Benny Santoso

Benny Santoso is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benny Santoso has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conditional Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Final Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Benny Santoso has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benny Santoso has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Voltas Ltd v York International: Conditional Awards & Arbitral Jurisdiction(May 2024) Hiap Seng v Hock Heng: SOPA, Payment Response Validity & Estoppel in Construction Dispute(Feb 2024) Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benny Santoso's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benny Santoso's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	80,157.59	40,078.802 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Voltas Ltd v York International: Conditional Awards & Arbitral Jurisdiction 01 May 2024 York International Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	01 May 2024	York International Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Voltas to pay costs of $80,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Hiap Seng v Hock Heng: SOPA, Payment Response Validity & Estoppel in Construction Dispute 26 Feb 2024 Hiap Seng Building Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	26 Feb 2024	Hiap Seng Building Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Setting aside application allowed in partSetting aside application allowed in part; the adjudicated amount was reduced by SGD 157.59. The excess amount of S$157.59 was ordered to be released, from the payment into court, to the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract 03 Aug 2023 SDK Consortium (Respondent)Partial	03 Aug 2023	SDK Consortium (Respondent): PartialRestrained from claiming or directing second respondent to make payment pursuant to the claim on the bond made on 29 July 2022.
4	York International Pte Ltd v Voltas Ltd: Arbitrator's Jurisdiction & Functus Officio in Conditional Final Award 29 Jun 2022 York International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jun 2022	York International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiff's application that the Arbitrator has no jurisdiction to make any further award in respect of the Arbitration was allowed.