Cheah Kok Lim

Cheah Kok Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 28 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 9 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and sentencing. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 32% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated expertise across 116 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	24 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 24 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lis alibi pendens	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commission Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Apartment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Industry Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares Allotment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Third Party Claims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freezing Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Piercing the corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of deed	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Advance Payment Guarantees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proper Notice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegal distress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
On-demand bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Overseas Test Centres	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Distress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting the Corporate Veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Mark Infringement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Housing Development Board (HDB)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Co-ownership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malicious Prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Premises Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheah Kok Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cheah Kok Lim has been affiliated with 9 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Partners	9 cases	32% of cases	Wu Yang v Mao Yong Hui: Mareva Injunctions, Shares Allotment & Companies Act Breach(Dec 2007) Banque Nationale de Paris v Ng Kit Har: Third-Party Notice, Res Judicata & Delay(Jun 2007) Chua Kim Leng v Phillip Securities: Commission Dispute Over Tiong Woon Corporation Share Offer(Nov 2006)
Cheah Associates LLC	5 cases	18% of cases	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Lis Alibi Pendens, Forum Non Conveniens & Overseas Training Center Dispute(Sep 2013) Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Forum Non Conveniens & Lis Alibi Pendens in Overseas Training Centre Dispute(Oct 2012) Comfort Management v Afco East: Conversion & Wrongful Distress Claim Dismissed(Jun 2012)
Ang and Partners	4 cases	14% of cases	Asta Rickmers v Hub Marine: Pre-Action Discovery for Arbitral Award Enforcement(Sep 2005) Ong Ah Tiong v Public Prosecutor: Trade Mark Infringement & Sentencing Appeal(Jan 2004) Supermix Concrete v Econ Corp: Setting Aside Garnishee Order for Material Non-Disclosure(Oct 2003)
Sng & Company	3 cases	11% of cases	Yip Kong Ban v Lin Jian Sheng Eric: Application for Reinstatement of Damages Claim(Apr 2010) Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute(Feb 2010) Chua Li Hoon Matilda v Public Prosecutor: False Trading & Falsifying Accounts under Securities Industry Act & Penal Code(May 2009)
Sng & Co	2 cases	7% of cases	Goh Teh Lee v Lim Li Pheng Maria: Collective Sale of Koon Seng House & Terrace Houses(Oct 2009) Heng Lee Suan v YTC Hotels: Negligence Claim for Slip and Fall at Paramount Hotel Entrance(Jul 2008)
Michael Khoo & Partners	2 cases	7% of cases	Chua Choon Lim Robert v MN Swami: Striking Out, Abuse of Process & Limitation Act(Jul 2000) Chau Kwok Fun Kevin v Etons Management: Rectification of Settlement Agreement(Mar 2000)
C P Lee & Co	1 cases	4% of cases	Republic Airconditioning v Shinsung Eng: Summary Judgment for Labour Charges Dispute(Mar 2012)
Leong Kwok Yan	1 cases	4% of cases	Goh Teh Lee v Lim Li Pheng Maria: Collective Sale Dispute over Koon Seng House(Apr 2010)
Sant Singh Partnership	1 cases	4% of cases	Ng Kit Har v Yii Chee Ming: Third-Party Proceedings & Validity of Third-Party Notice Service(Feb 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cheah Kok Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 9 (32%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	4%
Lost	94.8 parties avg	4.8	32%
Won	183.5 parties avg	3.5	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	310.8 parties avg	10.8
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2012	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cheah Kok Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4%)	4%
Lost	9(32%)	32%
Won	18(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	810,600.31	40,530.0220 cases	20

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 28 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Lis Alibi Pendens, Forum Non Conveniens & Overseas Training Center Dispute 24 Sep 2013 Ferdous Ahmed Badel (Respondent, Defendant)Won	24 Sep 2013	Ferdous Ahmed Badel (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Badel; the court agreed that Bangladesh was the more appropriate forum. Costs awarded to Badel.
