Yong Khong Yoong Mark v Ting Choon Meng: Application for Certificate of Three Counsel and Indemnity Costs

In Yong Khong Yoong Mark and others v Ting Choon Meng and another, before the General Division of the High Court on 12 January 2022, Justice Tan Siong Thye dismissed the defendants' application for a Certificate of Three Counsel, a Certificate of Two Counsel, and costs on an indemnity basis. The underlying suit involved claims of fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Summons dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Oral Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Application for Certificate of Three Counsel and indemnity costs in a case involving fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud. Application dismissed.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Yong Khong Yoong MarkPlaintiffIndividualSummons dismissedLostNair Suresh Sukumaran, Bhatt Chantik Jayesh
Emily Hwang Mei ChenPlaintiffIndividualSummons dismissedLostNair Suresh Sukumaran, Bhatt Chantik Jayesh
Medivice Investment LimitedPlaintiffCorporationSummons dismissedLostNair Suresh Sukumaran, Bhatt Chantik Jayesh
Ting Choon MengDefendantIndividualSummons dismissedWonKhan Nazim, Kuan Chu Ching, Kunal Haresh Mirpuri
Chua Ngak HweeDefendantIndividualSummons dismissedWonKhan Nazim, Kuan Chu Ching, Kunal Haresh Mirpuri

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tan Siong ThyeJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Nair Suresh SukumaranPK Wong & Nair LLC
Bhatt Chantik JayeshPK Wong & Nair LLC
Khan NazimUniLegal LLC
Kuan Chu ChingUniLegal LLC
Kunal Haresh MirpuriUniLegal LLC

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiffs were ordered to pay costs to the defendants in a prior judgment.
  2. The defendants applied for a Certificate of Three Counsel, or alternatively, a Certificate of Two Counsel.
  3. The defendants also sought costs on an indemnity basis and costs of the application.
  4. The trial took more than 19 days and involved more than 31 volumes of documents.
  5. The plaintiffs' claim was for S$5 million.
  6. The plaintiffs amended their pleadings on two occasions prior to the start of the trial.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Yong Khong Yoong Mark and others v Ting Choon Meng and another, Suit No 1140 of 2018 (Summons No 5465 of 2021), [2022] SGHC 4

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Suit filed (Suit No 1140 of 2018)
Judgment delivered ordering plaintiffs to pay costs to the defendants.
Defendants filed Summons No 5465 of 2021.
Oral judgment delivered dismissing Summons No 5465 of 2021.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Certificate of Three Counsel
    • Outcome: The court declined to grant a Certificate of Three Counsel.
    • Category: Procedural
  2. Certificate of Two Counsel
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the application for a Certificate of Two Counsel.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Costs on Indemnity Basis
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the application for costs on the indemnity basis.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Certificate of Three Counsel
  2. Certificate of Two Counsel
  3. Costs on an indemnity basis
  4. Costs of the application

9. Cause of Actions

  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • Conspiracy to Defraud

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Yong Khong Yoong Mark and others v Ting Choon Meng and anotherHigh CourtYes[2021] SGHC 246SingaporeRefers to the original judgment where costs were ordered to be paid by the plaintiffs to the defendants.
Ng Eng Ghee and others v Mamata Kapildev Dave and others (Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, intervener) and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2009] 4 SLR(R) 155SingaporeCited for the factors to be considered when determining whether the use of more than two solicitors is reasonable.
Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd v Lim Eng Hock Peter and others (Tung Yu-Lien Margaret and others, third parties)High CourtYes[2011] 1 SLR 582SingaporeCompared to the present case to demonstrate that the present case is not of such exceptional length and complexity as to warrant the use of more than two solicitors.
Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Liu Cheng Chan and othersHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 91SingaporeCompared to the present case to demonstrate that the factual and legal issues in the present case were not so complex as to justify a Certificate of Three Counsel.
Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd v PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2016] 5 SLR 103SingaporeCited for the principle that an order of costs on the indemnity basis is the exception rather than the norm and requires justification.
GTMS Construction Pte Ltd v Ser Kim Koi (Chan Sau Yan (formerly trading as Chan Sau Yan Associates) and another, third partiesHigh CourtYes[2021] SGHC 33SingaporeCompared to the present case to demonstrate that the plaintiffs' conduct did not reach a level of unreasonableness that could be considered as exceptional circumstances which warrant an order for indemnity costs.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Order 59 rule 19 of the Rules of CourtSingapore
Order 59 r 27(4) of the ROCSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Certificate of Three Counsel
  • Certificate of Two Counsel
  • Indemnity Costs
  • Taxation of Costs
  • Rules of Court
  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • Conspiracy to Defraud

15.2 Keywords

  • Certificate of Three Counsel
  • Indemnity Costs
  • Singapore High Court
  • Civil Procedure
  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • Conspiracy to Defraud

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Costs

17. Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Costs
  • Taxation