Cai Chengying

Cai Chengying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cai Chengying has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Third-party litigation funding	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Registration of Charges	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cai Chengying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cai Chengying has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	6 cases	86% of cases	PP v Lim Choon Beng: Rape, Aggravated Outrage of Modesty & Penile-Oral Penetration on Public Roads(Sep 2016) Tomolugen v Silica: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression & Stay of Proceedings(Oct 2015) ARS v ART: Tortious Interference, Breach of Contract, and Conspiracy in CCTV Supply Dispute(Apr 2015)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	Re Fan Kow Hin: Third-Party Litigation Funding in Bankruptcy & Assignment of Clawback Claims(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cai Chengying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	57%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	14%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cai Chengying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,109,419.76	221,883.955 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Fan Kow Hin: Third-Party Litigation Funding in Bankruptcy & Assignment of Clawback Claims 25 Nov 2018 Defendants to High Court Suit No 1078 of 2017 (Respondent)Lost	25 Nov 2018	Defendants to High Court Suit No 1078 of 2017 (Respondent): Application DeniedThe defendants opposed the funding application, but the application was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	PP v Lim Choon Beng: Rape, Aggravated Outrage of Modesty & Penile-Oral Penetration on Public Roads 21 Sep 2016 Lim Choon Beng (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2016	Lim Choon Beng (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedAccused sentenced to 16 years, 10 months and 2 weeks’ imprisonment, and 22 strokes of the cane.
3	Tomolugen v Silica: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression & Stay of Proceedings 25 Oct 2015 SILICA INVESTORS LIMITED (Respondent)Partial	25 Oct 2015	SILICA INVESTORS LIMITED (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part.
4	ARS v ART: Tortious Interference, Breach of Contract, and Conspiracy in CCTV Supply Dispute 07 Apr 2015 ART (Defendant)Won	07 Apr 2015	ART (Defendant): Claims dismissedThe claims against the defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Lease Renewal Dispute over Waterfront Redevelopment 06 Nov 2013 Jurong Town Corporation (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	06 Nov 2013	Jurong Town Corporation (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJTC's claim against UDL Marine was allowed for double rent, reinstatement costs, and rent for the reinstatement period, totaling $1,109,419.76 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Media Development Authority v Sculptor Finance: Extension of Time for Charge Registration 06 Nov 2013 Media Development Authority of Singapore (Appellant)Lost	06 Nov 2013	Media Development Authority of Singapore (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to grant an extension of time to register the charges was dismissed.
7	Sculptor Finance v Media Development Authority: Extension of Time to Register Charges under Companies Act 23 Jan 2013 Media Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	23 Jan 2013	Media Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Application opposedThe Media Development Authority of Singapore opposed the application, but the application was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).