2	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Forum Non Conveniens & Lis Alibi Pendens in Overseas Training Centre Dispute 15 Oct 2012 Ferdous Ahmed Badel (Defendant)Won	15 Oct 2012	Ferdous Ahmed Badel (Defendant): Application GrantedGazipur's application for a stay of proceedings was granted. Gazipur was awarded costs for Summons 869 and Summons 895. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Comfort Management v Afco East: Conversion & Wrongful Distress Claim Dismissed 28 Jun 2012 Lee Bee Eng (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2012	Lee Bee Eng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Republic Airconditioning v Shinsung Eng: Summary Judgment for Labour Charges Dispute 05 Mar 2012 Republic Airconditioning (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	05 Mar 2012	Republic Airconditioning (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted to the plaintiff for $323,500.31 together with interest. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Foo Ah Yan v Chiam Heng Chow: Appeal on Lump Sum Maintenance Post-Divorce 19 Feb 2012 Foo Ah Yan (Appellant)Won	19 Feb 2012	Foo Ah Yan (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; lump sum maintenance of $126,000 awarded, to be paid within three months. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	FLJ Property v Heritage Hotel: Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement Dispute 17 Jan 2012 FLJ Property Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	17 Jan 2012	FLJ Property Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; costs fixed at $6,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Goh Teh Lee v Lim Li Pheng Maria: Collective Sale Dispute over Koon Seng House 25 Apr 2010 Gobindram s/o Ramchand Chandumal (Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2010	Gobindram s/o Ramchand Chandumal (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $3,000 awarded against the Appellant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
8	Yip Kong Ban v Lin Jian Sheng Eric: Application for Reinstatement of Damages Claim 20 Apr 2010 Lin Jian Sheng Eric (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	20 Apr 2010	Lin Jian Sheng Eric (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendants' appeal was dismissed, and they were not granted leave to reinstate their claim for damages. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute 28 Feb 2010 Property Agent (Third Party)Dismissed	28 Feb 2010	Property Agent (Third Party): Claim DismissedThe Defendants’ claims against the 2nd Third Party were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Goh Teh Lee v Lim Li Pheng Maria: Collective Sale of Koon Seng House & Terrace Houses 26 Oct 2009 Gobindram s/o Ramchand Chandumal Thadhani (Respondent)Won	26 Oct 2009	Gobindram s/o Ramchand Chandumal Thadhani (Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Chua Li Hoon Matilda v Public Prosecutor: False Trading & Falsifying Accounts under Securities Industry Act & Penal Code 14 May 2009 Chua Li Hoon Matilda (Appellant, Respondent)Won	14 May 2009	Chua Li Hoon Matilda (Appellant, Respondent): Acquitted of creating a false or misleading appearance of the price of WizOffice sharesAcquitted of creating a false or misleading appearance of the price of WizOffice shares (DAC 43704/2006).
12	Heng Lee Suan v YTC Hotels: Negligence Claim for Slip and Fall at Paramount Hotel Entrance 14 Jul 2008 Heng Lee Suan (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jul 2008	Heng Lee Suan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for damages was dismissed due to the court finding that her fall was a result of her own negligence.
13	Ng Kit Har v Yii Chee Ming: Third-Party Proceedings & Validity of Third-Party Notice Service 25 Feb 2008 Yii Chee Ming (Respondent)Won	25 Feb 2008	Yii Chee Ming (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Wu Yang v Mao Yong Hui: Mareva Injunctions, Shares Allotment & Companies Act Breach 12 Dec 2007 Mao Yong Hui (Respondent)Won	12 Dec 2007	Mao Yong Hui (Respondent): Variation Order UpheldVariation order upheld, excluding Escrow Shares from the freezing order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Banque Nationale de Paris v Ng Kit Har: Third-Party Notice, Res Judicata & Delay 27 Jun 2007 Yii Chee Ming (Other)Won	27 Jun 2007	Yii Chee Ming (Other): Successful Resistance of Third Party ClaimSuccessfully resisted the third party claim due to the defendants' lack of diligence and the principles of res judicata.
