Chelva Rajah

Chelva Rajah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 9 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 39% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chelva Rajah has demonstrated expertise across 109 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Procedures	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Co-ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Exclusion of appellate jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Global Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Special Purpose Vehicle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commingling of bank accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale and Leaseback	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Put and Call Option Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bona vacantia	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chelva Rajah has been affiliated with 9 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	13 cases	57% of cases	JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Winding Up Application for Inability to Pay Debts(Jul 2024) Law Society of Singapore v. Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin: Disciplinary Review for Mental Capacity & Overcharging(Jan 2020) Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations(May 2013)
Tan Rajah and Cheah	3 cases	13% of cases	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Conspiracy, Fraud & Mareva Injunction(May 2004) Chew Kim Kee v Kertar and Co: Negligence Claim for Failure to Advise on Appeal Deadline in Matrimonial Asset Division(May 2004) Law Society v Ezekiel Caleb Charles James: Criminal Breach of Trust & Fitness for Legal Profession(Feb 2004)
Hin Tat Augustine & Partners	1 cases	4% of cases	Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong: Dispute over Equity Accumulator Transactions(May 2012)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Lim Siew Bee v Lim Boh Chuan: Estate Dispute over Inheritance and Breach of Trust(Mar 2014)
Heng Leong & Srinivasan	1 cases	4% of cases	Singapore Tourism Board v Children's Media Ltd: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Corporate Veil Piercing(May 2008)
M/s Ram Goswami	1 cases	4% of cases	Lim Seng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & CDSA Offences in Private Banking(Dec 2014)
Wong & Leow LLC	1 cases	4% of cases	MacarthurCook v Khai Wah: Put & Call Option Termination Dispute(Jun 2007)
Leong Kwok Yan	1 cases	4% of cases	Goh Teh Lee v Lim Li Pheng Maria: Collective Sale Dispute over Koon Seng House(Apr 2010)
Genesis Law Corporation	1 cases	4% of cases	Wong Kian Kok v Landmark Chemicals: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement Dispute(Sep 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chelva Rajah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.6
Complex Cases: 9 (39%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	143.7 parties avg	3.7	61%
Neutral	120.0 parties avg	20.0	4%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	9%
Won	53.1 parties avg	3.1	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2004	317.6 parties avg	17.6
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	45.1 parties avg	5.1
2010	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chelva Rajah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(61%)	61%
Neutral	1(4%)	4%
Other	1(4%)	4%
Partial	2(9%)	9%
Won	5(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,468,519.83	497,578.4513 cases	13
USD	1,450,000.00	1,450,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Other: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2004	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Winding Up Application for Inability to Pay Debts 25 Jul 2024 Group Lease Public Company Limited (Non-party)Lost	25 Jul 2024	Group Lease Public Company Limited (Non-party): Application dismissedGL Thailand's submission in opposition to JTA’s winding up application was rejected. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Law Society of Singapore v. Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin: Disciplinary Review for Mental Capacity & Overcharging 07 Jan 2020 Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin (Respondent)Lost	07 Jan 2020	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin (Respondent): Determination Set AsideDetermination set aside; new Disciplinary Tribunal to be appointed.
3	Lim Seng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & CDSA Offences in Private Banking 22 Dec 2014 Lim Seng Soon (Appellant)Partial	22 Dec 2014	Lim Seng Soon (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partTotal sentence reduced from six years to 4½ years' imprisonment.
4	Lim Siew Bee v Lim Boh Chuan: Estate Dispute over Inheritance and Breach of Trust 04 Mar 2014 Lim Siew Bee (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Mar 2014	Lim Siew Bee (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims against the defendants are dismissed in their entirety. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations 16 May 2013 Teo Wai Cheong (Appellant)Won	16 May 2013	Teo Wai Cheong (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Teo’s counterclaim against the Bank for wrongful liquidation of his assets and for wrongful set off of any cash balances in his account is allowed. The Bank is to pay such sum found to be due to Teo with interest from the date of such wrongful liquidation and/or set off to the date of payment at the rate of 3% per annum. If the account and the extent of any repayment due to Teo cannot be agreed between the parties, the matter is to be remitted to the Retrial Judge for determination. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong: Dispute over Equity Accumulator Transactions 02 May 2012 Teo Wai Cheong (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2012	Teo Wai Cheong (Defendant): Claim DismissedTeo's counterclaim was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay CIC $2,782,803.66 for the shares delivered, $3,625,393.11 for closing out costs, and interest of $51,323.06 as of 29 August 2008 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Menjit Singh v Ong Lay Peng: Whiplash Injury, Damages Assessment, Loss of Earnings 16 Jan 2012 Menjit Singh s/o Hari Singh (Respondent)Lost	16 Jan 2012	Menjit Singh s/o Hari Singh (Respondent): Loss of pre-trial and future earnings award set asideThe court found that Mr. Singh had exaggerated his symptoms and could have continued working as a teacher. Therefore, the award for loss of pre-trial and future earnings was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Tang Wai Kum Beatrice v Tang Chun Choy: Resulting Trust & Property Ownership Dispute 19 May 2011 Tang Chun Choy (Defendant)Won	19 May 2011	Tang Chun Choy (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant; each party bears his own costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Holland Leedon v Metalform Asia: Application for Leave to Appeal Arbitration Decision 13 Feb 2011 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	13 Feb 2011	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Leave to appeal deniedThe Defendant's application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision made on 17 September 2010 in Originating Summons No 1679 of 2007 was denied.
