Chen Jie’An Jared

Chen Jie’An Jared is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in offer to settle and summary judgement. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 78% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trustees Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Recoupment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chen Jie’An Jared has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chen Jie’An Jared has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	8 cases	89% of cases	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Representation of Interested Persons in Trust Dispute(Sep 2022) Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech: Striking Out in Minority Oppression Claim(Sep 2022) Vaz Lorrain v. Singapore Rifle Assn: Breach of Mediation Agreement & Offer to Settle(Nov 2020)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	11% of cases	Foo Peow Yong Douglas v ERC Prime II Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed(Nov 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chen Jie’An Jared's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 7 (78%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	55.3 parties avg	5.3	56%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	11%
Partial	45.0 parties avg	5.0	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	46.5 parties avg	6.5
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	27.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chen Jie’An Jared's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	4(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,000.00	3,250.004 cases	4
USD	31,173,698.53	31,173,698.531 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Representation of Interested Persons in Trust Dispute 29 Sep 2022 Lutfi Salim bin Talib (Respondent)Neutral	29 Sep 2022	Lutfi Salim bin Talib (Respondent): NeutralThe judgment pertains to an interlocutory application and does not directly result in a 'Won' or 'Lost' outcome for this party. The outcome is therefore considered neutral.
2	Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech: Striking Out in Minority Oppression Claim 20 Sep 2022 Cyberdyne Tech Exchange Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	20 Sep 2022	Cyberdyne Tech Exchange Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for striking out granted in partApplication for striking out granted in part; paragraphs 55 and 56 of the Statement of Claim were struck out.
3	Vaz Lorrain v. Singapore Rifle Assn: Breach of Mediation Agreement & Offer to Settle 19 Nov 2020 Singapore Rifle Association (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	19 Nov 2020	Singapore Rifle Association (Respondent, Plaintiff): Nominal Damages AwardedNominal damages of $1,000 awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Michael Vaz Lorrain v Singapore Rifle Association: Offer to Settle & Discontinuance After Judgment 19 Jul 2020 Singapore Rifle Association (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jul 2020	Singapore Rifle Association (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal deniedThe court held that SRA's acceptance of the OTS on 5 May 2020 was not valid.
5	MCH International v YG Group: Contractual Interpretation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Damages 14 Nov 2019 Sing Lee Mee Yoke (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	14 Nov 2019	Sing Lee Mee Yoke (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe court dismissed MCH’s, Mr H Wong’s and Mrs Wong’s appeal in CA 65 with regard to the conspiracy claims and counterclaims. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Anita Hatta v Lee Siow Kiang Georgia: Misrepresentation & Minority Oppression in DrGL Share Investment 23 Sep 2019 Anita Hatta (Plaintiff)Partial	23 Sep 2019	Anita Hatta (Plaintiff): Shares to be purchased at 3% of the valuation of ADBThe court ordered the first defendant to purchase the plaintiff’s shares at 3% of the valuation of ADB, with the value to be determined on an income basis by an independent valuer, as at the date of the court order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment on Guarantee & Striking Out Counterclaim 28 Apr 2019 Chen Weiping (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	28 Apr 2019	Chen Weiping (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of US$31,173,698.53. Counterclaim against the Defendant struck out.
8	CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment & Striking Out in Guarantee Claim 28 Apr 2019 Chen Weiping (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	28 Apr 2019	Chen Weiping (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Summary Judgment GrantedSummary judgment was granted against Chen Weiping.
9	Foo Peow Yong Douglas v ERC Prime II Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed 15 Nov 2017 Douglas Foo Peow Yong (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2017	Douglas Foo Peow Yong (Plaintiff, Appellant): Application dismissedApplication to wind up the defendant company was dismissed; costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the defendant and costs of $2,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the two non-parties (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).