16	Chua Kim Leng v Phillip Securities: Commission Dispute Over Tiong Woon Corporation Share Offer 27 Nov 2006 Chua Kim Leng (Cai Jinling) (Plaintiff)Won	27 Nov 2006	Chua Kim Leng (Cai Jinling) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $327,600 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Asta Rickmers v Hub Marine: Pre-Action Discovery for Arbitral Award Enforcement 27 Sep 2005 Hub Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Sep 2005	Hub Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was dismissed, and the defendant was ordered to pay costs of $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Ong Ah Tiong v Public Prosecutor: Trade Mark Infringement & Sentencing Appeal 26 Jan 2004 Ong Ah Tiong (Appellant)Lost	26 Jan 2004	Ong Ah Tiong (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the sentence of 32 months' imprisonment was dismissed.
19	Supermix Concrete v Econ Corp: Setting Aside Garnishee Order for Material Non-Disclosure 30 Oct 2003 Supermix Concrete Pte Ltd (Appellant, Judgment Debtor)Won	30 Oct 2003	Supermix Concrete Pte Ltd (Appellant, Judgment Debtor): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; Garnishee Order Absolute set aside. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Public Prosecutor v Tan Chui Yun Joselyn: Rebutting Drug Consumption Presumption under Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Feb 2003 Tan Chui Yun Joselyn (Respondent)Won	06 Feb 2003	Tan Chui Yun Joselyn (Respondent): Acquittal upheldThe respondent's acquittal on the charge of unauthorised drug consumption was upheld.
21	Econ Corp v Ballast-Nedam: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Performance Bond Dispute 09 Dec 2002 Econ Corporation International Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	09 Dec 2002	Econ Corporation International Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the plaintiffs were granted leave to serve the Originating Summons out of jurisdiction and the defendants were ordered to pay costs of $7,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Lim Hun Ching v Lim Ah Choon: Sale of Land & Misdescription of Gross Floor Area 27 Aug 2002 Lim Hun Ching (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Aug 2002	Lim Hun Ching (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiffs’ application dismissed with costs fixed at $9,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Public Prosecutor v Jamal anak Nyalau: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 18 Apr 2002 Jeffery Anak Randi (Defendant)Lost	18 Apr 2002	Jeffery Anak Randi (Defendant): ConvictedSentenced to six years and six months imprisonment; sentence backdated to the date of arrest ie 7 July 2001.
24	Liang Huat Aluminium v Hi-Tek Construction: Performance Bond Call Dispute 07 Nov 2001 Liang Huat Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	07 Nov 2001	Liang Huat Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for a declaration and injunction was dismissed.
25	Management Corporation v Liang Huat: Construction Contract, Indemnity vs. Warranty 24 May 2001 Liang Huat Aluminium Ltd (Respondent)Lost	24 May 2001	Liang Huat Aluminium Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Interlocutory judgment entered in favour of the Management Corporation with damages to be assessed and interest awarded at 6% per annum from the date of the writ to the date of final judgment. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Management Corporation v Comtech: Deed of Indemnity & Construction Defects 10 Oct 2000 Liang Huat Aluminium Limited (Defendant)Won	10 Oct 2000	Liang Huat Aluminium Limited (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the second defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Chua Choon Lim Robert v MN Swami: Striking Out, Abuse of Process & Limitation Act 18 Jul 2000 Sam & Wijaya (Defendant, Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2000	Sam & Wijaya (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's action against the third defendant was dismissed as disclosing no reasonable cause of action, being vexatious and an abuse of the process of court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Chau Kwok Fun Kevin v Etons Management: Rectification of Settlement Agreement 06 Mar 2000 Jay Henry Leung (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Mar 2000	Jay Henry Leung (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiffs' claim was dismissed with costs.