10	Holland Leedon v Metalform Asia: Appeal for Leave on Arbitrator's Decision Regarding SPA Interpretation 16 Sep 2010 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Purchaser)Lost	16 Sep 2010	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Purchaser): Leave to appeal granted to other partyThe court granted the applicant leave to appeal the arbitrator's decision. No monetary amount was specified.
11	Goh Teh Lee v Lim Li Pheng Maria: Collective Sale Dispute over Koon Seng House 25 Apr 2010 Gobindram s/o Ramchand Chandumal (Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2010	Gobindram s/o Ramchand Chandumal (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $3,000 awarded against the Appellant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
12	Trane US v Stott: Anti-Suit Injunction & Forum Non Conveniens in Distribution Agreement Dispute 25 Dec 2008 PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Defendant)Lost	25 Dec 2008	PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Defendant): Application for anti-suit injunction granted against defendantApplication for anti-suit injunction granted against the defendant, restraining it from commencing or continuing with court proceedings in Indonesia. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Wong Kian Kok v Landmark Chemicals: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement Dispute 01 Sep 2008 Landmark Chemicals (Far East) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	01 Sep 2008	Landmark Chemicals (Far East) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; payment into court ordered. The plaintiffs sought to recover US$1.45 million under the agreement.
14	Re Estate of Lim Yew Teok: Determining Devolution of Shares After Failure of Stirps 05 Aug 2008 Koh Tek Heng (Respondent)Lost	05 Aug 2008	Koh Tek Heng (Respondent): Claim dismissedThe court declared that all 40 shares of the income of the residuary trust funds should fall into residue, thus dismissing the claim.
15	Singapore Tourism Board v Children's Media Ltd: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Corporate Veil Piercing 26 May 2008 Anthony David Hollingsworth (Defendant)Lost	26 May 2008	Anthony David Hollingsworth (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the defendant; damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
16	MacarthurCook v Khai Wah: Put & Call Option Termination Dispute 14 Jun 2007 Macarthurcook Limited (Applicant)Lost	14 Jun 2007	Macarthurcook Limited (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Conspiracy, Fraud & Mareva Injunction 31 May 2004 Natura Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	31 May 2004	Natura Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to strike out claim dismissedApplication to strike out claim dismissed.
18	Chew Kim Kee v Kertar and Co: Negligence Claim for Failure to Advise on Appeal Deadline in Matrimonial Asset Division 07 May 2004 Kertar and Co (Defendant)Won	07 May 2004	Kertar and Co (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Law Society v Ezekiel Caleb Charles James: Criminal Breach of Trust & Fitness for Legal Profession 22 Feb 2004 Ezekiel Caleb Charles James (Respondent)Lost	22 Feb 2004	Ezekiel Caleb Charles James (Respondent): Struck off the rollThe respondent was ordered to be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors.
20	Aberdeen Asset Management v Fraser & Neave: Oppression of Minority Shareholders 10 Oct 2001 Fraser & Neave Limited (Applicant, Respondent)Other	10 Oct 2001	Fraser & Neave Limited (Applicant, Respondent): -
21	Aberdeen Asset Management v Fraser & Neave: Appeal Timing & Interlocutory Orders in Defamation Case 10 Oct 2001 Fraser & Neave Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	10 Oct 2001	Fraser & Neave Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Motion OpposedF&N and others opposed the motion of Aberdeen & Young, but the motion was allowed. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Will of Samuel Emily: Interpretation of Charitable Gifts & Intestacy 08 Oct 2001 Beneficiaries 1 to 5, 7 to 9 and 12 to 14 in the will (Respondent)Partial	08 Oct 2001	Beneficiaries 1 to 5, 7 to 9 and 12 to 14 in the will (Respondent): Gifts clarifiedBeneficiaries identified as stated in para 7 of Han Kee Fong`s affidavit of 7 September 2001.
23	Subbiah Pillai v Wong Meng Meng: Natural Justice in Legal Profession Disciplinary Inquiry 19 Jul 2001 Wong Meng Meng (Respondent)Won	19 Jul 2001	Wong Meng Meng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.