Ang Boon Han v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Grievous Hurt Sentencing

In Ang Boon Han v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by Ang Boon Han against his sentence for voluntarily causing hurt under s 323A of the Penal Code, which resulted in grievous hurt to Lam Mian Sern. Ang was initially sentenced to eight weeks' imprisonment. The Chief Justice dismissed the appeal and provided detailed grounds for the decision, setting out a three-step approach to guide lower courts in sentencing offenders convicted under s 323A of the Penal Code.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Ang Boon Han appealed his sentence for voluntarily causing hurt, resulting in grievous hurt. The court dismissed the appeal and provided a sentencing framework.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Norine Tan of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Timothy Lee of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Ang Boon HanAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Sundaresh MenonChief JusticeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Norine TanAttorney-General’s Chambers
Timothy LeeAttorney-General’s Chambers
Ashwin GanapathyRamesh Tiwary
Azri Imran TanI.R.B Law LLP

4. Facts

  1. Appellant pleaded guilty to voluntarily causing hurt which caused grievous hurt to the victim.
  2. The incident occurred at a bus stop along Woodlands Avenue 2.
  3. Appellant sounded his horn on his PMD to alert pedestrians, including the victim, to make way.
  4. The victim did not move, leading to a dispute.
  5. Appellant pushed the victim on the chest, causing him to fall backwards.
  6. The victim suffered fractures of the distal radius and scaphoid at his right wrist.
  7. The victim was given 14 days of hospitalisation leave.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Ang Boon Han v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate’s Appeal No 9181 of 2023, [2024] SGHC 221

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Appellant caused hurt to victim
Victim lodged a police report and sought medical attention
Victim's last medical review
Dr Lim Wei Shyan prepared a psychiatric report
Dr Loh Seng Wei, Adrian prepared a psychiatric report
Magistrate’s Appeal No 9181 of 2023
Hearing date
Judgment Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt Which Causes Grievous Hurt
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the appeal and provided a three-step sentencing approach for offences under s 323A of the Penal Code.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Appropriateness of sentencing framework
      • Assessment of harm caused
      • Consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors
      • Asymmetry between fault and physical elements

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Voluntarily Causing Hurt Which Causes Grievous Hurt

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Public Prosecutor v Ang Boon HanDistrict CourtYes[2023] SGMC 82SingaporeCited as the judgment under appeal.
Public Prosecutor v Loi Chye HengDistrict CourtYes[2021] SGDC 90SingaporeCited for the sentencing framework applied by the District Judge, which the High Court found unsuitable.
Low Song Chye v Public Prosecutor and another appealHigh CourtYes[2019] 5 SLR 526SingaporeCited as a case where the High Court laid down a sentencing framework for the offence of voluntarily causing hurt under s 323 of the Penal Code.
Public Prosecutor v BDBCourt of AppealYes[2018] 1 SLR 127SingaporeCited as a case where the Court of Appeal laid down a sentencing approach for the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt under s 325 of the Penal Code; the sentencing framework for s 323A offences should be modelled on the two-step sentencing approach in BDB.
Tang Ling Lee v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2018] 4 SLR 813SingaporeCited as a case where the sentencing framework was meant only for road traffic offences prosecuted under s 338(b) of the Penal Code.
Saw Beng Chong v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2023] 3 SLR 424SingaporeCited for factors to consider when assessing the seriousness of an injury under s 325 of the Penal Code.
Arumugam Selvaraj v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2019] 5 SLR 881SingaporeCited as a comparable case for injuries suffered by the victim.
S Gopikrishnan v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2013] 3 SLR 1158SingaporeCited in support of the contention that where a fracture was minor, the indicative starting point could be lower than six months’ imprisonment.
Muhammad Khalis bin Ramlee v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2018] 5 SLR 449SingaporeCited for the principle that the less direct the connection between the act of the accused, the harm that he either intended or knew to be likely and the actual harm caused, the more it will be necessary to consider whether to temper the punishment to be imposed on the accused.
Public Prosecutor v Lim Yee Hua and another appealHigh CourtYes[2018] 3 SLR 1106SingaporeCited for the deterrent sentencing policy underlying road rage violence.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Section 323A Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 320 of the Penal CodeSingapore
Section 322 of the Penal CodeSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Voluntarily causing hurt
  • Grievous hurt
  • Sentencing framework
  • Asymmetry
  • Mitigating factors
  • Aggravating factors
  • Personal mobility device
  • Persistent Depressive Disorder
  • Hospitalisation leave

15.2 Keywords

  • Voluntarily causing hurt
  • Grievous hurt
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal law
  • Singapore
  • Appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Voluntary Hurt
  • Grievous Hurt