BR Rai

BR Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2000. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and performance bond. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

BR Rai has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Related Contracts	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building Sub-Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	BR Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

BR Rai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	100% of cases	New Civilbuild v Guobena: Res Judicata, Performance Bonds & Building Sub-Contracts(Feb 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of BR Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of BR Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,642,045.00	1,642,045.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	New Civilbuild v Guobena: Res Judicata, Performance Bonds & Building Sub-Contracts 28 Feb 2000 The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Feb 2000	The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd (Defendant): Judgment in FavourJudgment in favour of Tai Ping against New Civilbuild in the sum of $1,642,045 plus interest of $49,412 and costs of $3,000 together with interest at 6% per annum on the total sum of $1,694,457.10 from 16 July 1998 (date of payment of the judgment sum in Suit 57/98 to Guobena) until payment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.