Recovery Vehicle 1 v Industries Chimiques: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Forum Conveniens
The Singapore Court of Appeal heard appeals by Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd (RV1) and Industries Chimiques Du Senegal (ICS) regarding the service of a writ outside of Singapore. RV1, assignee of debts from Affert Resources Pte Ltd, sued ICS for breach of contract related to unpaid sulphur contracts. The court addressed whether Singapore had jurisdiction, whether the claim had merit, and whether Singapore was the appropriate forum. The Court of Appeal dismissed RV1's appeal, finding that the contracts were governed by Senegalese law, the breach did not occur in Singapore, and the claim was time-barred under Senegalese law. The court allowed ICS's appeal, concluding that Senegal was the more appropriate forum.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Court of Appeal1.2 Outcome
Appeal in Civil Appeal No 32 allowed; Appeal in Civil Appeal No 31 dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Singapore Court of Appeal addresses service out of jurisdiction and forum conveniens in a contract dispute between Recovery Vehicle 1 and Industries Chimiques.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industries Chimiques du Senegal | Respondent, Appellant | Corporation | Appeal Allowed | Won | |
Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd | Appellant, Respondent | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Sundaresh Menon | Chief Justice | No |
Steven Chong | Judge of Appeal | Yes |
Belinda Ang Saw Ean | Judge | No |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- RV1, a Singapore company, was assigned debts owed by ICS to Affert Resources Pte Ltd.
- Affert, also a Singapore company, engaged in manufacturing, trading, and chartering businesses.
- ICS is a Senegal-incorporated company involved in producing and exporting phosphate fertilizer products.
- The dispute arose from six unpaid contracts between Affert and ICS for the purchase of sulphur.
- ICS claimed Affert waived the debt as part of an acquisition of Senfer's stake in ICS by Indorama.
- RV1 argued the waiver was a sham and lacked consideration.
- ICS commenced proceedings in Senegal, obtaining a default judgment based on the waiver defense.
5. Formal Citations
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal and another appeal and another matter, , [2020] SGCA 107
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal, Civil Appeal No 31 of 2020, Civil Appeal No 31 of 2020
- Industries Chimiques Du Senegal v Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd, Civil Appeal No 32 of 2020, Civil Appeal No 32 of 2020
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal, Summons No 84 of 2020, Summons No 84 of 2020
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal, Suit No 724 of 2018, Suit No 724 of 2018
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal, Registrar’s Appeal No 179 of 2019, Registrar’s Appeal No 179 of 2019
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal, Summons No 86 of 2020, Summons No 86 of 2020
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal, , [2019] SGHC 289
- Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd, Summons No 4699 of 2018, Summons No 4699 of 2018
- Industries Chimiques Du Senegal, Summons No 383 of 2019, Summons No 383 of 2019
- The Liquidators, Originating Summons No 544 of 2019, Originating Summons No 544 of 2019
- Solvadis, Companies Winding Up No 17 of 2017, Companies Winding Up No 17 of 2017
- Transfert FZCO v Affert Resources Pte Ltd, Suit No 1072 of 2014, Suit No 1072 of 2014
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
First Sulphur Contract between Affert and ICS | |
Last Sulphur Contract between Affert and ICS | |
Email sent by Mr Syam to Mr Jindal regarding ICS dues | |
Email sent by Mr Jindal to Mr Syam acknowledging settlement of ICS dues | |
Email sent by Mr Jindal to Mr Anil Jain forwarding emails regarding ICS dues | |
Letter sent by Mr Syam to Mr Jindal confirming no claim on ICS | |
Deed of Termination signed by Affert, ICS, and Transfert | |
Affert placed in creditor’s voluntary winding-up | |
FKT sent ICS a letter demanding payment of the ICS Debt | |
ICS’s Senegalese lawyers responded to FKT denying any sum owed to Affert | |
FKT received ICS's Senegalese lawyers' letter | |
Affert compulsorily wound up by Solvadis | |
The Liquidators sent a letter of demand to ICS to recover the ICS Debt | |
The Liquidators filed a writ of summons seeking repayment of sums due under the Sulphur Contracts | |
Deed of Assignment of Receivable assigning the ICS Debt to RV1 | |
Affert assigned the ICS Debt to RV1 | |
RV1 filed an amended writ of summons | |
RV1 filed an ex parte application for leave to serve the Amended Writ on ICS in Senegal | |
ICS’s Senegalese lawyers sent a letter to RV1 enclosing documents related to the Waiver | |
Leave granted to RV1 to serve the Amended Writ out of jurisdiction | |
ICS applied to the Dakar Commercial Court for a Declaration to Extinguish Debt | |
ICS took out Summons No 383 of 2019 to set aside RV1’s Amended Writ and/or the Leave Order | |
Dakar Commercial Court gave default judgment in favor of ICS | |
Finalised default judgment released by Dakar Commercial Court | |
The Liquidators filed an application to set aside the Waiver of the ICS Debt | |
Summons served on ICS in Senegal | |
RV1 appealed against the Assistant Registrar’s decision | |
OS 544 was stayed pending the determination of these proceedings | |
Hearing date | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Service Out of Jurisdiction
- Outcome: The court found that RV1 failed to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement under O 11 r 1(e).
