Foo Peow Yong Douglas v ERC Prime II Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed
Mr. Douglas Foo Peow Yong applied to the High Court of Singapore to wind up ERC Prime II Pte Ltd, arguing that the company's directors acted in their own interests and that it was just and equitable to do so. Chua Lee Ming J dismissed the application on 19 September 2017, finding no pressing reason to wind up the company before a dispute over an escrow sum was resolved. Douglas Foo has appealed against this decision.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Application dismissed
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Application to wind up ERC Prime II dismissed. The court found no pressing reason to wind up the company before the dispute over an escrow sum was resolved.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Douglas Foo Peow Yong | Plaintiff, Appellant | Individual | Application dismissed | Lost | |
ERC Prime II Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Application dismissed | Won | |
Ainon binte Ismail | Other | Individual | Costs awarded | Neutral | |
Tan Tek Seng Kelvin | Other | Individual | Costs awarded | Neutral |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Chua Lee Ming | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Douglas Foo applied to wind up ERC Prime II Pte Ltd.
- The company was set up as a special purpose vehicle for the Big Hotel Project.
- The Big Hotel property was sold in 2015.
- A dispute exists over the distribution of an Escrow Sum related to the sale.
- Douglas Foo cited concerns about the directors' management of the company's affairs.
- The company has no objections to being wound up after the dispute over the Escrow Sum is resolved.
5. Formal Citations
- Foo Peow Yong Douglas v ERC Prime II Pte Ltd, Companies Winding Up No 143 of 2017, [2017] SGHC 299
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Company incorporated for purposes of the Big Hotel Project | |
Shareholders’ Agreement dated | |
Sale of Big Hotel property completed | |
Application dismissed | |
Judgment Date |
7. Legal Issues
- Winding up of a company
- Outcome: The court dismissed the application to wind up the company.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Loss of substratum
- Loss of confidence in directors
- Related Cases:
- [1992] 1 SLR(R) 870
- [1993] 2 SLR(R) 685
- [2008] 4 SLR(R) 348
8. Remedies Sought
- Winding up order
9. Cause of Actions
- Winding up
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Insolvency Law
11. Industries
- Real Estate
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chua Kien How v Goodwealth Trading Pte Ltd and another | High Court | Yes | [1992] 1 SLR(R) 870 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that a company’s substratum is lost if its main objects can no longer be achieved. |
Chong Choon Chai and another v Tan Gee Cheng and another | High Court | Yes | [1993] 2 SLR(R) 685 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that loss of confidence in directors can justify winding up on just and equitable grounds. |
Sakae Holdings Ltd v Gryphon Real Estate Investment Corporation Pte Ltd and others | High Court | Yes | [2017] SGHC 73 | Singapore | Cited as another legal proceeding related to the Big Hotel Project and Bugis Cube Project. |
Lai Shit Har and another v Lau Yu Man | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2008] 4 SLR(R) 348 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court retains discretion to consider all relevant factors before deciding whether to wind up a company. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Winding up
- Special purpose vehicle
- Escrow Sum
- Substratum
- Loss of confidence
- Shareholders’ Agreement
15.2 Keywords
- Winding up
- Company
- ERC Prime II
- Douglas Foo
- Singapore
- High Court
- Escrow Sum
- Shareholders
- Directors
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Winding Up | 95 |
Company Law | 70 |
Minority Oppression | 60 |
Commercial Disputes | 30 |
Shareholders Agreement | 25 |
16. Subjects
- Company Law
- Insolvency