Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Application for En Bloc Sale Intervention

In Siow Doreen and Others v Lo Pui Sang and Others, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal against the Strata Titles Board's rejection of an application for the en bloc sale of Horizon Towers. Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, the purchaser, and a group of 13 consenting subsidiary proprietors sought leave to intervene in the appeal. The court, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck, allowed the applications for intervention, reserving the issue of costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Applications to intervene are allowed with costs reserved.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding the rejection of an en bloc sale application. The court considered applications for intervention by the purchaser and some consenting subsidiary proprietors.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Maryani SadeliRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Ng Eng GheeRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Ong Sioe HongRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Horizon Partners Pte LtdApplicantCorporationOtherNeutral
Lo Pui SangRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Quek Keng SengRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Canterford LimitedRespondentCorporationOtherNeutral
Siow DoreenApplicantIndividualOtherNeutral
Halimah Tan Bee LayApplicantIndividualOtherNeutral
Henry Lim Meng LokeApplicantIndividualOtherNeutral
Kuah Kim ChooRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Reghenzani Claude AugustusApplicantIndividualOtherNeutral
Mohammed YusufRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Hendra Gunawan/Sulistiowati KusumoRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Rudy Darmawan/Widia SeteonoRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral
Then Khek Koon/Jasmine Tan Kim LianRespondentIndividualOtherNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Consenting Subsidiary Proprietors appealed against the Strata Titles Board's rejection of their en bloc sale application.
  2. Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, the purchaser, sought leave to intervene.
  3. A group of 13 Consenting Subsidiary Proprietors also sought leave to intervene.
  4. The minority subsidiary proprietors opposed the intervention applications.
  5. The purchaser claimed a real interest in the contract's performance.
  6. The 13 members claimed their signatures were left out of the application to the Board.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Siow Doreen and Others v Lo Pui Sang and Others (Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, first intervener, and Reghenzani Claude Augustus, second intervener), OS 1269/2007, SUM 4254/2007, 4336/2007, [2007] SGHC 167

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Joinder of Parties
    • Outcome: The court allowed the applications for intervention, finding it just and convenient to hear additional perspectives.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interest in outcome of appeal
      • Effectual and complete determination of matters

8. Remedies Sought

  1. No remedies sought

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Real Estate

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed) Or 15 r 6(2)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • En bloc sale
  • Intervention
  • Strata Titles Board
  • Consenting Subsidiary Proprietors
  • Minority subsidiary proprietors

15.2 Keywords

  • En bloc sale
  • Intervention
  • Strata Titles Board
  • Civil Procedure
  • Singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Real Estate
  • Strata Titles