C R Rajah

C R Rajah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in strata title law and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 54.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 42% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

C R Rajah has demonstrated expertise across 81 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	21 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conclusive Evidence Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accumulators	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Standard Operating Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banker’s set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certificate of registration of charge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prison Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking Out Applications	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	C R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

C R Rajah has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	14 cases	58% of cases	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Dispute over Unauthorized Accumulator Trades(Apr 2011) Ng Eng Ghee v Mamata Kapildev Dave: Costs Allocation in Collective Sale Dispute(Jul 2009) Metalform Asia v Ser Kim Koi: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Warranties(Aug 2008)
Tan Rajah and Cheah	4 cases	17% of cases	Cheng-Wong v Oei: Easement of Way Dispute under Land Titles Act(Oct 2005) Law Society v Ong Ying Ping: Misconduct of Advocate and Solicitor in Prison Visit(Jul 2005) Wisanggeni Lauw v Full Fledge Holdings: Breach of Contract & Share Transfer Dispute(Apr 2005)
ACIES Law Corporation	1 cases	4% of cases	Yongnam Development v Somerset Development: Authority of Agent & Estoppel in Property Sale(Aug 2004)
Harpal Mahtani Partnership	1 cases	4% of cases	Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit: Limitation Act & Failure of Consideration(May 2001)
Thango & Co	1 cases	4% of cases	Tan Jin Sin v Lim Quee Choo: Dependent vs Independent Obligations in Contract Law(Mar 2009)
Wong and Leow LLC	1 cases	4% of cases	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings(Dec 2003)
Pereira & Tan	1 cases	4% of cases	Bonsel Development v Tan Kong Kar: Condition Precedent & Property Sale(Aug 2000)
Hoh Law Corporation	1 cases	4% of cases	Northern Elevator v United Engineers: Appeal Against Arbitration Award Leave(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of C R Rajah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 10 (42%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	94.1 parties avg	4.1	38%
Neutral	116.0 parties avg	16.0	4%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	4%
Won	134.6 parties avg	4.6	54%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	36.7 parties avg	6.7
2001	25.2 parties avg	5.2
2003	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	53.4 parties avg	3.4
2007	212.0 parties avg	12.0
2008	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2009	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of C R Rajah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(38%)	38%
Neutral	1(4%)	4%
Partial	1(4%)	4%
Won	13(54%)	54%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	22,000.00	1,692.3113 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2007	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Dispute over Unauthorized Accumulator Trades 10 Apr 2011 Teo Wai Cheong (Appellant)Won	10 Apr 2011	Teo Wai Cheong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Judicial Commissioner was set aside. A new trial was ordered.
2	Ng Eng Ghee v Mamata Kapildev Dave: Costs Allocation in Collective Sale Dispute 06 Jul 2009 Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent)Lost	06 Jul 2009	Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent): Costs to be paidLiable for costs of the Second Tranche of the Horizon Board proceedings, the High Court proceedings and the Appeals (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Tan Jin Sin v Lim Quee Choo: Dependent vs Independent Obligations in Contract Law 05 Mar 2009 Lim Lee Chin (Appellant)Won	05 Mar 2009	Lim Lee Chin (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs both here and below.
4	Metalform Asia v Ser Kim Koi: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Warranties 12 Aug 2008 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Aug 2008	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to strike out portions of the statement of claim was dismissed with costs.
5	Lo Pui Sang v Mamata Kapildev Dave: En Bloc Sale of Horizon Towers - Constitutional & Good Faith Challenges 16 Jul 2008 Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent)Won	16 Jul 2008	Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeals were dismissed, upholding the Strata Titles Board's decision.
6	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Strata Titles Board Powers 10 Oct 2007 Henry Lim Meng Loke (Applicant, Appellant)Won	10 Oct 2007	Henry Lim Meng Loke (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and case remitted back to the Board.
7	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Application for En Bloc Sale Intervention 30 Sep 2007 Henry Lim Meng Loke (Applicant)Neutral	30 Sep 2007	Henry Lim Meng Loke (Applicant): OtherApplication to intervene allowed.
