Bagchi Anamika

Bagchi Anamika is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	19% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	19% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Power	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bagchi Anamika has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bagchi Anamika has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Mohd Fauzi v PP: Appeal Against Mandatory Minimum Sentence for Drug Consumption(Dec 2015) Public Prosecutor v Devendran: Importation of Diamorphine and Wilful Blindness(Jul 2014) PP v Low Chuan Wee Anthony: Rape & Indecent Acts with a Minor - Abuse of Trust(Nov 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bagchi Anamika's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bagchi Anamika's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohd Fauzi v PP: Appeal Against Mandatory Minimum Sentence for Drug Consumption 06 Dec 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Dec 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Devendran: Importation of Diamorphine and Wilful Blindness 13 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
3	PP v Low Chuan Wee Anthony: Rape & Indecent Acts with a Minor - Abuse of Trust 30 Nov 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Nov 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of all seven charges.