Benjamin Koh

Benjamin Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and injunctions. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benjamin Koh has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory obligations	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Delegation of Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benjamin Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benjamin Koh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act(Jul 2020) Ngee Ann Development v Takashimaya: Lease Renewal, Prevailing Market Rental Value & Contractual Interpretation(Sep 2016) MCST Plan No 3322 v Tiong Aik: Non-Delegable Duty in Construction Defects(Jul 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benjamin Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benjamin Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,693,143.32	1,346,571.662 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act 27 Jul 2020 TYN Investment Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jul 2020	TYN Investment Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Mareva Injunction GrantedMareva injunction granted against the first defendant up to the limit of $2,693,143.32 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ngee Ann Development v Takashimaya: Lease Renewal, Prevailing Market Rental Value & Contractual Interpretation 12 Sep 2016 Ngee Ann Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	12 Sep 2016	Ngee Ann Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedNAD's claim for specific performance and other remedies was dismissed.
3	MCST Plan No 3322 v Tiong Aik: Non-Delegable Duty in Construction Defects 03 Jul 2016 THE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 3322 (Appellant)Lost	03 Jul 2016	THE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 3322 (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and costs of the appeal were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.