PP v Low Chuan Wee Anthony: Rape & Indecent Acts with a Minor - Abuse of Trust

In Public Prosecutor v Low Chuan Wee Anthony, the High Court of Singapore convicted Low Chuan Wee Anthony, a martial arts instructor, on seven charges, including rape and indecent acts with a child. The charges stemmed from incidents involving a 13-year-old student in his martial arts club. The court, presided over by Lee Seiu Kin J, sentenced the accused to 11 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane, citing his abuse of trust and the complainant's vulnerability. The accused appealed the decision.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused convicted of all seven charges.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Low Chuan Wee Anthony was convicted of rape and indecent acts with a minor, exploiting his position as a martial arts instructor.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWonEugene Lee, Chua Ying Hong, Bagchi Anamika
Low Chuan Wee AnthonyDefendantIndividualConvictedLostMartin De Cruz

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lee Seiu KinJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Eugene LeeAttorney-General's Chambers
Chua Ying HongAttorney-General's Chambers
Bagchi AnamikaAttorney-General's Chambers
Martin De CruzShenton Law Practice LLP

4. Facts

  1. The Accused was a martial arts instructor at the Complainant's school.
  2. The Complainant was 13 years old at the time of the offences.
  3. The Accused and Complainant exchanged numerous text messages with romantic content.
  4. The Accused admitted to being in a relationship with the Complainant to a third party.
  5. The Complainant's mobile phone contained incriminating text messages from the Accused.
  6. The Accused took the Complainant to a Chinese temple and told her they were married.
  7. The Accused introduced the Complainant to others as his 'lao po' (wife).

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Low Chuan Wee Anthony, Criminal Case No 18 of 2010, [2011] SGHC 258

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused appointed instructor of the School’s martial arts club.
Complainant enrolled in the School and joined the Martial Club.
Accused and Complainant took a photograph together.
Complainant visited the Accused at his home with other trainees.
Accused committed an indecent act with the Complainant at Sembawang Beach.
Accused committed an indecent act with the Complainant at a multi-storey carpark in the vicinity of Towner Road.
Accused raped the Complainant along Turnhouse Road.
Accused raped the Complainant in the vicinity of Mandai Road.
Accused raped the Complainant along Tampines Industrial Avenue 2.
Accused committed an indecent act with the Complainant at a playground in the vicinity of Yishun estate.
Accused brought the Complainant to a Chinese temple in Yishun.
Accused committed an indecent act with the Complainant at a carpark in Yishun.
Principal received a call about the relationship between the Complainant and the Accused.
Disciplinary Mistress confiscated the Complainant’s mobile phone.
Accused's appointment as the School’s martial arts instructor was terminated.
School counsellor spoke with the Complainant.
Police report lodged.
Complainant examined at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital.
Criminal Case No 18 of 2010
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Rape
    • Outcome: Accused convicted of rape.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Consent
      • Age of victim
  2. Indecent Act with a Child
    • Outcome: Accused convicted of indecent acts with a child.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Nature of the act
      • Age of victim
  3. Reliability of Complainant's Testimony
    • Outcome: Court found the complainant's testimony to be cogent and consistent.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Inconsistencies in evidence
      • Demeanor of witness
    • Related Cases:
      • [1995] 2 SLR(R) 591
      • [2008] 1 SLR(R) 601

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Rape
  • Indecent Act with a Child

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • Education

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Khoo Kwoon Hain v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[1995] 2 SLR(R) 591SingaporeCited for the principle that it is unsafe to convict solely on the testimony of a complainant in sexual offences unless the evidence is unusually convincing.
Public Prosecutor v Mohammed Liton Mohammed Syeed MallikHigh CourtYes[2008] 1 SLR(R) 601SingaporeCited for the 'unusually convincing' test, requiring the trial judge to be aware of the dangers of convicting solely on the complainant’s testimony.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Chapter 224, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore
Children and Young Persons Act (Chapter 38, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Martial arts instructor
  • Student
  • Rape
  • Indecent act
  • Text messages
  • Relationship
  • Abuse of trust
  • Lao po
  • School
  • Minor

15.2 Keywords

  • Rape
  • Indecent act
  • Child
  • Martial arts
  • Instructor
  • Singapore
  • Criminal law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Offences
  • Child Protection

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Offences
  • Statutory Interpretation