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Failure to comply with duty of full and frank disclosure
- Satisfaction of jurisdictional gateway
- Forum Non Conveniens
- Outcome: The court found that Senegal was the forum conveniens to try the dispute.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Availability of alternative forum
- Connection to Singapore
- Governing Law of Contract
- Outcome: The court found that the Sulphur Contracts were governed by Senegalese law.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Express choice of law
- Inferred intention of parties
- Closest and most real connection
- Limitation Period
- Outcome: The court found that RV1's claim was time-barred under Senegalese law and that the undue hardship exception did not apply.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Applicable limitation period under Senegalese law
- Exceptions to limitation period
- Undue hardship
8. Remedies Sought
- Repayment of sums due under the Sulphur Contracts
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Commodities Trading
- Fertilizer Production
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pacific Recreation Pte Ltd v S Y Technology Inc | High Court | Yes | [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491 | Singapore | Cited for the three-stage test in determining the governing law of a contract. |
Zoom Communications Ltd v Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2014] 4 SLR 500 | Singapore | Cited for the three requirements for service out of jurisdiction. |
Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd and others v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro SAPI de CV and others and another appeal (Jesus Angel Guerra Mendez, non-party) | High Court | Yes | [2020] 1 SLR 226 | Singapore | Cited for the three requirements for service out of jurisdiction. |
MAN Diesel & Turbo SE and another v IM Skaugen SE and another | High Court | Yes | [2020] 1 SLR 327 | Singapore | Cited for the three requirements for service out of jurisdiction. |
Mendelson-Zeller Co Inc v T&C Providores Pty Ltd | New South Wales Supreme Court | Yes | [1981] 1 NSWLR 366 | Australia | Cited regarding the weight to be given to various factors in determining governing law. |
Habib Bank Ltd v Central Bank of Sudan (formerly known as Bank of Sudan) | English High Court | Yes | [2007] 1 WLR 470 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the contemplated place of performance. |
Bell & Co v Antwerp, London and Brazil Line | English Court of Appeal | Yes | [1891] 1 QB 103 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the requirement for performance within jurisdiction for service out of jurisdiction. |
Cuban Atlantic Sugar Sales Corporation v Compania De Vapores San Elefterio Limitada | English Court of Appeal | Yes | [1960] 1 QB 187 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the requirement for performance within jurisdiction for service out of jurisdiction. |
Daad Sharab v HRH Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal Bin Abdal-Aziz Al-Saud | English Court of Appeal | Yes | [2009] EWCA Civ 353 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the requirement for performance within jurisdiction for service out of jurisdiction. |
Komaia Deccof and Co SA and others v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyik Dan Gas Bumi Negara | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Yes | [1982] HKCA 253 | Hong Kong | Cited regarding the place of payment in the absence of an express or implied term. |
The Eider | English High Court | Yes | [1893] Probate 119 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the general rule that the debtor must pay the creditor at the creditor’s place of business. |
BWG v BWF | High Court | Yes | [2020] 1 SLR 1296 | Singapore | Cited regarding the doctrine of approbation and reprobation. |
Lipkin International Ltd v Swiber Holdings Ltd and another | High Court | Yes | [2015] 5 SLR 962 | Singapore | Cited regarding the doctrine of approbation and reprobation. |
JWR Pte Ltd v Edmond Pereira Law Corp and another | High Court | Yes | [2020] SGCA 68 | Singapore | Cited regarding the abuse of the appeal process. |
Zyfas Medical Co (Sued as a firm) v Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc | High Court | Yes | [2020] SGCA 84 | Singapore | Cited regarding the abuse of the appeal process. |
Bryanston Finance Ltd v De Vries (No. 2) | English High Court | Yes | [1976] 1 Ch 63 | England and Wales | Cited regarding concessions made during interlocutory applications. |
Vinmar Overseas (Singapore) Pte Ltd v PTT International Trading Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2018] 2 SLR 1271 | Singapore | Cited regarding the time-bar factor for the purposes of forum non conveniens. |
Ladd v Marshall | English High Court | Yes | [1954] 1 WLR 1489 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the requirements for adducing fresh evidence on appeal. |
AnAn Group (Singapore) Pte Ltd v VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Co) | High Court | Yes | [2019] 2 SLR 341 | Singapore | Cited regarding the requirements for adducing fresh evidence on appeal. |
Sakthivel Punithavathi v Public Prosecutor | High Court | Yes | [2007] 2 SLR(R) 983 | Singapore | Cited regarding the evaluation of expert evidence. |
Liberian Shipping Corporation “Pegasus” v A King & Sons Ltd | English High Court | Yes | [1967] 2 QB 86 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the meaning of “undue hardship”. |
Bank St Petersburg OJSC and another v Arkhangelsky and another | English Court of Appeal | Yes | [2014] EWCA 593 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the meaning of “undue hardship”. |
Alseran and others v Ministry of Defence | English High Court | Yes | [2017] EWHC 3289 (QB) | England and Wales | Cited regarding the meaning of “undue hardship”. |
Harley and others v Smith and another | English Court of Appeal | Yes | [2010] EWCA Civ 78 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the meaning of “undue hardship”. |
Arab Monetary Fund v Hashim and others | English High Court | Yes | [1996] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 589 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the meaning of “undue hardship”. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R5, 2014 Rev Ed) |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2009 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Foreign Limitation Periods Act (Cap 111A, 2013 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Service out of jurisdiction
- Forum conveniens
- Governing law
- Time bar
- Waiver Defence
- Sulphur Contracts
- ICS Debt
- CFR contracts
- Undue hardship
- Abuse of process
15.2 Keywords
- Service out of jurisdiction
- Forum conveniens
- Contract law
- Singapore
- Senegal
- Time bar
- Breach of contract
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Civil Procedure | 75 |
Conflict of Laws | 65 |
Jurisdiction | 60 |
Foreign Law | 50 |
Contract Law | 40 |
Arbitration | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Civil Procedure
- Conflict of Laws