professional Conduct Complaint(May 2008)
Shook Lin & Bok	1 cases	11% of cases	Ong Hien Yeow v Central Chambers LLC: Negligence in Property Purchase & Damages Assessment(Oct 2010)
Legal21 LLC	1 cases	11% of cases	Lim Kok Boon v Lee Poh King Melissa: Appeal Timeline & Further Arguments in Divorce Proceedings(Apr 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arvind Daas Naaidu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Lost	63.8 parties avg	3.8	67%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arvind Daas Naaidu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	6(67%)	67%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	285.717 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Omae Capital Management v Tetsuya Motomura: Recovery of Pay & Termination Without Notice 17 Jun 2020 Omae Capital Management Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	17 Jun 2020	Omae Capital Management Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to participate in the trial.
2	Prometheus Marine v. King: Challenge to Arbitrator & Setting Aside Award for Yacht Defects 23 Oct 2017 Prometheus Marine Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	23 Oct 2017	Prometheus Marine Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Prometheus Marine v King: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Yacht Defects 26 Feb 2017 Prometheus Marine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	26 Feb 2017	Prometheus Marine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Applications dismissedApplications to set aside the arbitral award were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Omae Capital Management v Motomura: Setting Aside Service of Writ for Fraudulent Misrepresentation 07 Apr 2015 Omae Capital Management Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Apr 2015	Omae Capital Management Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Service of Writ Set AsideService of the Writ of Summons on the Defendant was set aside due to irregularity in service. No monetary damages were specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Kok Boon v Lee Poh King Melissa: Appeal Timeline & Further Arguments in Divorce Proceedings 10 Apr 2011 Lim Kok Boon (Lin Guowen) (Appellant)Lost	10 Apr 2011	Lim Kok Boon (Lin Guowen) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $2,000 plus reasonable disbursements awarded to the Respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ong Hien Yeow v Central Chambers LLC: Negligence in Property Purchase & Damages Assessment 14 Oct 2010 Ong Hien Yeow (Plaintiff)Won	14 Oct 2010	Ong Hien Yeow (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; matter remitted for reassessment of damages.
7	Thio Keng Poon v Thio Syn Pyn: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Removal from Company Directorship 03 Jun 2009 Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jun 2009	Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiff's claims in Suit 10 of 2008 and Suit 734 of 2008 were dismissed with costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Thio Keng Poon v Malaysia Dairy Industries: Injunction Against Removal of Director 23 Dec 2008 Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Dec 2008	Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for injunction dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Grays LLC v Law Society of Singapore: Professional Conduct Complaint 11 May 2008 Law Society of Singapore (Defendant)Won	11 May 2008	Law Society of Singapore (Defendant): Application DismissedThe Law Society successfully defended against the application for a Disciplinary Committee to be appointed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).