Bull Cavinder SC

Bull Cavinder SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and avoidance of transactions. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bull Cavinder SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bull Cavinder SC has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt(Feb 2024) CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award(Aug 2021) Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitral Award for Alleged Fraud(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bull Cavinder SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Won	33.2 parties avg	3.2	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bull Cavinder SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	60,000.00	30,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt 27 Feb 2024 Indorama Holdings BV (Respondent)Won	27 Feb 2024	Indorama Holdings BV (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application to order Indorama Holdings BV to pay the sum of US$17,007,263.60 to the applicant was dismissed.
2	CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award 12 Aug 2021 CNA (Plaintiff)Neutral	12 Aug 2021	CNA (Plaintiff): Application not time-barredThe court found that the plaintiff's application to set aside the Partial Award was not time-barred.
3	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitral Award for Alleged Fraud 15 Feb 2021 GGAM Netherlands B.V. (Respondent)Won	15 Feb 2021	GGAM Netherlands B.V. (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellants must pay the costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Recovery Vehicle 1 v Industries Chimiques: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Forum Conveniens 28 Oct 2020 Industries Chimiques du Senegal (Respondent, Appellant)Won	28 Oct 2020	Industries Chimiques du Senegal (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedICS's appeal in CA 32 was allowed, and RV1 was ordered to pay ICS costs of $60,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).