Chin Wei Lin

Chin Wei Lin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Takeover Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Management Consultancy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chin Wei Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chin Wei Lin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp v Asia Pacific Links: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Takeover Code(Oct 2010) Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi(Jan 2010) Eng Gee Seng v Quek Choon Teck: Minority Oppression in Quasi-Partnership Duck Abattoir(Sep 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chin Wei Lin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chin Wei Lin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp v Asia Pacific Links: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Takeover Code 11 Oct 2010 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Oct 2010	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff; damages to be assessed at a later stage. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi 28 Jan 2010 Standard Chartered Bank (Appellant)Won	28 Jan 2010	Standard Chartered Bank (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court found in favor of the appellant. Costs to be borne by each party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Eng Gee Seng v Quek Choon Teck: Minority Oppression in Quasi-Partnership Duck Abattoir 17 Sep 2009 DA Foods Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	17 Sep 2009	DA Foods Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders Made Against CompanyOrders were made against the company regarding discovery of documents and costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Michael de Kretser Consultants v De Kretser: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Employment Contract 07 May 2008 Michael de Kretser Consultants Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 May 2008	Michael de Kretser Consultants Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants, and further order that damages be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.