Azri Imran Tan

Azri Imran Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and non est factum. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
House-breaking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Azri Imran Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Azri Imran Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
I.R.B Law LLP	3 cases	75% of cases	Ang Boon Han v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Grievous Hurt Sentencing(Aug 2024) Ng Kok Wai v Public Prosecutor: Extraterritorial Application of Penal Code on High Seas(Oct 2023) Yusoff Shah v Taufiq Abdul Halim: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Debt Acknowledgment(Apr 2021)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Kesavan Pillai Govindan: Rash Act Endangering Safety(Mar 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Azri Imran Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Azri Imran Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Boon Han v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Grievous Hurt Sentencing 29 Aug 2024 Ang Boon Han (Appellant)Lost	29 Aug 2024	Ang Boon Han (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the sentence of eight weeks' imprisonment was dismissed.
2	Ng Kok Wai v Public Prosecutor: Extraterritorial Application of Penal Code on High Seas 26 Oct 2023 Ng Kok Wai (Appellant)Lost	26 Oct 2023	Ng Kok Wai (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for house-breaking and theft was dismissed.
3	Yusoff Shah v Taufiq Abdul Halim: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Debt Acknowledgment 25 Apr 2021 Muhammad Yusoff Shah bin Khmamarudin (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Lost	25 Apr 2021	Muhammad Yusoff Shah bin Khmamarudin (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Application dismissedDefendant's application to set aside the default judgment was dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Kesavan Pillai Govindan: Rash Act Endangering Safety 06 Mar 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	06 Mar 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against acquittal was allowed.