Bhatt Chantik Jayesh

Bhatt Chantik Jayesh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Debenture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Marine Fuel Oil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sales Confirmations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Notice of Assignment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rights of Set-Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract of Affreightment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transportation Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offset Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Authenticity of Documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bhatt Chantik Jayesh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PK Wong & Nair LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	Yong Khong Yoong Mark v Ting Choon Meng: Misrepresentation & Unlawful Means Conspiracy(May 2022) Yong Khong Yoong Mark v Ting Choon Meng: Application for Certificate of Three Counsel and Indemnity Costs(Jan 2022) Yong Khong Yoong v Ting Choon Meng: Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy in Healthstats Investment(Oct 2021)
Nair & Co LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Ozak Seiko Co Ltd v Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd: Derivative Action & Director's Duties(Jan 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bhatt Chantik Jayesh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.8 parties avg	4.8	67%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2022	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bhatt Chantik Jayesh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	32,000.00	10,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yong Khong Yoong Mark v Ting Choon Meng: Misrepresentation & Unlawful Means Conspiracy 17 May 2022 Medivice Investment Limited (Appellant)Lost	17 May 2022	Medivice Investment Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $40,000 (all-in) in favour of the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Yong Khong Yoong Mark v Ting Choon Meng: Application for Certificate of Three Counsel and Indemnity Costs 11 Jan 2022 Medivice Investment Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jan 2022	Medivice Investment Limited (Plaintiff): Summons dismissedThe plaintiffs' application was dismissed.
3	Yong Khong Yoong v Ting Choon Meng: Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy in Healthstats Investment 28 Oct 2021 Medivice Investment Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Oct 2021	Medivice Investment Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; costs to be paid to the defendants.
4	CIMB Bank v World Fuel Services: Debenture Authenticity & Right of Set-Off Dispute 04 Mar 2021 World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	04 Mar 2021	World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; WFS to receive costs of $32,000 for both appeals (CA 107/2020 and CA 130/2020) from CIMB. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off 08 Jun 2020 World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	08 Jun 2020	World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of World Fuel Services as CIMB's claims were dismissed.
6	Ozak Seiko Co Ltd v Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd: Derivative Action & Director's Duties 29 Jan 2019 Tan Hock Seng (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	29 Jan 2019	Tan Hock Seng (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedTan Hock Seng's application for leave to defend the derivative action was dismissed.