Wong Kian Kok v Landmark Chemicals: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement Dispute
Wong Kian Kok and Another, liquidators of Asichem Trading (S) Pte Ltd, sued Landmark Chemicals (Far East) Pte Ltd to enforce a settlement agreement. The High Court of Singapore, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck, heard the appeal on September 2, 2008. The plaintiffs sought to recover US$1.45 million under the agreement after the first defendant failed to pay. The court found that an actionable agreement had been reached and dismissed the appeal, ordering the first defendant to make full payment into court.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed; payment into court ordered.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Liquidators of Asichem Trading sued Landmark Chemicals to enforce a settlement agreement. The court found an actionable agreement existed, ordering payment into court.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wong Kian Kok and Another (liquidators of Asichem Trading (S) Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) | Plaintiff, Respondent | Corporation | Appeal dismissed | Won | Cavinder Bull, Harleen Kaur |
Landmark Chemicals (Far East) Pte Ltd | Defendant, Appellant | Corporation | Appeal dismissed | Lost | Chelva Rajah, Kesavan Nair |
Landmark Chemicals S.A. | Defendant | Corporation | Neutral | Neutral |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Cavinder Bull | Drew & Napier LLC |
Harleen Kaur | Drew & Napier LLC |
Chelva Rajah | Genesis Law Corporation |
Kesavan Nair | Genesis Law Corporation |
4. Facts
- The plaintiffs, liquidators of Asichem Trading, sued the first defendant and obtained interlocutory judgment.
- The second defendant commenced arbitration proceedings against the plaintiff.
- On April 19, 2006, the parties negotiated a global settlement including the arbitration proceedings.
- The first defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff US$1,450,000 in full settlement within seven days.
- The second defendant would withdraw its claim and discontinue arbitration proceedings.
- A draft written agreement was prepared but not signed.
- The first defendant failed to pay the settlement amount.
5. Formal Citations
- Wong Kian Kok and Another (liquidators of Asichem Trading (S) Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) v Landmark Chemicals (Far East) Pte Ltd and Another, Suit 239/2008, RA 286/2008, [2008] SGHC 145
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Plaintiffs sued the first defendant in Suit 664 of 2003. | |
Agreement reached on settlement terms. | |
Arbitration originally scheduled to take place. | |
Assessment of damages adjourned. | |
Assessment of damages adjourned. | |
Appeal heard and dismissed. |
7. Legal Issues
- Enforceability of Settlement Agreement
- Outcome: The court found that an actionable agreement had been reached.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Chemicals
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Settlement Agreement
- Liquidators
- Arbitration
- Assessment of Damages
- Global Settlement
- Full and Final Settlement
- Actionable Agreement
15.2 Keywords
- settlement agreement
- contract law
- arbitration
- liquidators
- landmark chemicals
- asichem trading
16. Subjects
- Contract Dispute
- Settlement Agreement
- Arbitration
17. Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Arbitration Law