8	Law Society of Singapore v Vardan Vasantha Lakshmi: Conflict of Interest in Property Sale 07 Nov 2006 Vardan Vasantha Lakshmi (Respondent)Lost	07 Nov 2006	Vardan Vasantha Lakshmi (Respondent): Suspension from practiceThe respondent was suspended from practice for two years and ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings.
9	Law Society v Chung Ting Fai: Advocate's Misconduct in Divorce Case 26 Sep 2006 Chung Ting Fai (Respondent)Lost	26 Sep 2006	Chung Ting Fai (Respondent): Suspended from practiceRespondent was suspended from practice for a period of one year and ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Law Society v Lim Cheong Peng: Professional Misconduct & False Attestation of Bills of Sale 20 Aug 2006 Lim Cheong Peng (Respondent)Won	20 Aug 2006	Lim Cheong Peng (Respondent): No order made on the applicationThe court made no order on the application, effectively ruling in favor of the respondent.
11	Pertamina Energy Trading v Credit Suisse: Fraudulent Drawdown & Banker's Set-Off 14 Aug 2006 Pertamina Energy Trading Limited (Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2006	Pertamina Energy Trading Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Tan Yow Kon v Tan Swat Ping: Misjoinder, Striking Out, Caveats & Land Titles Act 18 Jul 2006 Tan Yow Kon (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Jul 2006	Tan Yow Kon (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe order striking out the claim against the Remaining Defendants was reversed. The order for removal of the caveat against No 82 was affirmed, subject to the defendants providing security.
13	Cheng-Wong v Oei: Easement of Way Dispute under Land Titles Act 13 Oct 2005 Cheng-Wong Mei Ling Theresa (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Oct 2005	Cheng-Wong Mei Ling Theresa (Plaintiff): Originating Summons dismissedOriginating Summons was dismissed with costs fixed at $20,000 excluding disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Law Society v Ong Ying Ping: Misconduct of Advocate and Solicitor in Prison Visit 14 Jul 2005 Ong Ying Ping (Respondent)Lost	14 Jul 2005	Ong Ying Ping (Respondent): Suspended from PracticeThe respondent was suspended from practice for two years and ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
15	Wisanggeni Lauw v Full Fledge Holdings: Breach of Contract & Share Transfer Dispute 10 Apr 2005 Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	10 Apr 2005	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedFull Fledge's appeal in CA 95/2004 was allowed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be refunded to Full Fledge. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
16	Yongnam Development v Somerset Development: Authority of Agent & Estoppel in Property Sale 17 Aug 2004 Yongnam Development Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	17 Aug 2004	Yongnam Development Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
17	Northern Elevator v United Engineers: Appeal on Arbitration Award & Damages Assessment 25 Mar 2004 Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (Appellant)Won	25 Mar 2004	Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the granting of leave to appeal against an arbitration award was allowed.
18	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings 28 Dec 2003 Samsung Corp (Appellant)Won	28 Dec 2003	Samsung Corp (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; no application for summary judgement should be brought before the stay application has been finally disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Northern Elevator v United Engineers: Appeal Against Arbitration Award Leave 09 Oct 2003 United Engineers (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2003	United Engineers (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application allowedApplication to set aside the notice of appeal was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Gispen v Ling: Piercing the Corporate Veil & Misrepresentation in Timber Concession Sale 21 Nov 2001 UDG (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Nov 2001	UDG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; no monetary award. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit: Limitation Act & Failure of Consideration 08 May 2001 Liu Cho Chit (Respondent)Won	08 May 2001	Liu Cho Chit (Respondent): Claim dismissedThe claim against Mr. Liu was dismissed.
22	Bonsel Development v Tan Kong Kar: Condition Precedent & Property Sale 23 Aug 2000 Bonsel Development Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	23 Aug 2000	Bonsel Development Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs. Security for costs refunded to the appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Bank of China v Huang Ran-Chi: Mortgage, Possession, and Sale of Property Dispute 18 Apr 2000 Bank of China (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	18 Apr 2000	Bank of China (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeals dismissed with costs of $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Chau Kwok Fun Kevin v Etons Management: Rectification of Settlement Agreement 06 Mar 2000 German Automobiles Pte Ltd formerly known as German Motors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	06 Mar 2000	German Automobiles Pte Ltd formerly known as German Motors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for Rectification AllowedThe application of the 4th to 13th Defendants to rectify the agreement was allowed.