Chenthil Kumarasingam

Chenthil Kumarasingam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and enforcement of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated expertise across 76 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lasting Power of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
State Immunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Piercing corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonoured Cheques	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conclusive Evidence Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unauthorised Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pledge of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Pledgee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chenthil Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chenthil Kumarasingam has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	3 cases	25% of cases	Prabagaran v PP: Importation of Diamorphine & Rebuttal of Statutory Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2015) Straits Advisors v Michael Deeb: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, Conspiracy, Negligence Claims in Aborted IPO(May 2014) Ministry of Rural Development v Chan Leng Leng: Enforcing Foreign Judgments and Penal Laws(Feb 2014)
Lawrence Quahe & Woo LLC	3 cases	25% of cases	Ministry of Rural Development v Chan Leng Leng: Security for Costs Application(Sep 2012) Thomson Rubbers v Tan Ai Hock: Summary Judgment for Dishonoured Cheques(Nov 2011) Jiang Ou v EFG Bank AG: Employee Fraud, Unauthorized Trading, and Conclusive Evidence Clauses(Jun 2011)
Withers KhattarWong LLP	2 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Tan Yew Sin: Sexual Assault, Rape, Outrage of Modesty, Mistake of Fact(May 2023) Sunpower Semiconductor v. Powercom Yuraku: Extension of Time for Submissions in Shareholders' Dispute Appeal(Apr 2023)
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	17% of cases	Lemon Grass v Peranakan Place: Dispute over Right of Access in Tenancy Agreement(May 2002) Rajasekaran v PP: Rioting Conviction Appeal - Unlawful Assembly & Identification Evidence(Sep 2001)
Oon & Bazul LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Law Society v Sum Chong Mun: Professional Misconduct in Lasting Power of Attorney Certification(Apr 2017)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	8% of cases	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim(Sep 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chenthil Kumarasingam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.8 parties avg	2.8	67%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	32.5 parties avg	2.5	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chenthil Kumarasingam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(67%)	67%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	3(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,334,763.00	266,952.605 cases	5
USD	2,338,278.68	2,338,278.681 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Tan Yew Sin: Sexual Assault, Rape, Outrage of Modesty, Mistake of Fact 11 May 2023 Tan Yew Sin (Defense)Won	11 May 2023	Tan Yew Sin (Defense): AcquittedThe defendant was acquitted of all charges.
2	Sunpower Semiconductor v. Powercom Yuraku: Extension of Time for Submissions in Shareholders' Dispute Appeal 25 Apr 2023 Sunpower Semiconductor Limited (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2023	Sunpower Semiconductor Limited (Appellant): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file written submissions was dismissed; Sunpower is to pay Powercom Yuraku Pte Ltd costs of the present application fixed at $8,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Law Society v Sum Chong Mun: Professional Misconduct in Lasting Power of Attorney Certification 10 Apr 2017 KAY SWEE TUAN (Respondent)Lost	10 Apr 2017	KAY SWEE TUAN (Respondent): Disciplinary ActionFound guilty of professional misconduct and suspended for 30 months, with costs awarded to the Law Society (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Prabagaran v PP: Importation of Diamorphine & Rebuttal of Statutory Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Nov 2015 PRABAGARAN A/L SRIVIJAYAN (Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2015	PRABAGARAN A/L SRIVIJAYAN (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
5	Straits Advisors v Michael Deeb: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, Conspiracy, Negligence Claims in Aborted IPO 05 May 2014 Straits Advisors Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	05 May 2014	Straits Advisors Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedAll claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, conspiracy, negligence, and breach of contract were dismissed.
6	Ministry of Rural Development v Chan Leng Leng: Enforcing Foreign Judgments and Penal Laws 24 Feb 2014 Chan Leng Leng (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	24 Feb 2014	Chan Leng Leng (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against the assistant registrar’s refusal to strike out the plaintiff’s claim was dismissed.
7	Ministry of Rural Development v Chan Leng Leng: Security for Costs Application 26 Sep 2012 Second defendant (Defendant)Won	26 Sep 2012	Second defendant (Defendant): Security for costs grantedDefendant's application for security for costs was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Thomson Rubbers v Tan Ai Hock: Summary Judgment for Dishonoured Cheques 28 Nov 2011 Tan Ai Hock (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2011	Tan Ai Hock (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and final judgment entered against the defendant on the two cheques in the sums of S$709,065 and S$616,698 with interest and costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Jiang Ou v EFG Bank AG: Employee Fraud, Unauthorized Trading, and Conclusive Evidence Clauses 08 Jun 2011 Jiang Ou (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jun 2011	Jiang Ou (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in the sum of US$2,338,278.68 to be paid by EFG Bank to Mdm Jiang; interest at the rate of 5.33 per cent on the judgment sum of US$2,338,278.68 from 15 December 2009 till the date of judgment; and costs on a standard basis to be paid by EFG Bank to Mdm Jiang to be taxed if not agreed and such costs shall include the cost of the expert witness.
10	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim 20 Sep 2007 Beckkett Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Sep 2007	Beckkett Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Nominal Damages AwardedNominal damages of $1000 awarded due to failure to prove undervalue. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Lemon Grass v Peranakan Place: Dispute over Right of Access in Tenancy Agreement 23 May 2002 Peranakan Place Complex Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 May 2002	Peranakan Place Complex Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe Defendants' Counterclaim was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiffs.
12	Rajasekaran v PP: Rioting Conviction Appeal - Unlawful Assembly & Identification Evidence 20 Sep 2001 Rajasekaran s/o Armuthelingam (Appellant)Lost	20 Sep 2001	Rajasekaran s/o Armuthelingam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.