Chee Yi Wen Serene

Chee Yi Wen Serene is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in setting aside and issue estoppel. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and minority oppression.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Subscription	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Time limit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chee Yi Wen Serene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chee Yi Wen Serene has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	9 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation(Jan 2025) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs(Aug 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chee Yi Wen Serene's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Partial	53.0 parties avg	3.0	56%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chee Yi Wen Serene's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(30%)	30%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	5(50%)	50%
Won	1(10%)	10%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,715,993.81	285,998.976 cases	6
USD	603,800,000.00	603,800,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation 30 Jan 2025 Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	30 Jan 2025	Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with Senda liable to reimburse Kiri’s costs fixed at S$90,000.00, and Kiri’s disbursements of S$4,837.40. Discretionary enhancement of the sum to be paid to Kiri following the en bloc sale, calculated at 5.33% per annum on US$603.8m running from 3 September 2023 until the date of payment. That sum, as with the Valuation figure, will be paid to Kiri in priority as against Senda out of the net proceeds of the en bloc sale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs 28 Aug 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Aug 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial success in costs applicationSenda to pay costs in the sum of S$360,050.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale 19 May 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 May 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Entitled to US$603.8m in priority from en bloc sale proceedsKiri Industries will receive US$603.8 million from the proceeds of the en bloc sale of shares in DyStar, in priority to Senda International Capital Ltd.
4	Kiri Industries v DyStar: Breach of Contract, Res Judicata & Certainty of Terms 13 Apr 2023 Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	13 Apr 2023	Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedKiri's appeal (CA 57) was dismissed. The court ordered both Kiri and DyStar to bear their own costs for both CA 57 and CA 58. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd: Minority Oppression & Costs Assessment in SICC 24 Nov 2022 Kiri Industries Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	24 Nov 2022	Kiri Industries Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldKiri was awarded S$123,250 as its “reasonable costs” of this appeal under O 110 r 46(2) of the ROC 2014. Kiri was also allowed to recover disbursements of S$7,928.61 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Appeal 05 Jul 2022 Kiri Industries Ltd (Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	05 Jul 2022	Kiri Industries Ltd (Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding DLOM and notional license fee. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	The King's Challenge Pte Ltd v Baer-Richner: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Breach of Contract 28 Oct 2021 McGoun IV, Samuel Harvey (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Oct 2021	McGoun IV, Samuel Harvey (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the court will hear costs at a later date if parties are unable to agree costs.
8	DyStar v Kiri: Breach of Contract & Res Judicata in Shareholder Agreement 23 Sep 2021 Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Defendant)Neutral	23 Sep 2021	Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Defendant): Not involved in CounterclaimThe second defendant, Mr. Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri, was not involved in the Counterclaim.
9	BRS v BRQ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice & Time Limit Extension 28 Oct 2020 BRR (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	28 Oct 2020	BRR (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartThe issue of whether the transmission line delays would have postponed the Cut-off Date was remitted to the Tribunal for its decision.