Carolyn Bava

Carolyn Bava is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contracts. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Carolyn Bava has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Computer System Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Software Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commissioning Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Carolyn Bava has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Carolyn Bava has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Khattar Wong & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	National Skin Centre v Eutech: Breach of Contract for Computer System Commissioning(Dec 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Carolyn Bava's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Carolyn Bava's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	340,672.50	340,672.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	National Skin Centre v Eutech: Breach of Contract for Computer System Commissioning 06 Dec 2001 National Skin Centre (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 Dec 2001	National Skin Centre (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffEutech is liable to NSC for damages. NSC is to be refunded $340,672.50, but against this the cost of two business class air tickets to the USA and the sum of $109,300 paid to NSC pursuant to the call on the banker's guarantee are to be set off. Eutech is liable to NSC for the sum of $40,000 for the Y2K upgrade. NSC is entitled to any loss of profit that it is able to prove arising from Eutechs failure to commission the System by 11 May 2000 and for such period from that date as is reasonably necessary for NSC to procure an equivalent system. Eutech would be liable for any increased cost arising from the procurement of an equivalent system from another vendor. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.